|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamos - obsolete?
The Rev Gaston wrote:
So why do people swear by them? Of course they avoid using batteries, so are more eco-friendly, and they're more difficult to steal, but apart from that? On a recent 200 audax I was lucky enough to get to ride side-by-side to a twin light SON setup, which provided excellent comparison with my twin cateye effort. I use two of the HL-EL500 lamps which are sold as 1000cdl and 30hr runtime off 4xAA. I don't think the SON setup was especially better, however I will eventually go SON and twin B&M LED lamps because: a) I don't like having the weight of two lights and eight AA's on my handlebar b) Despite my best efforts I ran out of batteries on my last audax c) the SON setup is WAY COOL which is enough reason to go that route alone d) I am suffering from what was recently explained to me as "hub envy". So, all I have to do now is get together the requisite £350 and get SON'd up.... BTW do B&M do under-BB blue neons???? bfn, Tony B |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamos - obsolete?
Tony B wrote: The Rev Gaston wrote: So why do people swear by them? Of course they avoid using batteries, so are more eco-friendly, and they're more difficult to steal, but apart from that? On a recent 200 audax I was lucky enough to get to ride side-by-side to a twin light SON setup, which provided excellent comparison with my twin cateye effort. I use two of the HL-EL500 lamps which are sold as 1000cdl and 30hr runtime off 4xAA. I don't think the SON setup was especially better, however I will eventually go SON and twin B&M LED lamps because: a) I don't like having the weight of two lights and eight AA's on my handlebar b) Despite my best efforts I ran out of batteries on my last audax c) the SON setup is WAY COOL which is enough reason to go that route alone d) I am suffering from what was recently explained to me as "hub envy". So, all I have to do now is get together the requisite £350 and get SON'd up.... BTW do B&M do under-BB blue neons???? bfn, Tony B £350 ? Shouldn'y cost that much. Hub is £110 from Kinetics, rim £20-30, build+spokes £25, lamp, B&M Lumotect+ mit standlicht £40 from Kinetics. Standlicht isn't essential nor is the switched version if you want to cut costs. I have a B&M D-Toplight mit standlicht on the rear too. If you want to go for two Lumotecs check out Marten Gerritsens (of this parish) site, seacrh for m-gineering. Schmidt E6s are more expensive and apparantly better but on Sunday my Lumotec plus my Ellipsoid plus Leos Lumotec Oval was perfectly good enough. Dynamos are better than battery lights because they don't need batteries. Finding a garage selling batteries in the Scottish Borders at 03:00 might be difficult. On my fixed I use the afor mentioned Sigma Ellipsoid and a Axa Basta rear lamp which is similar to the D-Toplight, not quite as good IMO but half the price |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dynamos - obsolete? | Simon Brooke | UK | 33 | December 23rd 05 02:52 PM |
Dynamos - obsolete? | Peter Clinch | UK | 3 | December 22nd 05 08:07 AM |
Dynamos - obsolete? | Ric | UK | 0 | December 22nd 05 06:16 AM |
Dynamos - obsolete? | Clive George | UK | 0 | December 21st 05 11:48 PM |
Dynamos - obsolete? | Nigel Cliffe | UK | 0 | December 21st 05 07:48 PM |