|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
I didn't think that drivers drove past red lights.
QUOTE: Network Rail has slammed the "shocking" Cottingham crash in which a driver collided with a level crossing after jumping a red light, causing traffic chaos. Warning other motorists to "follow the rules", the organisation warned that Thursday's incident could have had "fatal or life-changing consequences". A car collided with the barrier on the level crossing in Northgate as it was lowering with a train approaching at just before 8am on October 22, causing "gridlock" in the area. Hull Trains said trains between Beverley and London Kings Cross were delayed by 45 minutes because of the collision, which required Network Rail engineers to safely remove and replace the damaged barrier. Network Rail warned that the trains on that line travel at 70mph between Cottingham and Beverley and they cannot stop quickly or swerve out of the way.. Now Network Rail has said drivers should stop at level crossings and understand the warning lights and barriers. If the warnings activate, they must stop, unless it is unsafe to do so, remain stationary until all warnings stop and all barriers are raised, then check that the exit is clear on the other side before driving across. Richard Hayden, level crossing manager, said: "This incident in Cottingham is shocking. "The driver jumped the red lights to race through the barriers, causing significant damage to the level crossing, delays to train services and heavy traffic in the area – just to save a couple of minutes, instead of waiting until it was safe to cross. "Sadly, too many people ignore the warnings, and misusing level crossings could have fatal or life-changing consequences. "It is crucial that drivers are prepared to stop at level crossings, follow the rules and only continue to cross once it is safe to do so." https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote:
https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ....and the cycling relevance is? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM UTC+1, soup wrote:
On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ...and the cycling relevance is? None at all - it's all the car driver's fault! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
On 23/10/2020 18:02, Simon Mason wrote:
On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ...and the cycling relevance is? None at all So why post to uk.rec.cycling . |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 6:53:04 PM UTC+1, soup wrote:
On 23/10/2020 18:02, Simon Mason wrote: On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ...and the cycling relevance is? None at all So why post to uk.rec.cycling . Whooosshh |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 6:53:04 PM UTC+1, soup wrote:
On 23/10/2020 18:02, Simon Mason wrote: On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ...and the cycling relevance is? None at all So why post to uk.rec.cycling . So you agree that red light jumping has NOTHING to do with cycling at all? Well done. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlockedCottingham
On 23/10/2020 19:00, Simon Mason wrote:
On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 6:53:04 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 18:02, Simon Mason wrote: On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ...and the cycling relevance is? None at all So why post to uk.rec.cycling . Whooosshh Yes, it does seem to have gone over your head. So do you not have an answer to the question of what it has to do with uk.rec.cycling? There *is* a very obvious one; anything to do with road-users ignoring red traffic lights is relevant to ukrc. After all, the majority of such ofences are committed by people on bikes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlockedCottingham
On 23/10/2020 19:13, Simon Mason wrote:
On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 6:53:04 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 18:02, Simon Mason wrote: On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ...and the cycling relevance is? None at all So why post to uk.rec.cycling . So you agree that red light jumping has NOTHING to do with cycling at all? Well done. Where did I say that? Not following Simon? What I did ask was (paraphrased) "what has that article about cars getting trapped on level crossings got to do with cycling?" . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 15:30:26 UTC+1, wrote:
I didn't think that drivers drove past red lights. QUOTE: Network Rail has slammed the "shocking" Cottingham crash in which a driver collided with a level crossing after jumping a red light, causing traffic chaos. Warning other motorists to "follow the rules", the organisation warned that Thursday's incident could have had "fatal or life-changing consequences".. A car collided with the barrier on the level crossing in Northgate as it was lowering with a train approaching at just before 8am on October 22, causing "gridlock" in the area. Hull Trains said trains between Beverley and London Kings Cross were delayed by 45 minutes because of the collision, which required Network Rail engineers to safely remove and replace the damaged barrier. Network Rail warned that the trains on that line travel at 70mph between Cottingham and Beverley and they cannot stop quickly or swerve out of the way. Now Network Rail has said drivers should stop at level crossings and understand the warning lights and barriers. If the warnings activate, they must stop, unless it is unsafe to do so, remain stationary until all warnings stop and all barriers are raised, then check that the exit is clear on the other side before driving across. Richard Hayden, level crossing manager, said: "This incident in Cottingham is shocking. "The driver jumped the red lights to race through the barriers, causing significant damage to the level crossing, delays to train services and heavy traffic in the area – just to save a couple of minutes, instead of waiting until it was safe to cross. "Sadly, too many people ignore the warnings, and misusing level crossings could have fatal or life-changing consequences. "It is crucial that drivers are prepared to stop at level crossings, follow the rules and only continue to cross once it is safe to do so." https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section Nugent will tell us it is the train drivers responsibility to be able to stop in the distance he can see to be clear. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail in disbelief at level crossing stunt that gridlocked Cottingham
On Saturday, October 24, 2020 at 11:27:42 AM UTC+1, soup wrote:
On 23/10/2020 19:13, Simon Mason wrote: On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 6:53:04 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 18:02, Simon Mason wrote: On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM UTC+1, soup wrote: On 23/10/2020 15:30, Simon Mason wrote: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...mments-section ...and the cycling relevance is? None at all So why post to uk.rec.cycling . So you agree that red light jumping has NOTHING to do with cycling at all? Well done. Where did I say that? Not following Simon? What I did ask was (paraphrased) "what has that article about cars getting trapped on level crossings got to do with cycling?" . Again I say - this example of RLJ was NOTHING to do with cycling, but the driver damaged Network Rail infrastructure, meaning any cyclist would have to push their cycle over the nearby footbridge at the station. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cycling in London may fall as the rail network improves | Tom Crispin[_5_] | UK | 1 | January 22nd 16 12:29 PM |
Network Rail also cracking down on RLJs | Alycidon | UK | 13 | August 23rd 15 09:43 AM |
Cyclists:0 Level crossing:Loads | Mrcheerful | UK | 10 | July 23rd 15 09:29 AM |
Network Rail in Scotland still trying to prevent access | David Hansen | UK | 20 | February 17th 05 10:27 PM |
Addlestone Level Crossing closed next week. | Chris Gerhard | UK | 4 | February 14th 05 10:54 AM |