Lorry driver 'over limit and talking on mobile when he killed cyclist'

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...led-cyclist.do

On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-...

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her own
demise by being on the road.

Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-...

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her own
demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be alive, can
you disagree with that?

On Nov 10, 12:20*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-....

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her own
demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be alive, can
you disagree with that?

She was entitled to be there.
He was over the drink limit and should not have been there.
See the difference?

--
Simon Mason

Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 12:20 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-...

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her own
demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be
alive, can you disagree with that?

She was entitled to be there.
He was over the drink limit and should not have been there.
See the difference?

I cannot see the point of her exercising a right which got her killed. The
drink overlimit was trivial and probably had no actual effect on the driver.

On Nov 10, 11:24*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 12:20 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-....

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her own
demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be
alive, can you disagree with that?

She was entitled to be there.
He was over the drink limit and should not have been there.
See the difference?

I cannot see the point of her exercising a right which got her killed. * The
drink overlimit was trivial and probably had no actual effect on the driver.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Drink driving trivial?
Good job you are nowhere near the judicial system.
We'll see what sentence the driver eventually gets to see if they view
it as "trivial".

--
Simon Mason

Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 11:24 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 12:20 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-...

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her
own demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be
alive, can you disagree with that?

She was entitled to be there.
He was over the drink limit and should not have been there.
See the difference?

I cannot see the point of her exercising a right which got her
killed. The
drink overlimit was trivial and probably had no actual effect on the
driver.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Drink driving trivial?
Good job you are nowhere near the judicial system.
We'll see what sentence the driver eventually gets to see if they view
it as "trivial".

it is only a few years since that reading would have been legal. A regular
drinker will not show any effects from such a small amount 'over the limit'

On Nov 10, 11:46*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 11:24 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 12:20 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-...

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her
own demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be
alive, can you disagree with that?

She was entitled to be there.
He was over the drink limit and should not have been there.
See the difference?

I cannot see the point of her exercising a right which got her
killed. The
drink overlimit was trivial and probably had no actual effect on the
driver.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Drink driving trivial?
Good job you are nowhere near the judicial system.
We'll see what sentence the driver eventually gets to see if they view
it as "trivial".

it is only a few years since that reading would have been legal. *A regular
drinker will not show any effects from such a small amount 'over the limit'- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Won't wash with the beak, I'm afraid!
He'll get locked up.
Also, it used be be legal to use a mobile phone while driving.
I wonder if he could use that as an excuse as well?

--
Simon Mason

On Nov 10, 12:52*pm, Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 11:46*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:









Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 11:24 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 10, 12:20 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-...

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her
own demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be
alive, can you disagree with that?

She was entitled to be there.
He was over the drink limit and should not have been there.
See the difference?

I cannot see the point of her exercising a right which got her
killed. The
drink overlimit was trivial and probably had no actual effect on the
driver.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Drink driving trivial?
Good job you are nowhere near the judicial system.
We'll see what sentence the driver eventually gets to see if they view
it as "trivial".

it is only a few years since that reading would have been legal. *A regular
drinker will not show any effects from such a small amount 'over the limit'- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Won't wash with the beak, I'm afraid!
He'll get locked up.
Also, it used be be legal to use a mobile phone while driving.
I wonder if he could use that as an excuse as well?

--
Simon Mason

....extenuating circumstances....I didnt mean to do it.....etc...

On Nov 10, 12:20*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 9 nov, 17:56, Uncle Spam wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-lorry-driver-....

How horrendous.

The usual morons will assert that the cyclist contributed to her own
demise by being on the road.

of course, if she had not been there, she would probably still be alive, can
you disagree with that?

I can't. The best way to stay as safe as possible from dangerous
drivers is to stay at home, preferably away from road facing walls
which can sometimes be smashed by drivers who are out of control of
their vehicles.

She was wearing a hi-viz jacket too, which should have made her
completely free of danger. BTW, can a helmet resist the full weight
of lorry wheels? Maybe she didn't have a compulsory reflector or in
other ways was not 100% compliant with the law or Highway Code.

Any excuse.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.