|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
http://www.grough.co.uk/magazine/2013/06/03/peak-district-rangers-take-to-mountain-bikes-in-first-for-national-park
In Yosemite you rarely see rangers on some trails anymore, there's just no way with reduced funding that the rangers can cover the area they used to. Horses are very destructive to the trails and very expensive to maintain. Mountain bike patrols would be ideal, especially now that mountain biking is expanding in National Parks. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Thursday, June 6, 2013 9:56:55 AM UTC-7, sms wrote:
http://www.grough.co.uk/magazine/2013/06/03/peak-district-rangers-take-to-mountain-bikes-in-first-for-national-park In Yosemite you rarely see rangers on some trails anymore, there's just no way with reduced funding that the rangers can cover the area they used to. Horses are very destructive to the trails and very expensive to maintain. Mountain bike patrols would be ideal, especially now that mountain biking is expanding in National Parks. Oh, sure, if they want to end up DEAD! Park rangers are supposed to be role models, so exhibiting behavior that is destructive to the parks wouldn't be appropriate. I guess that reasoning is over your head.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Thursday, June 6, 2013 5:56:55 PM UTC+1, sms wrote:
http://www.grough.co.uk/magazine/2013/06/03/peak-district-rangers-take-to-mountain-bikes-in-first-for-national-park In Yosemite you rarely see rangers on some trails anymore, there's just no way with reduced funding that the rangers can cover the area they used to. Horses are very destructive to the trails and very expensive to maintain. Mountain bike patrols would be ideal, especially now that mountain biking is expanding in National Parks. That's a very good idea. We already have that in some UK national parks and it works very well. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
Oh, sure, if they want to end up DEAD! Park rangers are supposed to be role models, so exhibiting behavior that is destructive to the parks wouldn't be appropriate. I guess that reasoning is over your head.... I guess you forgot the 0.00123 fatalities per million miles statistic we discussed ? Mountain Biking is, statistically, very safe indeed. And how on earth do you justify preferring a ton or more of horse hitting the trails as opposed to a 25lb mountain bike ? It's way LESS destructive than having them on horses. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs toDo the Same!
On 6/7/2013 5:02 AM, Blackblade wrote:
Oh, sure, if they want to end up DEAD! Park rangers are supposed to be role models, so exhibiting behavior that is destructive to the parks wouldn't be appropriate. I guess that reasoning is over your head.... I guess you forgot the 0.00123 fatalities per million miles statistic we discussed ? Mountain Biking is, statistically, very safe indeed. And how on earth do you justify preferring a ton or more of horse hitting the trails as opposed to a 25lb mountain bike ? It's way LESS destructive than having them on horses. Remember, the reason that horses are so destructive is not just the weight of the horse and the trail damage, it's also the waste products. "BLM (Bureau of Land Management) routinely receives complaints about horse waste, horse damage to trails, or general equestrian etiquette." You're already seeing some places ban horses because of trail damage and horse waste, but the equestrians are a powerful group because they tend to be wealthy. It's amazing that dog owners are required to pick up after their animals on trails, but horse owners are not. Every study that compares trail damage of different users has shown that hikers and mountain bikers cause about the same amount of trail damage, while equestrians much more damage. I.e., a 1994 study out of the University of Vermont concluded "horses produced significantly larger quantities of sediment compared to hikers, off-road bicycles, and motorcycles." Of course this was a detailed, scientifically conducted, peer-reviewed study! Amusingly, one of Vandeman's supporters, Terri Sweet is an equestrian so he is unwilling to face the facts regarding the damage horses do to trails even though all the experts agree that horses are far more destructive to trails than bicycle tires or Vibram soled boots. What is also interesting is that "heavily laden hikers" (backpackers) actually cause _more_ trail damage than bicycles. "Mountain bikers will exert a downward force through their tyres which comprises the wheel load divided by the contact area, is likely to be less than that of heavier motorized vehicles, horses, and heavily laden hikers." This doesn't mean we should ban backpacking to protect trails, but at least it does show that continuing to expand mountain bike access to the wilderness won't have any negative effects if the number of users doesn't increase. The issue is that, as it stands now, day users don't need wilderness permits and mountain bikers are more likely to be day users, while backpackers are overnight users and need wilderness permits and the numbers are limited. However this could be solved by requiring day use permits for all trail users in wilderness areas. The key thing is education. Personally I was hoping that part of Vandeman's sentencing for the crimes he was convicted of would have included some sort of environmental education requirement because he needs to be educated on issues like wilderness impacts. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Friday, June 7, 2013 9:30:19 AM UTC-7, sms wrote:
