Haymarket crash: Several injured as double-decker bus smashes intocars in busy West End street

On 26/12/2017 16:09, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:06:02 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:57, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:49:07 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:29, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

And anyway, are you seriously telling me you'd rather have someone die
than risk a red light ticket?

Where did I ever say that or even anything like that?

Several times in the part you conveniently snipped.

Ah well just goes to show how wrong you are, and despite you repeatedly
calling me a **** I shall do the Christian thing, even though I haven't
got a christian thought in my head, and wish you well.

"May you live in interesting times".

Why did you snip then ask me where you said it?* You were deliberately
trying to hide something.

Unlike you I remember what a thread was about so I can snip it to
reasonable sizes

I did not snip it to hide me saying you shouldn't get out of the way of
an Ambulance I couldn't have as I never said that however a complete
mess of qoutes, attributions etc I see no future in.

I invite you to go over everything I ever said in this thread or out
of it and tell me where I said I didn't think people should get out of
the way of Ambulances, I won't hold my breath as you can't do it.

Why did you constantly disagree when I said people should get out of the
way of ambulances?* I hope they fit bullbars and flatten you.

I did not disagree, you asked why they didn't do it I was saying why, I
wasn't agreeing with them.

Anyway I tire of this so you may have the last word.

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:35:38 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
soup wrote:
On 26/12/2017 15:06, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:27:00 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 10:26, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:48:05 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 21/12/2017 16:48, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

Isn't it an offence not to get out of the way of an ambulance?

Nope.

Rule 219 (of the Highwaycode)advises motorists to "look and
listen" for emergency vehicles and "take appropriate action to
let it pass. while complying with all traffic signs".

So yes then.

Still no.

Note the use of the word "advises".

The commonly held thought about a 'law' in the HC [1] is that if
it says must it is a law from somewhere if it only says should it
is good practise

[1] The Highway Code is NOT in itself law, it is a collection of
laws and good practises from all over.

Well it should be a law. And I'm pretty sure if you just completely
ignored an ambulance, and a policeman caught you, you'd be in
severe ****. He'd find something to charge an arsehole like you
with. GET OUT OF THE WAY OF AN AMBULANCE, or you're an accomplice
to manslaughter.

Yes he would 'throw the book' at you, including all the stupid laws,
but one thing he couldn't 'do you for' was impeding the ambulance.

You are aware that you are feeding the well known troll, ****** and
psychopath PHucker?

Thanks for letting me know you're on the side of ******s who hold up
ambulances. I figured as much. I hope it's your wife in the back of
the next one that gets obstructed, then you'll change your mind.

I never said that I was on the side of drivers holding up emergency
vehicles. This is just another figment of your psychotic mind.
As for you hoping that my wife is in the back of an ambulance, you have once
more confirmed that you are 100% an arsehole.
Now, go have a wank you lonely little **** all.

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:11:36 -0000, soup
wrote:
On 26/12/2017 16:09, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:06:02 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:57, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:49:07 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:29, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

And anyway, are you seriously telling me you'd rather have
someone die than risk a red light ticket?

Where did I ever say that or even anything like that?

Several times in the part you conveniently snipped.

Ah well just goes to show how wrong you are, and despite you
repeatedly calling me a **** I shall do the Christian thing, even
though I haven't got a christian thought in my head, and wish you
well. "May you live in interesting times".

Why did you snip then ask me where you said it? You were
deliberately trying to hide something.

Unlike you I remember what a thread was about so I can snip it to
reasonable sizes

What's unreasonable about 5 levels of context? And you must lead a
sad life if you can remember every post you've read.
I did not snip it to hide me saying

Funny how it got suddenly and drastically snipped just at that point.

you shouldn't get out of the way of
an Ambulance I couldn't have as I never said that however a complete
mess of qoutes, attributions etc I see no future in.

It's not a mess, the level of indents is quite clear.

I invite you to go over everything I ever said in this thread or
out of it and tell me where I said I didn't think people should get
out of the way of Ambulances, I won't hold my breath as you can't do
it.

I can't be bothered going to find the earlier posts. I'm not reading
this in the group, but in a folder of replies to my posts. I don't
have time to read the whole group, I only look for a new posts when I
run out of replies.
Why did you constantly disagree when I said people should get out
of the way of ambulances? I hope they fit bullbars and flatten you.

