#31
|
|||
|
|||
The word is out: It's over.
On 8/25/11 3:13 PM, BL wrote:
On 8/25/2011 2:47 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: On 8/25/2011 1:30 PM, BL wrote: As complex federal investigations go, this one seems to be proceeding nicely. You won't have to wait much longer to read the indictment. You don't have a clue about how the "indictment" is proceeding. Not hard to imagine this mind you. How would you know ? or is this simply more of your endless flag waving on your Anti-Lance diatribe ? Give us details on your sources for this ..... Or better yet, shut the **** up. Like pretty much everyone else here I've grown tired of your rhetoric. Bill Try re-reading what I wrote. I didn't say the indictment was proceeding. I said the investigation seems to be going well. Candyass. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/25/11 3:09 PM, BL wrote:
On 8/25/2011 2:38 PM, Fred Flintstein wrote: Trolling Laff isn't that hard. Mr OCD responds to everything. He can't help himself. F ROTFL!! Like you don't? Yeah. You're never going to understand how ironic it is that you responded to that. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/26/2011 8:36 PM, Jimmy July wrote:
On 8/25/11 3:09 PM, BL wrote: On 8/25/2011 2:38 PM, Fred Flintstein wrote: Trolling Laff isn't that hard. Mr OCD responds to everything. He can't help himself. F ROTFL!! Like you don't? Yeah. You're never going to understand how ironic it is that you responded to that. You children are so moronically predictable. I don't even have to start the thread before you all have hard-ons. Once I make any substantive comment you kiddies pollute 80% the tread with personal invective. It's so amusing to see you guys have your own little, inane dialogue. :-) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/27/2011 9:02 AM, BL wrote:
On 8/26/2011 8:36 PM, Jimmy July wrote: On 8/25/11 3:09 PM, BL wrote: On 8/25/2011 2:38 PM, Fred Flintstein wrote: Trolling Laff isn't that hard. Mr OCD responds to everything. He can't help himself. F ROTFL!! Like you don't? Yeah. You're never going to understand how ironic it is that you responded to that. You children are so moronically predictable. I don't even have to start the thread before you all have hard-ons. Once I make any substantive comment you kiddies pollute 80% the tread with personal invective. It's so amusing to see you guys have your own little, inane dialogue. :-) Bob said "Mr OCD responds to everything", and you're knocking yourself out proving him correct. No one's making you do this, so quit blaming everyone else for your inability to STFU. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/27/2011 11:02 AM, BL wrote:
Once I make any substantive comment You have never actually done this. None of your comments have any substance to them. And that dear boy is the problem. Bill -- William R. Mattil http://www.celestial-images.com |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/27/2011 12:19 PM, Jimmy July wrote:
On 8/27/2011 9:02 AM, BL wrote: On 8/26/2011 8:36 PM, Jimmy July wrote: On 8/25/11 3:09 PM, BL wrote: On 8/25/2011 2:38 PM, Fred Flintstein wrote: Trolling Laff isn't that hard. Mr OCD responds to everything. He can't help himself. F ROTFL!! Like you don't? Yeah. You're never going to understand how ironic it is that you responded to that. You children are so moronically predictable. I don't even have to start the thread before you all have hard-ons. Once I make any substantive comment you kiddies pollute 80% the tread with personal invective. It's so amusing to see you guys have your own little, inane dialogue. :-) Bob said "Mr OCD responds to everything", and you're knocking yourself out proving him correct. No one's making you do this, so quit blaming everyone else for your inability to STFU. ROTFL!! And no one is making you children post your personal nonsense. I do have to admit that it's fun to troll you after the your first non-substantive response. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/27/2011 12:30 PM, William R. Mattil wrote:
On 8/27/2011 11:02 AM, BL wrote: Once I make any substantive comment You have never actually done this. None of your comments have any substance to them. And that dear boy is the problem. Bill Come now, you know that isn't true. Earlier in this thread I began with a substantive reply to Anders and followed it up with a link to a news article and a substantive comment regarding it. You children then started running amok in the playground as you usually do with your playground personal comments. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/27/2011 9:46 AM, BL wrote:
