|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Bike fit for the comfort/utility/trekking/city-sports bike
Lou Holtman wrote:
[...] You know that Amsterdam is not in Denmark right?[...] Per Red Cloud, "Armsterdam" (sic) is in "Dutch". You mentioned the Rans Fusion[...] No, no, no! RANS is always in full caps. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Bike fit for the comfort/utility/trekking/city-sports bike
On Jan 26, 4:50*am, DougC wrote:
Andre already knows of them but the RANS crank-forward bikes are pretty nice for casual road/trail) riding, even longer-distance riding. RANS even has a low step-over model now, as well as an XL frame. Their drawbacks are a lack of touring capacity and the inability to stand while pedaling. The riding position is far more comfortable for casual use, but they are easy to ride and still look fairly normal. Well, I never stand up in the saddle anyway; that's a habit of people who came into cycling from racing. But fairly normal looks are probably good with the general market, if of no concern to me. A lot of people think that the Electra Townie is such a great idea--but the RANS bikes take every good idea of the Townie, and extend it several times as far. The RANS Fusion is the bike that the Electra Townie wants to be when it grows up. The RANS conception is definitely superior and better worked out. But the RANS folk are engineers, while the Electra folk are marketers; I knew this by merely looking at their products, before I made a single enquiry. Those two bunches of bike makers sell an entirely differerent zing to entirely different target markets. It is only when calmly thoughtful people like me with a relevant background (product development) start looking at both, as I did a few years ago, that anyone wishes the Townie folk would get a little more engineering and ergonomic clout behind the design of their bikes (and upgrading the quality of the components would really help too!), and the RANS folk would pay a little more attention to their presentation. Not that it matters; the ones who care about both elements are too few to constitute even a niche market, and can probably afford to buy something a bit more exclusive than either. I went away and got a custom bike because I couldn't bear to ride the RANS welded frames. But it is a good joke just to try imagining me explaining to the boss of RANS that he should make a special bike for me with 622 wheels because I want to try the best available selfcontained suspension of the widest Big Apples, and develop a lugged frame because I'm more sensitive to ugliness of welding than his pal Liddell Tommi (who first drew my attention to this maker of super-ergonomic bikes), and put special frame ends on it for me because I thought it might be nice to try a Rohloff box. Andre Jute Visit Jute on Amps at http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/ "wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio constructor" John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare "an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of wisdom" Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Front Sus: Utility Bike? | (PeteCresswell) | Techniques | 3 | October 7th 08 11:13 PM |
Utility, err, utensil bike in Africa | Marc Brett | UK | 6 | June 25th 07 08:38 AM |
Best utility bike wheel size? | Rory Williams[_2_] | Australia | 1 | March 20th 07 03:11 AM |
A good utility bike | Tom or Mary | General | 2 | August 13th 05 12:03 AM |
Utility bike advice please | zaphod | UK | 3 | June 24th 04 09:02 PM |