I did not disagree, you asked why they didn't do it I was saying
why, I wasn't agreeing with them.

You agreed by default as you didn't say they were wrong to do so.

Anyway I tire of this so you may have the last word.

Assuming that means you've killfiled me, it's YOU that just had the
last word, which is very childish, waiting till I've replied, then
telling me not to bother.

Yet another one to killfile you 'eh, PHucker?
Why can't you see the writing on the wall?
Prick.

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:44:32 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:11:36 -0000, soup
wrote:
On 26/12/2017 16:09, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:06:02 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:57, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:49:07 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:29, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

And anyway, are you seriously telling me you'd rather have
someone die than risk a red light ticket?

Where did I ever say that or even anything like that?

Several times in the part you conveniently snipped.

Ah well just goes to show how wrong you are, and despite you
repeatedly calling me a **** I shall do the Christian thing, even
though I haven't got a christian thought in my head, and wish you
well. "May you live in interesting times".

Why did you snip then ask me where you said it? You were
deliberately trying to hide something.

Unlike you I remember what a thread was about so I can snip it
to reasonable sizes

What's unreasonable about 5 levels of context? And you must lead a
sad life if you can remember every post you've read.
I did not snip it to hide me saying

Funny how it got suddenly and drastically snipped just at that
point.
you shouldn't get out of the way of
an Ambulance I couldn't have as I never said that however a
complete mess of qoutes, attributions etc I see no future in.

It's not a mess, the level of indents is quite clear.

I invite you to go over everything I ever said in this thread or
out of it and tell me where I said I didn't think people should
get out of the way of Ambulances, I won't hold my breath as you
can't do it.

I can't be bothered going to find the earlier posts. I'm not
reading this in the group, but in a folder of replies to my posts. I
don't have time to read the whole group, I only look for a new
posts when I run out of replies.
Why did you constantly disagree when I said people should get out
of the way of ambulances? I hope they fit bullbars and flatten
you.

I did not disagree, you asked why they didn't do it I was saying
why, I wasn't agreeing with them.

You agreed by default as you didn't say they were wrong to do so.

Anyway I tire of this so you may have the last word.

Assuming that means you've killfiled me, it's YOU that just had the
last word, which is very childish, waiting till I've replied, then
telling me not to bother.

Yet another one to killfile you 'eh, PHucker?
Why can't you see the writing on the wall?
Prick.

You're in just as many.

Nope. That is just another lie from your deceased mind.

And it's the people killfiling me that are
pricks. They can't handle reality.

Nope. They are intelligent people who do not see the point with arguing with
a well known troll who is incapable of discussion.

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:41:22 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:35:38 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
soup wrote:
On 26/12/2017 15:06, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:27:00 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 10:26, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:48:05 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 21/12/2017 16:48, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

Isn't it an offence not to get out of the way of an
ambulance?

Nope.

Rule 219 (of the Highwaycode)advises motorists to "look and
listen" for emergency vehicles and "take appropriate action to
let it pass. while complying with all traffic signs".

So yes then.

Still no.

Note the use of the word "advises".

The commonly held thought about a 'law' in the HC [1] is that if
it says must it is a law from somewhere if it only says should
it is good practise

[1] The Highway Code is NOT in itself law, it is a collection of
laws and good practises from all over.

Well it should be a law. And I'm pretty sure if you just
completely ignored an ambulance, and a policeman caught you,
you'd be in severe ****. He'd find something to charge an
arsehole like you with. GET OUT OF THE WAY OF AN AMBULANCE, or
you're an accomplice to manslaughter.

Yes he would 'throw the book' at you, including all the stupid
laws, but one thing he couldn't 'do you for' was impeding the
ambulance.

You are aware that you are feeding the well known troll, ****** and
psychopath PHucker?

Thanks for letting me know you're on the side of ******s who hold up
ambulances. I figured as much. I hope it's your wife in the back
of the next one that gets obstructed, then you'll change your mind.

I never said that I was on the side of drivers holding up emergency
vehicles. This is just another figment of your psychotic mind.

You most certainly did, you were disagreeing with me. I was saying
everyone should get out of the way no matter what, and you disagreed.

I did not agree or disagree with you. You could always show me where I said
anything regarding getting out of the way of emergency vehicles. Or, is
there a problem?

As for you hoping that my wife is in the back of an ambulance, you
have once more confirmed that you are 100% an arsehole.
Now, go have a wank you lonely little **** all.

