|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anybody Riding Swedesford Road (around Philly, Pa) every morning?
If, by some chance, they're reading this NG....
I've seen you riding Swedesford Road several times already - yellow bike, yellow/black jersey, no helmet, black hair - always going eastbound around 8-9 am ....and had already witnessed a couple of hairy situations as rapidly-closing traffic encountered you. There's zero shoulder on sections this road and some of the commuter traffic is going 50+ while they talk on cell phones going around curves and over blind rises. A few them are taking notes while they talk on their cell phones. (some weeks ago, my dentist told me he almost got creamed by a guy that appeared TB doing email on aBlackberry.) On Thursday, you were riding eastbound and I was driving westbound. As I came around a bend and crested a blind rise, suddenly I was looking at a beemer SUV passing you - not just straddling the double center line...more like 2/3 or 3/4 over it. Since there was no shoulder and fairly substantial trees along the roadside, there was no place to hide. I just stood on the brakes while my eyeballs stuck out like golf balls. When the two vehicles passed, mine was stationary and the other was doing whatever he was doing when he passed you. As he swerved back into his lane, the distance between us appeared TB less than 3 feet. About three weeks ago, on the same road, I witnessed another near-head-on when some club or another was riding westbound. I know you're technically in the right and the beemer driver was 100% wrong - but this stuff happens with some predictability when people ride a road like that. Being right doesn't trump being dead or maimed. I work in the are and would think twice about even *walking* that road - although, to be truthful, I've picked my way along it once on my MTB...and been scared enough to never do it again. Find another road to ride. Think of it this way: you might get hit by a flying hubcap or something in the ensuing head-on collision that kills 2-3 drivers...or, maybe if I hadn't stood on my brakes, that beemer driver might have done the rationally-self-serving thing and creamed you to avoid a head-on. -- PeteCresswell |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:47:03 GMT, "(Pete Cresswell)" wrote:
This post is OT for rec.bicycles.tech Find another road to ride. Could you perhaps also talk to the town or local police to get some enforcement against dangerous passes like the BMW you mentioned. Thanks, JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The proper way for a motor vehicle to pass a slow moving vehicle is to wait
behind until safe to pass. Bicyclists have every right to the roadway. In CA only when you are blocking the flow of traffic (defined as five or more vehicles) do you need to pull over at the first safe opportunity to do so. Those irresponsible drivers are making it just as dangerous for other forms of traffic. With your logic, maybe everyone should avoid that road because of the danger those drivers create. "(Pete Cresswell)" wrote in message ... If, by some chance, they're reading this NG.... I've seen you riding Swedesford Road several times already - yellow bike, yellow/black jersey, no helmet, black hair - always going eastbound around 8-9 am ....and had already witnessed a couple of hairy situations as rapidly-closing traffic encountered you. There's zero shoulder on sections this road and some of the commuter traffic is going 50+ while they talk on cell phones going around curves and over blind rises. A few them are taking notes while they talk on their cell phones. (some weeks ago, my dentist told me he almost got creamed by a guy that appeared TB doing email on aBlackberry.) On Thursday, you were riding eastbound and I was driving westbound. As I came around a bend and crested a blind rise, suddenly I was looking at a beemer SUV passing you - not just straddling the double center line...more like 2/3 or 3/4 over it. Since there was no shoulder and fairly substantial trees along the roadside, there was no place to hide. I just stood on the brakes while my eyeballs stuck out like golf balls. When the two vehicles passed, mine was stationary and the other was doing whatever he was doing when he passed you. As he swerved back into his lane, the distance between us appeared TB less than 3 feet. About three weeks ago, on the same road, I witnessed another near-head-on when some club or another was riding westbound. I know you're technically in the right and the beemer driver was 100% wrong - but this stuff happens with some predictability when people ride a road like that. Being right doesn't trump being dead or maimed. I work in the are and would think twice about even *walking* that road - although, to be truthful, I've picked my way along it once on my MTB...and been scared enough to never do it again. Find another road to ride. Think of it this way: you might get hit by a flying hubcap or something in the ensuing head-on collision that kills 2-3 drivers...or, maybe if I hadn't stood on my brakes, that beemer driver might have done the rationally-self-serving thing and creamed you to avoid a head-on. -- PeteCresswell |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The proper way for a motor vehicle to pass a slow moving vehicle is to wait
behind until safe to pass. Bicyclists have every right to the roadway. In CA only when you are blocking the flow of traffic (defined as five or more vehicles) do you need to pull over at the first safe opportunity to do so. Those irresponsible drivers are making it just as dangerous for other forms of traffic. With your logic, maybe everyone should avoid that road because of the danger those drivers create. "(Pete Cresswell)" wrote in message ... If, by some chance, they're reading this NG.... I've seen you riding Swedesford Road several times already - yellow bike, yellow/black jersey, no helmet, black hair - always going eastbound around 8-9 am ....and had already witnessed a couple of hairy situations as rapidly-closing traffic encountered you. There's zero shoulder on sections this road and some of the commuter traffic is going 50+ while they talk on cell phones going around curves and over blind rises. A few them are taking notes while they talk on their cell phones. (some weeks ago, my dentist told me he almost got creamed by a guy that appeared TB doing email on aBlackberry.) On Thursday, you were riding eastbound and I was driving westbound. As I came around a bend and crested a blind rise, suddenly I was looking at a beemer SUV passing you - not just straddling the double center line...more like 2/3 or 3/4 over it. Since there was no shoulder and fairly substantial trees along the roadside, there was no place to hide. I just stood on the brakes while my eyeballs stuck out like golf balls. When the two vehicles passed, mine was stationary and the other was doing whatever he was