|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
I submit that on or about Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:28:34 -0500, the person
known to the court as "Bob the Cow" made a statement in Your Honour's bundle) to the following effect: Anyone who is genuinely serious about preventing head injury while riding will be on a recumbent trike, where the risk is negligible, or a recumbent bike, where it is small. I note that in the US, at least, almost all recumbent riders wear helmets. Yes, even the few on recumbent trikes! To me, this is proof that the hat choice is based on some variant of fashion, not logic. Are you pretending that it's hard to crash a recumbent trike? No, just that it's a heck of a lot harder to achieve that 1.5m drop with the body disconnected, as per the standards :-) Ever changed direction in one unexpectedly due to "brake steering" at speed? Yep. And I've done handbrake turns on one as well :-) A LWB recumbent bicycle also has some weight-distribution issues as to front and back wheel which also predispose to occasional lack of control. Granted, it's not as far to fall as from a diamond-frame, but some of these things do get up to a respectable speed. All recumbent bikes, in my experience, go really quickly when they go. But they tend to dump you on your arse, not your head. Actually you can sometimes put your feet down and just drop the bike, remaining standing - I'd forgotten, that happened to me once, approaching a traffic light, the road turned out to be greasy due to an oil slick, the bike went down and I stood up and skated to a halt :-) If a person chooses not to wear a helmet, it's none of my business. Apparently you make it your business to question the judgment of anyone who DOES choose to wear a helmet by attacking their choice as illogical or susceptible to fashion. Strange bias, that. Please be assured that the limit of my caring whether anyone wears a helmet or not is as follows: * ill-informed advocacy (look for phrases like "organ donor" or the figure 85%) * in countries where governments are committed to legislation when wearing rates rise to the point that enforcement would not be problematic, helmet wearing may impact on the freedom of choice of others. I have read much of the evidence, so has Frank. I'm happy to discuss it in detail. I used to e an enthusiastic helmet advocate, I was challenged to read the evidence, and I recognise I was duped. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
I submit that on or about Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:22:55 -0500, the person
known to the court as "Bob the Cow" made a statement in Your Honour's bundle) to the following effect: Mind you, what would I know? I suffered a serious bicycle crash many years ago and wasn't wearing a helmet, so obviously I'm dead! No, dear boy -- not dead, but seriously addled. Apparently I must be. I put it down to the next crash, where I was wearing a helmet but was more seriously injured. Well, you must be athletic and know how to fall. It's good you're OK. You can take a joke too -- good on ya. Heh! I'm British, we are supposed to be able to take a joke :-) Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
Bob the Cow wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I note that in the US, at least, almost all recumbent riders wear helmets. Yes, even the few on recumbent trikes! To me, this is proof that the hat choice is based on some variant of fashion, not logic. Are you pretending that it's hard to crash a recumbent trike? Ever changed direction in one unexpectedly due to "brake steering" at speed? They aren't as stable as they look, and it's easy to become complacent. A LWB recumbent bicycle also has some weight-distribution issues as to front and back wheel which also predispose to occasional lack of control. Granted, it's not as far to fall as from a diamond-frame, but some of these things do get up to a respectable speed. Oh, I know they get very respectable speed! But ISTM that worrying about hitting your head in a recumbent crash is strange indeed. Despite the hype and handwringing, head impacts are vanishingly rare riding uprights. My bet is that they're much more rare on a recumbent. On a LWB recumbent, it's essentially impossible to go over the front. Even on a SWB, going over the front is slower than falling forward while walking. Sliding sideways typically puts you onto your hip, with an arm out for protection, and your head is starting out at a much lower height. How _does_ someone hit their head? Let me revise that question. Why not give us five or six examples of recumbent riders falling and hitting their heads badly, and tell us how it happened? Maybe we can learn something. If the danger is significant, examples should be easy to find. Apparently you make it your business to question the judgment of anyone who DOES choose to wear a helmet by attacking their choice as illogical or susceptible to fashion. Strange bias, that. My bias is this: I think ordinary cycling is safe enough that unusual protective gear isn't necessary. From 1890 until 1990, until Bell started pushing a commercial product, that was the almost universal opinion. In most of the world, it still is. From what I see, most pro-helmet decisions are not based on logic or data. I say this as a person that used to be pro-helmet, until I was convinced to examine the data and the "logic." Every once in a while a new example comes up, and I comment on it. Care for another? How about the ads showing four-year-old kids on plastic recumbent sidewalk trikes, riding three miles per hour with their heads about two feet above the ground, "safely" ensconced in helmets? How is that logical? IMO, this _is_ a fashion issue, in that most people who are wearing helmets are doing so because they see other people wearing helmets. It's given exactly as much analysis as wearing aerodynamic sunglasses. "Oooh, that's part of the proper look, too. And they might protect your eyes!!!" The difference is, Bolle' hasn't been smart enough to fund a "mandatory sunglasses" movement by Safe Kids and The Harborview Institute. But if they do, we'll see "scientific" papers claiming wearing sunglasses reduce blindness and other eye injuries by "up to 85%." And we'll have handwringing mommies in front of legislators saying "But if only _one_ child's eyesight can be saved..." - Frank Krygowski |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote in
: On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:08:38 -0400, wvantwiller wrote: And, as usual, I suppose your experience in your person medical practice, including all that trauma room experience during your internship and residence, give you better insights? I'm not the one making claims so I have no need to back anything up. JT PS -- unless the medical people you're talking about are comparing people who fell and were uninjured, I don't see how they could come to conclusions about helmets. Think about it. **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** http://www.bhsi.org/negativs.htm |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
wvantwiller wrote:
The doctor OBVIOUSLY figured that if the crash cause this type of injury with a helmet, he would have been in much more serious shape without it, probably more than just serious. So just how does this support the contention that a helmet is unimportant? Because that's what anti-helmet zealots /want/ to believe. HTH, Bill "letting a little line out" S. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:54:56 -0400, wvantwiller
wrote: The doctor OBVIOUSLY figured that if the crash cause this type of injury with a helmet, he would have been in much more serious shape without it, probably more than just serious. So just how does this support the contention that a helmet is unimportant? The doctors are only seeing people who are injured. It's an odd sampling of people, and not one to draw any general conclusions from. JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|