It's the only way it would teach you a lesson.

What would teach me a lesson?

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:13:48 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:41:22 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:35:38 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
soup wrote:
On 26/12/2017 15:06, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:27:00 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 10:26, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:48:05 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 21/12/2017 16:48, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

Isn't it an offence not to get out of the way of an
ambulance?

Nope.

Rule 219 (of the Highwaycode)advises motorists to "look and
listen" for emergency vehicles and "take appropriate action
to let it pass. while complying with all traffic signs".

So yes then.

Still no.

Note the use of the word "advises".

The commonly held thought about a 'law' in the HC [1] is that
if it says must it is a law from somewhere if it only says
should it is good practise

[1] The Highway Code is NOT in itself law, it is a collection
of laws and good practises from all over.

Well it should be a law. And I'm pretty sure if you just
completely ignored an ambulance, and a policeman caught you,
you'd be in severe ****. He'd find something to charge an
arsehole like you with. GET OUT OF THE WAY OF AN AMBULANCE, or
you're an accomplice to manslaughter.

Yes he would 'throw the book' at you, including all the stupid
laws, but one thing he couldn't 'do you for' was impeding the
ambulance.

You are aware that you are feeding the well known troll, ******
and psychopath PHucker?

Thanks for letting me know you're on the side of ******s who hold
up ambulances. I figured as much. I hope it's your wife in the
back of the next one that gets obstructed, then you'll change
your mind.

I never said that I was on the side of drivers holding up emergency
vehicles. This is just another figment of your psychotic mind.

You most certainly did, you were disagreeing with me. I was saying
everyone should get out of the way no matter what, and you
disagreed.

I did not agree or disagree with you. You could always show me where
I said anything regarding getting out of the way of emergency
vehicles. Or, is there a problem?

If someone posts a link to a newspaper and makes no comment, they
agree with it.

Utter rubbish.
Many of my comments are deleted. I'm on my 17th account with some
newspapers.
I lose accounts by offering comments on dole artists and cyclists. You are
both.

As for you hoping that my wife is in the back of an ambulance, you
have once more confirmed that you are 100% an arsehole.
Now, go have a wank you lonely little **** all.

It's the only way it would teach you a lesson.

What would teach me a lesson?

That ambulances must not be obstructed, or people die.

See my above posting.
Bell-end.

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 19:19:21 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:13:48 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:41:22 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:35:38 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
soup wrote:
On 26/12/2017 15:06, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:27:00 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 10:26, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:48:05 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 21/12/2017 16:48, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

Isn't it an offence not to get out of the way of an
ambulance?

Nope.

Rule 219 (of the Highwaycode)advises motorists to "look
and listen" for emergency vehicles and "take appropriate
action to let it pass. while complying with all traffic
signs".

So yes then.

Still no.

Note the use of the word "advises".

The commonly held thought about a 'law' in the HC [1] is
that if it says must it is a law from somewhere if it only
says should it is good practise

[1] The Highway Code is NOT in itself law, it is a
collection of laws and good practises from all over.

Well it should be a law. And I'm pretty sure if you just
completely ignored an ambulance, and a policeman caught you,
you'd be in severe ****. He'd find something to charge an
arsehole like you with. GET OUT OF THE WAY OF AN AMBULANCE,
or you're an accomplice to manslaughter.

Yes he would 'throw the book' at you, including all the stupid
laws, but one thing he couldn't 'do you for' was impeding the
ambulance.

You are aware that you are feeding the well known troll, ******
and psychopath PHucker?

Thanks for letting me know you're on the side of ******s who
hold up ambulances. I figured as much. I hope it's your wife
in the back of the next one that gets obstructed, then you'll
change your mind.

I never said that I was on the side of drivers holding up
emergency vehicles. This is just another figment of your
psychotic mind.

You most certainly did, you were disagreeing with me. I was
saying everyone should get out of the way no matter what, and you
disagreed.

I did not agree or disagree with you. You could always show me
where I said anything regarding getting out of the way of emergency
vehicles. Or, is there a problem?

If someone posts a link to a newspaper and makes no comment, they
agree with it.

Utter rubbish.
Many of my comments are deleted. I'm on my 17th account with some
newspapers.

I meant in here. If I post a link to an article about a cyclist
getting locked up for killing someone, and I write nothing under the
link, then I'm agreeing he should have been jailed. If I disagreed I
would say so.

