|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote:
Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On 07/04/2019 21:58, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote: Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' You are projecting again. Anyone who drives a motor vehicle or rides a bicycle on a pedestrian-only part of the highway (especially a footway) should be prosecuted. It's only people like you who think it's acceptable to drive and/or ride where driving and riding are prohibited. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On 07/04/2019 23:15, JNugent wrote:
You are projecting again. ....says the champion of the art. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 11:15:53 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 07/04/2019 21:58, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote: Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' You are projecting again. Anyone who drives a motor vehicle or rides a bicycle on a pedestrian-only part of the highway (especially a footway) should be prosecuted. It's only people like you who think it's acceptable to drive and/or ride where driving and riding are prohibited. Please cite the post where I have said this is acceptable. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On 08/04/2019 12:09, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 11:15:53 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 07/04/2019 21:58, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote: Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' You are projecting again. Anyone who drives a motor vehicle or rides a bicycle on a pedestrian-only part of the highway (especially a footway) should be prosecuted. It's only people like you who think it's acceptable to drive and/or ride where driving and riding are prohibited. Please cite the post where I have said this is acceptable. If you have condemned pavement cyclists (unequivocally), I missed that post. Perhaps you could conveniently repeat the condemnation now, then I can give you the applause which would then be necessary. We'll soon see... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 1:56:50 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/04/2019 12:09, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 11:15:53 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 07/04/2019 21:58, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote: Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' You are projecting again. Anyone who drives a motor vehicle or rides a bicycle on a pedestrian-only part of the highway (especially a footway) should be prosecuted. It's only people like you who think it's acceptable to drive and/or ride where driving and riding are prohibited. Please cite the post where I have said this is acceptable. If you have condemned pavement cyclists (unequivocally), I missed that post. Perhaps you could conveniently repeat the condemnation now, then I can give you the applause which would then be necessary. We'll soon see... Just answer the question and leave the goalposts alone. Where did I say pavement cycling is acceptable? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On 09/04/2019 09:13, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 1:56:50 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 08/04/2019 12:09, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 11:15:53 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 07/04/2019 21:58, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote: Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' You are projecting again. Anyone who drives a motor vehicle or rides a bicycle on a pedestrian-only part of the highway (especially a footway) should be prosecuted. It's only people like you who think it's acceptable to drive and/or ride where driving and riding are prohibited. Please cite the post where I have said this is acceptable. If you have condemned pavement cyclists (unequivocally), I missed that post. Perhaps you could conveniently repeat the condemnation now, then I can give you the applause which would then be necessary. We'll soon see... Just answer the question and leave the goalposts alone. Where did I say pavement cycling is acceptable? See what I mean? You don't condemn pavement cycling and never have. If you had, and if you were posting in good faith, you'd have no difficulty in repeating it. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 2:05:48 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/04/2019 09:13, Simon Jester wrote: On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 1:56:50 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 08/04/2019 12:09, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 11:15:53 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 07/04/2019 21:58, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote: Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' You are projecting again. Anyone who drives a motor vehicle or rides a bicycle on a pedestrian-only part of the highway (especially a footway) should be prosecuted. It's only people like you who think it's acceptable to drive and/or ride where driving and riding are prohibited. Please cite the post where I have said this is acceptable. If you have condemned pavement cyclists (unequivocally), I missed that post. Perhaps you could conveniently repeat the condemnation now, then I can give you the applause which would then be necessary. We'll soon see... Just answer the question and leave the goalposts alone. Where did I say pavement cycling is acceptable? See what I mean? You don't condemn pavement cycling and never have. If you had, and if you were posting in good faith, you'd have no difficulty in repeating it. Not condemning something and saying it is acceptable are completely different. I have never universally condemned drink driving on this group, does that mean I find it acceptable? Now, are you going to provide evidence or not? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a cycle or footpath?
On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 9:58:03 PM UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 2:03:17 PM UTC+1, wrote: Nobody seems to know what it is. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...otpath-2386098 It's not a road and that is the only thing that matters. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/34 No doubt Nugent will cry 'But Mummy cyclists ride on pavements and it's not faaayeeeerrr' Guess what? I dropped my car off for its MOT today and walking back home, we passed a parked car half on the footpath in the village of Worlaby. IT HAD A FPN STUCK TO ITS WINDSCREEN! (((APPLAUSE))) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Don't cycle on the footpath | Alycidon | UK | 2 | October 14th 15 09:38 AM |
Look where you are going and don't ride on a footpath | Mrcheerful | UK | 0 | March 1st 14 01:46 PM |
On the footpath? | Mr Pounder | UK | 3 | December 14th 11 05:10 PM |
footpath riding | Zebee Johnstone | Australia | 27 | October 13th 07 04:36 AM |
Prize for narrowest combined cycle lane/footpath. | David W.E. Roberts | UK | 5 | August 31st 04 11:32 AM |