On 8/27/2011 12:30 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: On 8/27/2011 11:02 AM, BL wrote: Once I make any substantive comment You have never actually done this. None of your comments have any substance to them. And that dear boy is the problem. Bill Come now, you know that isn't true. Earlier in this thread I began with a substantive reply to Anders and followed it up with a link to a news article and a substantive comment regarding it. Your delusions don't count as substance. You've been mindlessly repeating yourself for a decade, pretending to know the inner workings and processes that will lead to LA's imminent demise. And you've been repeatedly wrong. That's not substance, it's just crazy. When I tell you've been repeatedly wrong and you're acting crazy, it's not a personal attack. It's just the simple truth. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On 8/27/2011 7:03 PM, Jimmy July wrote:
On 8/27/2011 9:46 AM, BL wrote: On 8/27/2011 12:30 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: On 8/27/2011 11:02 AM, BL wrote: Once I make any substantive comment You have never actually done this. None of your comments have any substance to them. And that dear boy is the problem. Bill Come now, you know that isn't true. Earlier in this thread I began with a substantive reply to Anders and followed it up with a link to a news article and a substantive comment regarding it. Your delusions don't count as substance. You've been mindlessly repeating yourself for a decade, pretending to know the inner workings and processes that will lead to LA's imminent demise. And you've been repeatedly wrong. That's not substance, it's just crazy. When I tell you've been repeatedly wrong and you're acting crazy, it's not a personal attack. It's just the simple truth. ROTFLMAO!!! Right, Jimmie Moron. Just love your incorrect assertions. I've been saying for years that Armstrong is a doper and guess what--He is! Amazing, eh. Deal with it and the fact that I've been correct all along. Enjoy your day Jimmie. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
LA/Feds
On Aug 28, 7:39*am, BL wrote:
On 8/27/2011 7:03 PM, Jimmy July wrote: On 8/27/2011 9:46 AM, BL wrote: On 8/27/2011 12:30 PM, William R. Mattil wrote: On 8/27/2011 11:02 AM, BL wrote: Once I make any substantive comment You have never actually done this. None of your comments have any substance to them. And that dear boy is the problem. Bill Come now, you know that isn't true. Earlier in this thread I began with a substantive reply to Anders and followed it up with a link to a news article and a substantive comment regarding it. Your delusions don't count as substance. You've been mindlessly repeating yourself for a decade, pretending to know the inner workings and processes that will lead to LA's imminent demise. And you've been repeatedly wrong. That's not substance, it's just crazy. When I tell you've been repeatedly wrong and you're acting crazy, it's not a personal attack. It's just the simple truth. ROTFLMAO!!! *Right, Jimmie Moron. *Just love your incorrect assertions. I've been saying for years that Armstrong is a doper and guess what--He is! Amazing, eh. Deal with it and the fact that I've been correct all along. Enjoy your day Jimmie. Brian, virtually everyone on this n.g. has known that LA was a doper for years. The only reason people rag on you is because of your obsession with his prosecution, and your belief that it would somehow change the sport for the better. Anyone who has finished in the top 10 on GC of a major tour the past two (three? more?) decades has likely doped either for the event or at some point in their career. Wasting millions of dollars of US taxpayer money going after a guy who doped in a sport full of dopers a decade ago seems ridiculous and pointless to most of us. If you weren't obsessed with LA, maybe you'd see it that way, too. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report: Hincapie tells feds he saw Armstrong use banned substances | yirgster | Racing | 1 | May 21st 11 02:05 AM |
McIlvain subpoenaed by feds | Magilla Gorilla[_2_] | Racing | 10 | September 16th 10 10:58 PM |
Floyd in "daily contact" with feds - Article | Francesco del Ponte | Racing | 9 | June 5th 10 06:15 PM |
John Howard is Guilty of his own Sedition Laws. FEDS AND MILITARY ARREST HOWARD NOW!!! | [email protected] | Australia | 1 | October 1st 06 10:25 PM |