One example of one of my postings is below. WTF are you on about?

"Most likely drugs and cyclists yet again.
I live about 30 miles away. If this lump of footpath riding **** had have
come towards me I'd have kicked the thing into the gutter - where all scum
cyclists belong."

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/...speak-14073979




I lose accounts by offering comments on dole artists and cyclists.
You are both.

I only claimed the dole for short period (under 2 years) when I had
no work or was too ill to work.

Two years on the dole, now tax credits and most likely everything you can
drain from the system.
When are you going to grow a pair?

I very rarely cycle, and even then usually offroad.

Having a bicycle is a sign of being a low life pikey.

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 20:22:30 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 19:19:21 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:13:48 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:41:22 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:35:38 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
soup wrote:
On 26/12/2017 15:06, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:27:00 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 10:26, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:48:05 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 21/12/2017 16:48, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

Isn't it an offence not to get out of the way of an
ambulance?

Nope.

Rule 219 (of the Highwaycode)advises motorists to "look
and listen" for emergency vehicles and "take appropriate
action to let it pass. while complying with all traffic
signs".

So yes then.

Still no.

Note the use of the word "advises".

The commonly held thought about a 'law' in the HC [1] is
that if it says must it is a law from somewhere if it only
says should it is good practise

[1] The Highway Code is NOT in itself law, it is a
collection of laws and good practises from all over.

Well it should be a law. And I'm pretty sure if you just
completely ignored an ambulance, and a policeman caught
you, you'd be in severe ****. He'd find something to
charge an arsehole like you with. GET OUT OF THE WAY OF AN
AMBULANCE, or you're an accomplice to manslaughter.

Yes he would 'throw the book' at you, including all the
stupid laws, but one thing he couldn't 'do you for' was
impeding the ambulance.

You are aware that you are feeding the well known troll,
****** and psychopath PHucker?

Thanks for letting me know you're on the side of ******s who
hold up ambulances. I figured as much. I hope it's your wife
in the back of the next one that gets obstructed, then you'll
change your mind.

I never said that I was on the side of drivers holding up
emergency vehicles. This is just another figment of your
psychotic mind.

You most certainly did, you were disagreeing with me. I was
saying everyone should get out of the way no matter what, and
you disagreed.

I did not agree or disagree with you. You could always show me
where I said anything regarding getting out of the way of
emergency vehicles. Or, is there a problem?

If someone posts a link to a newspaper and makes no comment, they
agree with it.

Utter rubbish.
Many of my comments are deleted. I'm on my 17th account with some
newspapers.

I meant in here. If I post a link to an article about a cyclist
getting locked up for killing someone, and I write nothing under the
link, then I'm agreeing he should have been jailed. If I disagreed
I would say so.

One example of one of my postings is below. WTF are you on about?

"Most likely drugs and cyclists yet again.
I live about 30 miles away. If this lump of footpath riding **** had
have come towards me I'd have kicked the thing into the gutter -
where all scum cyclists belong."

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/...speak-14073979

I was not referring to one of yours. You always correctly make a
comment. But some people will just put in the link and the subject.
In that case we have to assume they agree with the article.
I lose accounts by offering comments on dole artists and cyclists.
You are both.

I only claimed the dole for short period (under 2 years) when I had
no work or was too ill to work.

Two years on the dole, now tax credits and most likely everything
you can drain from the system.
When are you going to grow a pair?

I earn what I am capable of.

Man with a degree my backside.
Tough Guy my backside.

I very rarely cycle, and even then usually offroad.

Having a bicycle is a sign of being a low life pikey.

A bicycle can go where a car cannot.

Oh, do **** off.

On 26.12.2017 20:13, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
The only one from memory who has killfiled me is samplusnet or something. He
is probably dead now as it was that long ago.
Even Simon Mason did not k/f me.
Even GB has not k/f me.
So, you are lying, as always.

I have not k/f you but you seem to have k/f me.

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:44:32 GMT, "Mr Pounder Esquire"
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:11:36 -0000, soup
wrote:
On 26/12/2017 16:09, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:06:02 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:57, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:49:07 -0000, soup
wrote:

On 26/12/2017 15:29, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


Yet another one to killfile you 'eh, PHucker?
Why can't you see the writing on the wall?
Prick.


I just read you slating some one for "feeding the troll".
And yet here you are.

--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.