|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"S Curtiss" wrote in message newsdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... "S Curtiss" wrote in message news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave. com... [...] ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. Hello Dolan, the great idiot Thus proving my point! To who...? I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk. Thus proving my point! You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and jerk. We've known that for quite some time. The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a man of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great. "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as interesting as myself. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as interesting as myself. pathetic |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message newsP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman. He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots, jerks and assholes. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
"JimmyMac" wrote in message oups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message newsdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... "S Curtiss" wrote in message news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave. com... [...] ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. Hello Dolan, the great idiot Thus proving my point! To who...? I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk. Thus proving my point! You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and jerk. We've known that for quite some time. The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a man of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great. "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as interesting as myself. Not even Sherman or Vandeman??? Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life. Sherman and Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of course. I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but I grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he was posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because he steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more about recumbents than I did and I respected him for that. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:15:14 -0500, "Edward Dolan"
wrote: snip Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life. Sherman and Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet them in person, that is all they can ever be. Tommy Keats are you reading this? snip |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
In article ,
R Brickston rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@ writes: Tommy Keats are you reading this? 1) please do not refer to me with the diminuative: "Tommy". That's reserved for people I particularly like, Bobby. And even then, not that often. 2) No. I'm making better use of my time by listening to rock tunes from the early-mid '70s, plus some 50's rockabilly, plus some late '70s-early-'80s New Wave. Da Da Da. I'm a honky-tonk man, and I can't seem to stop. I love to give the girls a whirl to the music of an old juke box. Motha****a shoulda stayed his ass home. Go to sleep bitch, close your eyes. When I was young, I had a crash, the old man's car took quite a bash ... Girl, this punishment is rough, don't you think I've paid enough. Something tells me my lucky number's going to be changing soon ... If you see my milk cow, please drive her home. You can't always get what you want. cheers, & **** the hell off grin, Tom -- -- Nothing is safe from me. Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 75 | July 8th 06 04:24 AM |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | Recumbent Biking | 78 | July 8th 06 04:24 AM |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | General | 0 | June 28th 06 07:26 AM |
Hey Dolan I hope Vandeman doesn't stop suddenly | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 0 | June 10th 06 07:57 AM |
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) | David | Recumbent Biking | 65 | December 21st 04 06:42 AM |