A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cycle trailer: good?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 25th 08, 10:51 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
PhilD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 152
Default Cycle trailer: good?

Dear all

We (my wife and I) are considering getting a load-bearing trailer for
such duties as carrying shopping. We specifically want something that
will fix easily to almost any cycle we care to ride. Seat-post mounts
are not suitable as there is not enough post available on some of our
bikes.

We have ruled out the Bob Yak, as this requires fiddling with quick
release skewers, and two bikes I may want to use as "tractors" have
hub gears.

So, with this in mind, what does the team think of the Phillips Mule?
I am aware that later versions need to share the left hand axle nut,
but we could get an earlier version that clamps to the frame in front
of the axle.

Thanks for your thoughts.

PhilD

--

Ads
  #2  
Old February 25th 08, 01:42 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Craig Wallace
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 125
Default Cycle trailer: good?

PhilD wrote:
Dear all

We (my wife and I) are considering getting a load-bearing trailer for
such duties as carrying shopping. We specifically want something that
will fix easily to almost any cycle we care to ride. Seat-post mounts
are not suitable as there is not enough post available on some of our
bikes.

We have ruled out the Bob Yak, as this requires fiddling with quick
release skewers, and two bikes I may want to use as "tractors" have
hub gears.


You can buy 'Bob Nutz' - these replace the nuts on the hub gears and let
you attach the trailer. If you get a set for each bike you want to use
the trailer with it doesn't take long to clip the trailer on. Though
they're a bit expensive for what they are.
Though a 2 wheel trailer is possibly a better option for shopping etc.

So, with this in mind, what does the team think of the Phillips Mule?
I am aware that later versions need to share the left hand axle nut,
but we could get an earlier version that clamps to the frame in front
of the axle.


No idea about the Mule. You could also look at the Carry Freedom
trailers. They use a bracket that attaches to one side of the axle, they
say its compatible with nutted axles or QRs. And their trailers come
with 3 hitches as standard, so you could leave one on each bike.

Craig
  #3  
Old February 25th 08, 03:30 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Just zis Guy, you know?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,612
Default Cycle trailer: good?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:42:46 GMT, Craig Wallace
said in
:

a 2 wheel trailer is possibly a better option for shopping etc.


Agree with this. A heavily or high loaded BoB tends to snake.


(Badgerbadgerbadger...)

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
  #4  
Old February 25th 08, 03:39 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Chris Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default Cycle trailer: good?

PhilD wrote:

So, with this in mind, what does the team think of the Phillips Mule?
I am aware that later versions need to share the left hand axle nut,
but we could get an earlier version that clamps to the frame in front
of the axle.


I have one of the earlier versions.

In general, I've had good experiences with it. It can handle a full
supermarket trolley's worth of stuff; including some heavies like tinned
pet-food trays, multipacks of drinks and so on; probably in the order of
25/30Kg. Given that I normally tow it with a fixed gear bike, anything
more than that in weight is likely to melt my knees

One problem I've had is it's ability to turn over when empty. I hit a
pothole with it a couple of weeks ago, and it managed to turn right
over. This in turn pulled the offset towing arm into the rear wheel and
mangled a couple of spokes and put the wheel well out of true.

So - treat with caution when empty, otherwise a good worker.

Oh - and tape your stay where the clamp fixes on. Although the clamp
does have a plastic cushion, this splits and wears, and can lead to
paint scraping of the stay. Insulating or duct tape is fine.

Also - fit a kick stand to your bike of you can - much more convenient!

HTH
Chris
  #5  
Old February 25th 08, 07:27 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Tom Crispin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,229
Default Cycle trailer: good?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:51:23 -0800 (PST), PhilD
wrote:

Dear all

We (my wife and I) are considering getting a load-bearing trailer for
such duties as carrying shopping. We specifically want something that
will fix easily to almost any cycle we care to ride. Seat-post mounts
are not suitable as there is not enough post available on some of our
bikes.

We have ruled out the Bob Yak, as this requires fiddling with quick
release skewers, and two bikes I may want to use as "tractors" have
hub gears.

So, with this in mind, what does the team think of the Phillips Mule?
I am aware that later versions need to share the left hand axle nut,
but we could get an earlier version that clamps to the frame in front
of the axle.

Thanks for your thoughts.


Carry Freedom Y-Frame. Simple, lightish, versatile, excellent hub
hitch. You will need a socket for each bike, unless you want to waste
time switching them over.

http://www.carryfreedom.com/
  #6  
Old February 25th 08, 08:20 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Tosspot[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 769
Default Cycle trailer: good?

PhilD wrote:
Dear all

We (my wife and I) are considering getting a load-bearing trailer for
such duties as carrying shopping. We specifically want something that
will fix easily to almost any cycle we care to ride. Seat-post mounts
are not suitable as there is not enough post available on some of our
bikes.

We have ruled out the Bob Yak, as this requires fiddling with quick
release skewers, and two bikes I may want to use as "tractors" have
hub gears.

