|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
Per (PeteCresswell):
What I got from him was that once one exceeds 6'3" in height, off-the-shelf solutions are not going to fit. Written in haste.... I should amend that to "... off-the-shelf solutions are not going to fit perfectly." I've got four bikes. They all fit more-or-less, and they're all off-the-shelf (one I ordered as "custom", but the measurements just happened to turn out exactly the same as their off-the-shelf "XL" or "XXL" size - can't recall which and the frame's been discontinued). -- PeteCresswell |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
In article ,
SMS wrote: I don't think the issue here is saving a few bucks from Bikes Direct versus going to an LBS, it's that there are no new, non-compact, large frame, road bicycles sold by any shop in the U.S. anymore. That's hardly true, Steven. Maybe that's just the situation around your house, but my LBS has a nice selection of non-compact big framed bikes on hand (as well as some "compact" ones too). But their product line mix is not aimed at racers and wannabe racers like most shops. There's not a scrap of CF in the store, for one thing. -- Faith is believing what you know ain't so. -Mark Twain |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
Kyle Bramblesglarb wrote:
Thanks for all the advice. I'm a little discouraged that I can't just go into a store and put down $1,000 to get something brand new in the right size. I really didn't want to get into ordering stuff online and parting together a bike. There's a lot of things to take into consideration on this thread, so I'm thinking on it. I really don't want to buy a frame on eBay and peice stuff together. I don't know how to fix this stuff myself and I don't want keeping the bike operational to be a constantly ongoing effort. It's going to be hard enough for me to find time to ride, let alone hot-rod around with tweaking it. The benefit to buying a new bike from my local shop is that they'll fit and re-fit it for me and give it free lifetime tuneups. I'm using the bike this year to train and my end goal is to complete the Seagull Century in October. Even though I'm really large, does anybody here think a 62cm or 64cm compact will be "good enough" to not kill my back or knees? I'm not going to ride it across Europe or anything, just around Maryland. Before taking that plunge into a compromised fit, see if there is a Gunnar dealer near you: http://gunnarbikes.com/site/shops/ -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
Tim McNamara wrote:
In article , SMS wrote: I don't think the issue here is saving a few bucks from Bikes Direct versus going to an LBS, it's that there are no new, non-compact, large frame, road bicycles sold by any shop in the U.S. anymore. That's hardly true, Steven. Maybe that's just the situation around your house, but my LBS has a nice selection of non-compact big framed bikes on hand (as well as some "compact" ones too). But their product line mix is not aimed at racers and wannabe racers like most shops. There's not a scrap of CF in the store, for one thing. So what are the makes and models of those non-compact big frame bicycles? I'm sure the original poster would love to know this information. I sure haven't seen such an animal in any of the shops in my area. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
SMS wrote:
Peter Cole wrote: If you're not interested in racing or fast club riding, consider a touring bike, they're generally a bit nicer for tall people. Other than that, a competent bike shop should be able to get you comfortable on a frame that's a bit smaller than ideal. Mountain bike seat posts are plenty long enough, there's just the problem of getting the bars to a comfortable height and "reach" (the distance from the saddle, so you're not scrunched up). There are always extra long seat posts, steer-tube extenders, and longer stems. But if it's at all possible, it's better to get a larger frame so the use of these devices is limited. They do affect (negatively) the ride quality. I don't think the issue here is saving a few bucks from Bikes Direct versus going to an LBS, it's that there are no new, non-compact, large frame, road bicycles sold by any shop in the U.S. anymore. Anything you buy from an LBS is going to require some creative (and non-free) modifications to make it work. Here's what the o.p. needs: "http://sfbay.craigslist.org/scz/bik/1638512330.html" Which planet was that again? Gunnar builds to 68cm stock, larger customs 4 to 6 weeks. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
In article ,
SMS wrote: Tim McNamara wrote: In article , SMS wrote: I don't think the issue here is saving a few bucks from Bikes Direct versus going to an LBS, it's that there are no new, non-compact, large frame, road bicycles sold by any shop in the U.S. anymore. That's hardly true, Steven. Maybe that's just the situation around your house, but my LBS has a nice selection of non-compact big framed bikes on hand (as well as some "compact" ones too). But their product line mix is not aimed at racers and wannabe racers like most shops. There's not a scrap of CF in the store, for one thing. So what are the makes and models of those non-compact big frame bicycles? I'm sure the original poster would love to know this information. I sure haven't seen such an animal in any of the shops in my area. I'm sorry you live somewhere that is so benighted. Two brands available there, off the top of my head, include Rivendell and Gunnar, both of which make frames up to 66 or 68 cm. They've had a Soma frame or two, IIRC, and they go up to 66 cm. Tall bikes not that hard to find, although a lot of bike shops won't stock them for fear of never selling the things. Someone who is 6'6" or 6'10" is a fairly rare customer, after all. -- Faith is believing what you know ain't so. -Mark Twain |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