On 6/7/2013 5:02 AM, Blackblade wrote: Oh, sure, if they want to end up DEAD! Park rangers are supposed to be role models, so exhibiting behavior that is destructive to the parks wouldn't be appropriate. I guess that reasoning is over your head.... I guess you forgot the 0.00123 fatalities per million miles statistic we discussed ? Mountain Biking is, statistically, very safe indeed. And how on earth do you justify preferring a ton or more of horse hitting the trails as opposed to a 25lb mountain bike ? It's way LESS destructive than having them on horses. Remember, the reason that horses are so destructive is not just the weight of the horse and the trail damage, it's also the waste products. Horses don't damage nature; they are PART of nature. DUH! Bikes, of course, are not. "BLM (Bureau of Land Management) routinely receives complaints about horse waste, horse damage to trails, or general equestrian etiquette." You're already seeing some places ban horses because of trail damage and horse waste, but the equestrians are a powerful group because they tend to be wealthy. It's amazing that dog owners are required to pick up after their animals on trails, but horse owners are not. Dogs are an exotic species. Horses are native to North America. In fact, the horse evolved there. Every study that compares trail damage of different users has shown that hikers and mountain bikers cause about the same amount of trail damage, BS. You are referring to junk science written by mountain bikers. No surprise there! while equestrians much more damage. I.e., a 1994 study out of the University of Vermont concluded "horses produced significantly larger quantities of sediment compared to hikers, off-road bicycles, and motorcycles." Of course this was a detailed, scientifically conducted, peer-reviewed study! BS. Junk science. Not worth the paper it was written on. Amusingly, one of Vandeman's supporters, Terri Sweet is an equestrian so he is unwilling to face the facts regarding the damage horses do to trails even though all the experts agree that horses are far more destructive to trails than bicycle tires or Vibram soled boots. What is also interesting is that "heavily laden hikers" (backpackers) actually cause _more_ trail damage than bicycles. "Mountain bikers will exert a downward force through their tyres which comprises the wheel load divided by the contact area, is likely to be less than that of heavier motorized vehicles, horses, and heavily laden hikers." This doesn't mean we should ban backpacking to protect trails, but at least it does show that continuing to expand mountain bike access to the wilderness won't have any negative effects if the number of users doesn't increase. The issue is that, as it stands now, day users don't need wilderness permits and mountain bikers are more likely to be day users, while backpackers are overnight users and need wilderness permits and the numbers are limited. However this could be solved by requiring day use permits for all trail users in wilderness areas. The key thing is education. Personally I was hoping that part of Vandeman's sentencing for the crimes he was convicted of would have included some sort of environmental education requirement because he needs to be educated on issues like wilderness impacts. You need to be educated on how to tell the truth (I know, you are uneducable). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs toDo the Same!
On 6/7/2013 5:02 AM, Blackblade wrote:
I guess you forgot the 0.00123 fatalities per million miles statistic we discussed ? Mountain Biking is, statistically, very safe indeed. Per mile, it's one of the safest activities available. Per hour, it's still pretty good, but less safe than walking. Of course it's not necessary that everything be perfectly safe for everyone. I think the key takeaway is that in terms of both safety and environmental impact, mountain biking is one of the best activities to encourage. What would be good is if Vandeman could be educated to direct his efforts to working against activities that actually do have a negative impact, including horseback riding and motorized vehicles and motorized boats. For that to happen he would have to abandon his addiction to junk science and open his mind to scientifically sound, peer-reviewed, studies. But since he's a promoter of junk science, that's just not going to happen. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Saturday, June 8, 2013 11:50:35 AM UTC-7, sms wrote:
On 6/7/2013 5:02 AM, Blackblade wrote: I guess you forgot the 0.00123 fatalities per million miles statistic we discussed ? Mountain Biking is, statistically, very safe indeed. Per mile, it's one of the safest activities available. Per hour, it's still pretty good, but less safe than walking. Of course it's not necessary that everything be perfectly safe for everyone. I think the key takeaway is that in terms of both safety and environmental impact, mountain biking is one of the best activities to encourage. What would be good is if Vandeman could be educated to direct his efforts to working against activities that actually do have a negative impact, including horseback riding and motorized vehicles and motorized boats. For that to happen he would have to abandon his addiction to junk science and open his mind to scientifically sound, peer-reviewed, studies. But since he's a promoter of junk science, that's just not going to happen. Mountain biking is by far the most damaging activity allowed in any park. Horses don't "damage" nature, they ARE nature -- just like the deer. I know that's over your head. Have your mommie explain it to you. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
Nice try old chap. I have to ask was your Phd in creation science? I wouldn't be surprised if it was. I am sure your views would be welcomed by the flat earth society.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
By the way where is your peer reviewed scientific evidence showing mountain biking is the most damaging activity in Any park? This is another example of your ignorance of science. Why? You have clearly reached a conclusion without doing any field research.
Please don't give me that link to your article on your website again old chap. It is hardly a meaningful scholarly contribution to the field of environmental management. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Bikers Destroying Jasper National Park, Canada | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 1 | November 11th 08 12:14 PM |
Bicycling the trailridge in the Rocky Mountain National Park... | Fer | General | 7 | January 30th 08 09:07 PM |
Biking in the Rocky Mountain National Park??? | Fer | General | 4 | November 4th 07 02:06 PM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 8 | March 18th 07 06:24 AM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 6 | March 16th 07 03:35 AM |