|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
Hey,
As I mentioned in an earlier post I'm in the market for a new carbon fork. I'm focusing mostly on forks with aluminum steerers but I'm also interested in forks with Ti steerers. The more I learn about titanium and its use in the bicycle industry, the less flawless of a material it seems to be. Weight limits on Ti pedal spindles, flexy feel, arguably not a good material to use with certain fastners, etc. It's still a compelling material to study however, and I'm interested in knowing if it makes for a good steer tube material (i.e., does it tend to have tight torque specs. for the clamp bolts, what's it longevity like, does it have its own unique dangers when cutting the tube to length, etc.). All and all if I'm concerned about strength, reliability, and safety the most am I better off with an aluminum steerer or ti. Thanks, D. Ualp |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
D. Ualp wrote:
Hey, As I mentioned in an earlier post I'm in the market for a new carbon fork. I'm focusing mostly on forks with aluminum steerers but I'm also interested in forks with Ti steerers. The more I learn about titanium and its use in the bicycle industry, the less flawless of a material it seems to be. Weight limits on Ti pedal spindles, flexy feel, arguably not a good material to use with certain fastners, etc. It's still a compelling material to study however, and I'm interested in knowing if it makes for a good steer tube material (i.e., does it tend to have tight torque specs. for the clamp bolts, what's it longevity like, does it have its own unique dangers when cutting the tube to length, etc.). All and all if I'm concerned about strength, reliability, and safety the most am I better off with an aluminum steerer or ti. Thanks, Ti is between aluminium and steel in weight, strength and stiffness terms. Like steel, it has a fatigue limit (a cyclical stress limit below which it should last indefinitely). Its main advantage in a steerer tube would be good corrosion resistance. You can make a nice frame from Ti if the tube diameters are specified to make the most of the material (somewhere between Al and steel tube diameters), but as the dimensions of a steerer tube are limited to 1" or 1 1/8", there's no real room for manoeuvre. Ti is *notoriously* hard to cut and will blunt saw blades very quickly. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 00:57:37 -0700, "D. Ualp"
wrote: Hey, As I mentioned in an earlier post I'm in the market for a new carbon fork. I'm focusing mostly on forks with aluminum steerers but I'm also interested in forks with Ti steerers. D. Ualp Did I miss something? Why don't you like carbon steerers? Kinky Cowboy* *Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts Your milage may vary |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
"D. Ualp" wrote:
As I mentioned in an earlier post I'm in the market for a new carbon fork. I'm focusing mostly on forks with aluminum steerers but I'm also interested in forks with Ti steerers. Neither of those materials are as good a choice as dumb old steel for a steer tube. The reason for this is that steel is stiffest of the three, which matters a great deal when the size of a component is fixed, as in a steer tube. Other frame tubes can be enlarged to take advantage of the low density of Ti or aluminum, but a steer tube can only be one certain diameter, dictated by the headset standard being used. In order to win back some of the stiffness that was lost in going to an aluminum or Ti steerer, it must be made thicker, which negates much of the weight advantage of those materials. By the time you are at the same weight as the steel part, the stiffness is still not equal to that of the steel part. One example of this effect is that a one inch steel steer tube is slightly stiffer than a solid one inch aluminum rod of the same length, despite being quite a bit lighter. To attain the same stiffness with the same wall thickness as the steel steerer, the aluminum one would have to be 1.4" in diameter--which means that using a 1.125" steerer still doesn't help much. If you want flex built into the front end of your bike, let it be in the fork legs, where it won't interfere with lateral stability or proper operation of the headset bearings. The steerer should be stiff. Chalo Colina |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 19:19:25 -0400, John Forrest Tomlinson
wrote: On 8 Aug 2004 16:04:28 -0700, (Chalo) wrote: "D. Ualp" wrote: As I mentioned in an earlier post I'm in the market for a new carbon fork. I'm focusing mostly on forks with aluminum steerers but I'm also interested in forks with Ti steerers. Neither of those materials are as good a choice as dumb old steel for a steer tube. The reason for this is that steel is stiffest of the three, which matters a great deal when the size of a component is fixed, as in a steer tube. I don't understand how a steerer tube can flex much at all. Do they? JT Here's a quick drawing; top lower wheel bearing bearing axle V V =================================== /\ Now push back (down on the drawing) on the axle (equivalent to braking load) and you can see the fork will take a curve which moves the middle of the steerer tube forward (up on the drawing) from it's neutral position. Reverse the arrows to show the equivalent of the load imposed by the weight of the bike/rider Kinky Cowboy* *Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts Your milage may vary |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote in message . ..
On 8 Aug 2004 16:04:28 -0700, (Chalo) wrote: "D. Ualp" wrote: As I mentioned in an earlier post I'm in the market for a new carbon fork. I'm focusing mostly on forks with aluminum steerers but I'm also interested in forks with Ti steerers. Neither of those materials are as good a choice as dumb old steel for a steer tube. The reason for this is that steel is stiffest of the three, which matters a great deal when the size of a component is fixed, as in a steer tube. I don't understand how a steerer tube can flex much at all. Do they? JT It could be my imagination but I've had a Ti steerer fork that flexed so much I swore I could see the stem move down a few degrees when I used the front cantilever brakes when doing a test before riding. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
I don't understand how a steerer tube can flex much at all. Do they? Oh you bet. Sight down your fork while you grab some front brakes and see for yourself. I have bent far too many forks to keep count of, and most of them bent above the headset crown race. In order to fail there it must first be flexed to its failure point. Chalo Colina |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Reliability of Steerer Materials
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Steerer too long | dannyfrankszzz | UK | 4 | July 13th 04 01:55 AM |