So, is cycling dangerous or not then?

Sorry I lost the plot.

Nick wrote:
:: Sorry I lost the plot.

If you're stupid it can be very dangerous.

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:06:35 +0100, Nick wrote:
Sorry I lost the plot.

Well, it's not about whether cycling is dangerous or not dangerous.
It's not about helmets. It's about using gigabytes of bandwidth (by
the time it goes to everybody's news server) that could otherwise be
used for spam. Get it?
--
Rick "Note: Silly statements may be above" Onanian

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:06:35 +0100, Nick wrote:

Sorry I lost the plot.

I think the conclusion was that cycling is absolutely the safest thing
you could possibly do. Not even spending all your time in a heavily
guarded compound with a fully equipped indoor gym and a lifetime
supply of health food is comparable.

Actually, I lost the plot, too.

wrote:

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:06:35 +0100, Nick wrote:

Sorry I lost the plot.

I think the conclusion was that cycling is absolutely the safest thing
you could possibly do. Not even spending all your time in a heavily
guarded compound with a fully equipped indoor gym and a lifetime
supply of health food is comparable.

Ugh. Your right, that does sound less healthy.

--
Benjamin Lewis

A woman, especially if she have the misfortune of knowing anything,
should conceal it as well as she can.
-- Jane Austen

"Rick Onanian" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:06:35 +0100, Nick wrote:
Sorry I lost the plot.

Well, it's not about whether cycling is dangerous or not dangerous.
It's not about helmets. It's about using gigabytes of bandwidth (by
the time it goes to everybody's news server) that could otherwise be
used for spam. Get it?
--
Rick "Note: Silly statements may be above" Onanian

I wonder what the original poster ended up telling his friend?

Bob C.