So, with this in mind, what does the team think of the Phillips Mule?
I am aware that later versions need to share the left hand axle nut,
but we could get an earlier version that clamps to the frame in front
of the axle.

Thanks for your thoughts.


I have an uber cheepy two wheel trailer that cost me about 30 squids.
Seat post hitch.

Pretty much like this;

http://www.bikesandtrailers.com/bike...nd_bigboy.html

I have to say, for basic shopping it's paid for itself a million times
over. It fits two beer crates exactly.
  #7  
Old February 26th 08, 01:07 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
David Damerell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,863
Default Cycle trailer: good?

Quoting Craig Wallace :
No idea about the Mule. You could also look at the Carry Freedom
trailers. They use a bracket that attaches to one side of the axle, they
say its compatible with nutted axles or QRs. And their trailers come
with 3 hitches as standard, so you could leave one on each bike.


I have one of these and am quite content with it. They were perfectly
willing to send me three extra hitches, since I have a silly number of
bicycles.
--
David Damerell Oil is for sissies
Today is Stilday, February - a weekend.
  #8  
Old February 26th 08, 02:02 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Brian G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 312
Default Cycle trailer: good?

PhilD wrote:
Dear all

We (my wife and I) are considering getting a load-bearing trailer for
such duties as carrying shopping. We specifically want something that
will fix easily to almost any cycle we care to ride. Seat-post mounts
are not suitable as there is not enough post available on some of our
bikes.

We have ruled out the Bob Yak, as this requires fiddling with quick
release skewers, and two bikes I may want to use as "tractors" have
hub gears.

So, with this in mind, what does the team think of the Phillips Mule?
I am aware that later versions need to share the left hand axle nut,
but we could get an earlier version that clamps to the frame in front
of the axle.


When I posted with this query about a year ago, I got no replies. (You
obviously have greater NG charisma ;-) )

Assuming this meant that the Mule was either unknown or dud, I opted for
the rather more expensive Burley Flatbed trailer. It's a very good
trailer and is very flexible, because unlike the Mule it doesn't have a
box, but merely a flat bed (hence the name!) with tie-down straps. I
use a couple of cheap plastic crates to carry my shopping and so one. I
like the trailer very much, but I guess it won't suit you because the
hitch attaches to the bike by the rear axle nut.


--
Brian G
www.wetwo.co.uk
  #9  
Old February 26th 08, 08:42 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Cycle trailer: good?

On Feb 26, 2:02 pm, Brian G wrote:
PhilD wrote:
Dear all


We (my wife and I) are considering getting a load-bearing trailer for
such duties as carrying shopping. We specifically want something that
will fix easily to almost any cycle we care to ride. Seat-post mounts
are not suitable as there is not enough post available on some of our
bikes.


We have ruled out the Bob Yak, as this requires fiddling with quick
release skewers, and two bikes I may want to use as "tractors" have
hub gears.


So, with this in mind, what does the team think of the Phillips Mule?
I am aware that later versions need to share the left hand axle nut,
but we could get an earlier version that clamps to the frame in front
of the axle.


When I posted with this query about a year ago, I got no replies. (You
obviously have greater NG charisma ;-) )

Assuming this meant that the Mule was either unknown or dud, I opted for
the rather more expensive Burley Flatbed trailer. It's a very good
trailer and is very flexible, because unlike the Mule it doesn't have a
box, but merely a flat bed (hence the name!) with tie-down straps. I
use a couple of cheap plastic crates to carry my shopping and so one. I
like the trailer very much, but I guess it won't suit you because the
hitch attaches to the bike by the rear axle nut.

--
Brian Gwww.wetwo.co.uk


I just bought the Mule from ebay. Unfortunately, I didn't take
insurance and the coupling device / hitch / clamp was lost in postage.
What a nightmare to find a part for it. I've read that one can use
burley parts on them but this defies the purpose of going for a
cheaper trailer with more expensive or even no replacement parts.
Granted they are cheaper & slightly bigger than some, it seems ok
initially. If I could do it over though, I would go for a Croozer
Travel or Burley Flatbed (£100 more expensive). I learned yet again,
you get what you pay for!

btw. if someone could point me in the direction of finding a clamp
with a black knob, I'd appreciate greatly it
  #10  
Old February 27th 08, 07:58 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
PhilD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 152
Default Cycle trailer: good?

Thanks to all for your replies. I will add this data and experience
to the pool of "things to consider" before parting with any money!

Best wishes to all,

PhilD

--

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help: Cycle trailer Gordon Taylor UK 6 July 31st 05 04:48 PM
Cycle trailer Ride-A-Lot Mountain Biking 28 March 14th 05 09:26 PM
Cycle Trailer elyob UK 37 March 10th 05 07:08 PM
cycle rack for 20" trailer bike Gordon Taylor UK 2 January 14th 05 04:16 PM
Wtd: second hand Cycle Trailer Richard Blair UK 5 November 29th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.