doing when he passed you. As he swerved back into his lane, the distance between us appeared TB less than 3 feet. About three weeks ago, on the same road, I witnessed another near-head-on when some club or another was riding westbound. I know you're technically in the right and the beemer driver was 100% wrong - but this stuff happens with some predictability when people ride a road like that. Being right doesn't trump being dead or maimed. I work in the are and would think twice about even *walking* that road - although, to be truthful, I've picked my way along it once on my MTB...and been scared enough to never do it again. Find another road to ride. Think of it this way: you might get hit by a flying hubcap or something in the ensuing head-on collision that kills 2-3 drivers...or, maybe if I hadn't stood on my brakes, that beemer driver might have done the rationally-self-serving thing and creamed you to avoid a head-on. -- PeteCresswell |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The proper way for a motor vehicle to pass a slow moving vehicle is to wait
behind until safe to pass. Bicyclists have every right to the roadway. In CA only when you are blocking the flow of traffic (defined as five or more vehicles) do you need to pull over at the first safe opportunity to do so. Those irresponsible drivers are making it just as dangerous for other forms of traffic. With your logic, maybe everyone should avoid that road because of the danger those drivers create. "(Pete Cresswell)" wrote in message ... If, by some chance, they're reading this NG.... I've seen you riding Swedesford Road several times already - yellow bike, yellow/black jersey, no helmet, black hair - always going eastbound around 8-9 am ....and had already witnessed a couple of hairy situations as rapidly-closing traffic encountered you. There's zero shoulder on sections this road and some of the commuter traffic is going 50+ while they talk on cell phones going around curves and over blind rises. A few them are taking notes while they talk on their cell phones. (some weeks ago, my dentist told me he almost got creamed by a guy that appeared TB doing email on aBlackberry.) On Thursday, you were riding eastbound and I was driving westbound. As I came around a bend and crested a blind rise, suddenly I was looking at a beemer SUV passing you - not just straddling the double center line...more like 2/3 or 3/4 over it. Since there was no shoulder and fairly substantial trees along the roadside, there was no place to hide. I just stood on the brakes while my eyeballs stuck out like golf balls. When the two vehicles passed, mine was stationary and the other was doing whatever he was doing when he passed you. As he swerved back into his lane, the distance between us appeared TB less than 3 feet. About three weeks ago, on the same road, I witnessed another near-head-on when some club or another was riding westbound. I know you're technically in the right and the beemer driver was 100% wrong - but this stuff happens with some predictability when people ride a road like that. Being right doesn't trump being dead or maimed. I work in the are and would think twice about even *walking* that road - although, to be truthful, I've picked my way along it once on my MTB...and been scared enough to never do it again. Find another road to ride. Think of it this way: you might get hit by a flying hubcap or something in the ensuing head-on collision that kills 2-3 drivers...or, maybe if I hadn't stood on my brakes, that beemer driver might have done the rationally-self-serving thing and creamed you to avoid a head-on. -- PeteCresswell |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
RE/
The proper way... Reminds me of a guy I worked with at a summer camp that was gung-ho on "right-of-way" on the water. One day we had to motor out and pick him up - clinging to the wreckage of the sailboat he was in when some monster cruiser ran him and the boat over. He kept saying "But I had the right-of-way...". -- PeteCresswell |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 01:58:58 GMT, "(Pete Cresswell)" wrote:
RE/ The proper way... Reminds me of a guy I worked with at a summer camp that was gung-ho on "right-of-way" on the water. One day we had to motor out and pick him up - clinging to the wreckage of the sailboat he was in when some monster cruiser ran him and the boat over. He kept saying "But I had the right-of-way...". Yeah, and the sad thing is some other well-meaning indivuals perpetuate the "size=right of way" mentality by talking to the little guys and not the big guys. Great. JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"(Pete Cresswell)" wrote in message
RE/ The proper way... Reminds me of a guy I worked with at a summer camp that was gung-ho on "right-of-way" on the water. One day we had to motor out and pick him up - clinging to the wreckage of the sailboat he was in when some monster cruiser ran him and the boat over. He kept saying "But I had the right-of-way...". Do you know why sailboats have right of way over motored boats? It's because they can't maneouvre as quickly or as easily. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
RE/
Do you know why sailboats have right of way over motored boats? It's because they can't maneouvre as quickly or as easily. Tell that to the captain of a bazillion-ton cargo barge that: - Can't see *anything* within a quarter mile of the pilot's station because of vision shadow resulting from the height of the hip - *Might* be able to shop within about seven miles if he applied full reverse. -- PeteCresswell |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"(Pete Cresswell)" wrote: RE/ Do you know why sailboats have right of way over motored boats? It's because they can't maneouvre as quickly or as easily. Tell that to the captain of a bazillion-ton cargo barge that: - Can't see *anything* within a quarter mile of the pilot's station because of vision shadow resulting from the height of the hip - *Might* be able to shop within about seven miles if he applied full reverse. My friends at the US Naval Academy have always told me to navigate by the laws of gross tonnage. If it is bigger than you or can harm you physically, it has the right of way. Unfortunately most commuters drive this way...as in I can't see you, so stay out of my way! Swedesford Rd is a commuter route. Its not nice to slow down the soccer moms! HAND |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Road riding in Germany | tvd | Rides | 2 | October 1st 04 11:29 PM |
Santa Cruz & Loma Prieta | [email protected] | Rides | 0 | September 5th 04 05:49 AM |
Riding on abandoned rail road tracks | Micheal Artindale | Mountain Biking | 10 | June 22nd 04 04:44 PM |
Cycle Event Director criminally liable for Competitor's death | Snoopy | Racing | 78 | September 10th 03 02:55 AM |
FAQ | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 27 | September 5th 03 10:58 PM |