|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:26:34 +0000, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
And, of course, over 26 years you're going to get a few people bringing bikes into the store, claiming their fork is defective because the dropout is bent outward at a 45 degree angle, and it just happened riding along. Somehow. It doesn't take too long to explain to them what happened; of course, you have to do so in a non-incriminating fashion, somehow convincing them that you believe it's possible they might not have noticed it happening. The thing we have to do sometimes to maintain a customer's dignity... :) At first glance, I would think these cases are few enough that companies like Trek could afford to replace forks for these people, at least within the initial warranty period, whether they "should hafta" or not. Matt O. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
"Matt O'Toole" wrote in message news On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:26:34 +0000, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: And, of course, over 26 years you're going to get a few people bringing bikes into the store, claiming their fork is defective because the dropout is bent outward at a 45 degree angle, and it just happened riding along. Somehow. It doesn't take too long to explain to them what happened; of course, you have to do so in a non-incriminating fashion, somehow convincing them that you believe it's possible they might not have noticed it happening. The thing we have to do sometimes to maintain a customer's dignity... :) At first glance, I would think these cases are few enough that companies like Trek could afford to replace forks for these people, at least within the initial warranty period, whether they "should hafta" or not. Being nice is nice, but it shifts the financial burden to the poor dealer who is working on narrow margins and has to do the installation work for free, depending on the terms of the dealership agreement. We have already had the exhausting thread about free work. Personally, I do not expect anything more or less than what the warranty gives me. I have been on the other side of a rep's discretionary determination that I don't get a replacement, but someone else does -- eventhough we both had similar non-warranteed failures. Totally ****ed me off, and I had been a very loyal customer for 20 years. I would rather the warranty be administered the same for everyone. -- Jay Beattie. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
And, of course, over 26 years you're going to get a few people bringing
bikes into the store, claiming their fork is defective because the dropout is bent outward at a 45 degree angle, and it just happened riding along. Somehow. It doesn't take too long to explain to them what happened; of course, you have to do so in a non-incriminating fashion, somehow convincing them that you believe it's possible they might not have noticed it happening. The thing we have to do sometimes to maintain a customer's dignity... :) At first glance, I would think these cases are few enough that companies like Trek could afford to replace forks for these people, at least within the initial warranty period, whether they "should hafta" or not. Matt O. Matt: You may have misunderstood the nature of the incident described. The fork dropouts get bent when the customer has the bike balanced precariously, manages to secure just one side of the fork in the clamp without realizing it, the bike then tips towards them and *poof* you've got a possibly-destroyed dropout. If this was a situation where the damage could even remotely be caused by a product being defective, there might be times when you'd give someone the benefit of the doubt, even though it's highly unlikely to have been the product's fault. But it's not. And experience over the years has taught me one sad thing- it is, indeed, possible to be too nice, too accomodating for a customer. We had a few times way, way, WAY back in the day, when we thought it best to eat certain things in the name of building customer loyalty. And you know what happened? People then believed that ANYTHING that happened to their bike was the bike's fault, because, after all, we took care of that bent rim for them. There's nothing wrong with acting reasonably, and expecting others to do so as well. We have exceptionally-few issues, because we go to the trouble of not just telling somebody "That's what happens when you do something stupid" but rather why it's not designed to handle that, why that's not in the category of normal use, and perhaps a lesson in physics about how much impact there actually was. In nearly all cases, the customers are impressed that someone actually takes the time to figure out what really happened and explain it to them. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA "Matt O'Toole" wrote in message news On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:26:34 +0000, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: And, of course, over 26 years you're going to get a few people bringing bikes into the store, claiming their fork is defective because the dropout is bent outward at a 45 degree angle, and it just happened riding along. Somehow. It doesn't take too long to explain to them what happened; of course, you have to do so in a non-incriminating fashion, somehow convincing them that you believe it's possible they might not have noticed it happening. The thing we have to do sometimes to maintain a customer's dignity... :) At first glance, I would think these cases are few enough that companies like Trek could afford to replace forks for these people, at least within the initial warranty period, whether they "should hafta" or not. Matt O. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
On 5 Jan 2006 09:37:54 -0800, wrote:
It would be nice if someone who owns the Easton or Litespeed fork could comment. Yeah, so then we can hear the RBT crew can tell them they're idiots who fall for marketing-speak... JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
Have been riding a Look HSC5 since April 2005 about 4000 miles, it's been
perfect and I am still here in one piece to say this. wrote in message ups.com... Eric Shanabrook wrote: Are there any fork carbon-dropout durability issues, it seems like metal might be a better material...for the dropouts? Could Carbon fiber crumble/crush under compression over time (compression from the skewer), but the fork makers probably have it figured out ok. Easton SLX 90 fork has carbon dropouts and it has been around for about 2 years. Litespeed Real Design HP Pro fork has carbon dropouts, with a covering of aluminum on both sides. Its been around for a few years. Look HSC5 fork has been out for a year now. It would be nice if someone who owns the Easton or Litespeed fork could comment. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
"Eric Shanabrook" wrote in
news:BQ0vf.8084$gq4.6918@trndny04: Are there any fork carbon-dropout durability issues, it seems like metal might be a better material...for the dropouts? Could Carbon fiber crumble/crush under compression over time (compression from the skewer), but the fork makers probably have it figured out ok. The question is WHY? What advantages would carbon dropouts have over metal? The weight saved is too negligible to make weight-saving a credible argument. This is nothing like comparing a carbon fork to a metal fork. If they ever do come up with this one... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
Thank you all for your input, I think metal dropouts make more sense to me,
with my understanding of materials..... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
In article , Mike
Jacoubowsky wrote: And, of course, over 26 years you're going to get a few people bringing bikes into the store, claiming their fork is defective because the dropout is bent outward at a 45 degree angle, and it just happened riding along. Somehow. It doesn't take too long to explain to them what happened; of course, you have to do so in a non-incriminating fashion, somehow convincing them that you believe it's possible they might not have noticed it happening. The thing we have to do sometimes to maintain a customer's dignity... :) I envy your acumen; you're the discriminating businessman who knows a little tact goes a long way. The customer comes in after trashing his fork and leaves satisfied, with esteem fortified and funds depleted! I wonder that diplomacy or (at the risk of insulting) politics is not your true calling. Luke |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
Okay, now I am worried. How tightly do I crank up my QR? I don't want
the axle to move with the torque but I also don't want to crush my drop out. Ted. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
carbon fork dropouts
The forks don't see much torque on a road bike with rim brakes under normal
conditions. I guess if you can put lateral loads on the front wheel then may need to be tighter. You don't need to tighten them as much as the rear wheel, especially horizontal dropouts. I would go tight enough so that if you bang on the top of the wheels with your fist the wheel doesn't budge. cel "Ted" wrote in message ups.com... Okay, now I am worried. How tightly do I crank up my QR? I don't want the axle to move with the torque but I also don't want to crush my drop out. Ted. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carbon Fibre Shortage & Bike Prices | TBF::. | Mountain Biking | 13 | May 20th 05 12:24 AM |
FS: Fork - Carbon Fiber cyclocross / hybrid w/ canti mounts | Mike Beauchamp | Marketplace | 1 | April 22nd 05 11:32 PM |
FS: Never ridden 55cm Serotta Colorado III frame and matching carbon fiber fork: $695 | Frank | Marketplace | 0 | April 17th 05 07:17 AM |
Why put a carbon fork on a road bike? | TedK618265 | Techniques | 92 | January 22nd 04 02:32 PM |
What's a good quality carbon fork? | NS> | Techniques | 17 | August 19th 03 10:56 PM |