Tim McNamara wrote:
In article , SMS wrote: Tim McNamara wrote: In article , SMS wrote: I don't think the issue here is saving a few bucks from Bikes Direct versus going to an LBS, it's that there are no new, non-compact, large frame, road bicycles sold by any shop in the U.S. anymore. That's hardly true, Steven. Maybe that's just the situation around your house, but my LBS has a nice selection of non-compact big framed bikes on hand (as well as some "compact" ones too). But their product line mix is not aimed at racers and wannabe racers like most shops. There's not a scrap of CF in the store, for one thing. So what are the makes and models of those non-compact big frame bicycles? I'm sure the original poster would love to know this information. I sure haven't seen such an animal in any of the shops in my area. I'm sorry you live somewhere that is so benighted. Two brands available there, off the top of my head, include Rivendell and Gunnar, both of which make frames up to 66 or 68 cm. They've had a Soma frame or two, IIRC, and they go up to 66 cm. Tall bikes not that hard to find, although a lot of bike shops won't stock them for fear of never selling the things. Someone who is 6'6" or 6'10" is a fairly rare customer, after all. I think both bikes are well outside the OP's stated price range. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
The Gunnar bike frames look very nice. It's good to know that they
make something for large sizes. But you're right, Peter, the frame alone costs about what the budget for my whole bike is. My local bike shop has a fitting station contraption, so I'm going to head down there this weekend and see what they say my geometry needs are. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
Per Kyle Bramblesglarb:
The Gunnar bike frames look very nice. It's good to know that they make something for large sizes. But you're right, Peter, the frame alone costs about what the budget for my whole bike is. I looked at Gunnar's "Ruffian" SS frame: $1,125 off-the-shelf... Sheesh! My Surly 1x1 was a little under $300 with fork/shipping/taxes/chasing & facing the BB shell. I had to do some cruel and unusual things to the Surly to get a comfortable fit... but it seems tb working for me. The Ruffian is nicer - especially the disc mount locations that don't contend with a luggage rack.... but, in the context of my own budget, it's not $800+ nicer. -- PeteCresswell |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
6'6" beginner rider wonders: 62cm or 64cm Trek frame?
In article ,
Peter Cole wrote: Tim McNamara wrote: In article , SMS wrote: Tim McNamara wrote: In article , SMS wrote: I don't think the issue here is saving a few bucks from Bikes Direct versus going to an LBS, it's that there are no new, non-compact, large frame, road bicycles sold by any shop in the U.S. anymore. That's hardly true, Steven. Maybe that's just the situation around your house, but my LBS has a nice selection of non-compact big framed bikes on hand (as well as some "compact" ones too). But their product line mix is not aimed at racers and wannabe racers like most shops. There's not a scrap of CF in the store, for one thing. So what are the makes and models of those non-compact big frame bicycles? I'm sure the original poster would love to know this information. I sure haven't seen such an animal in any of the shops in my area. I'm sorry you live somewhere that is so benighted. Two brands available there, off the top of my head, include Rivendell and Gunnar, both of which make frames up to 66 or 68 cm. They've had a Soma frame or two, IIRC, and they go up to 66 cm. Tall bikes not that hard to find, although a lot of bike shops won't stock them for fear of never selling the things. Someone who is 6'6" or 6'10" is a fairly rare customer, after all. I think both bikes are well outside the OP's stated price range. Well, he may be stuck there given his size. At 6'4", which is really not that unusual since I see a *lot* of people my height when out in public places, I have a hard time finding stuff that fits properly (pants, shirts, shoes let alone biking equipment). For every inch taller than me, the options must get significantly fewer. If he really has to stay within that price range, he'd probably be best off looking for a used bike that's big enough on Craigslist or eBay (having a quick look just now I saw nothing larger than 62 cm, though). -- Faith is believing what you know ain't so. -Mark Twain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Miyata 1000LT 24" Frame 62cm | Jim | Marketplace | 0 | September 30th 06 05:17 AM |
Frame size for 6'9" rider? | Alan Mazer | Techniques | 6 | January 16th 06 01:37 PM |
FS: 62cm Trek 5500 with 9 spd DuraAce | Lou Deeter | Marketplace | 1 | May 10th 05 02:13 PM |
WTB: 63cm-64cm (25") road/race bike frame or built up --- Seattle Area | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | March 10th 05 05:36 PM |
WTB: 64cm touring bike or frame & fork | Jim | Marketplace | 1 | July 2nd 03 11:46 AM |