|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What every local councillor, or prospective local councillor, should be asked
Southwark Cyclists and Soutwark Living Streets have put together the
following questionaire to go out to all councillors, and prospective councillors, in the borough - about 240. ==================== As a Southwark Councillor, I would commit to: 1. A less car-dominated Southwark, where the need to travel is diminished by, for example, encouraging local facilities and the use of new technologies, without threatening economic well-being. 2. Making Southwark ever better for those who walk and cycle, by implementing urban design that prioritise walking and cycling, including adequate pedestrian crossings in shopping areas and cycle contraflows and protected lanes, even at the expense of on-street parking. 3. Creating, with Transport for London, attractive, flourishing, safe and beautiful streets and green spaces that respect local history, where walking and cycling take priority. 4. Ensuring that all public bodies and private organisations prioritise walking and cycling, and the use of public transport. 5. Using the Council’s planning powers to ensure that all new developments provide for walking and cycling, including secure cycle parking for residents, visitors and at least 30% of employees. 6. Promotion of car clubs, thus reducing car and van use and the financial burden of vehicle ownership. 7. Making the areas around schools safe for walking and cycling and providing training to all Southwark school children, teachers and other staff. 8. Working with the Police to reduce death and injury on our roads by well-enforced 20mph limits on all Southwark roads, including Transport for London's roads; and removing roadside railings and fixtures that hinder pedestrian movement and speed up motor traffic. 9. A zero-casualty policy, with a review of every single road death and serious injury to remove the cause. All Council and contractors’ lorries to be fitted with side-guards, proximity sensors, in-vehicle speed restrictors and full coverage mirrors. 10. Easy access to walking and cycling advice, help and training for all Southwark residents, workers, students and organisations. What I have done and will do to promote walking and cycling (no more than 100 words): Southwark Living Streets and Southwark Cyclists, April 2010 ==================== And the covering note ==================== April 2010 From Southwark Cyclists and Southwark Living Streets Dear Candidate for election as a Southwark Councillor, We are committed to the promotion of sustainable forms of transport. We are writing to you and other candidates to FIND OUT your views on this. PLEASE REPLY: “Yes”, “No”, or “No comment” TO EACH OF THE TEN ITEMS in the attached questionnaire AND TELL US ABOUT YOUR OWN IDEAS IN A SHORT STATEMENT AT THE END. We intend to publish the replies which we will have received by April 22 on a website Southwarksurvey.org.uk and to summarise the responses by a press release. We have been given your name by your party on an email list of addresses. We will not use this list for any other purpose. We are also ensuring that no unpublished information is seen by anyone directly involved in the election campaign. As charities we will, of course, abide by the Guidance from the Charity Commission in relation to elections. We look forward to receiving your response. Yours sincerely Alastair Hanton, Chair, Southwark Living Streets Barry Mason, Coordinator, Southwark Cyclists ==================== |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What every local councillor, or prospective local councillor,should be asked
On 30 Mar, 07:40, Tom Crispin
wrote: Southwark Cyclists and Soutwark Living Streets have put together the following questionaire to go out to all councillors, and prospective councillors, in the borough - about 240. ==================== As a Southwark Councillor, I would commit to: 1. A less car-dominated Southwark, where the need to travel is diminished by, for example, encouraging local facilities and the use of new technologies, without threatening economic well-being. The car dominates because people want them. You should listen to the people as they are the ones who (might) vote for you! 2. Making Southwark ever better for those who walk and cycle, by implementing urban design that prioritise walking and cycling, including adequate pedestrian crossings in shopping areas and cycle contraflows and protected lanes, even at the expense of on-street parking. This is a bad idea, The locals will spend their money locally anyway, but it is the visitors who are really good for business as you can only extract so much money from a giiven catchment. The use of the car widens the catchment area. They should not be discouraged just because they have travelled in their cars. 3. Creating, with Transport for London, attractive, flourishing, safe and beautiful streets and green spaces that respect local history, where walking and cycling take priority. Cycling should not take priority over walking, but to allow cycists into pedestrian areas discourages walkers. Most cycists don't know how to behave around walkers unfortunately 4. Ensuring that all public bodies and private organisations prioritise walking and cycling, and the use of public transport. Why ? 5. Using the Council’s planning powers to ensure that all new developments provide for walking and cycling, including secure cycle parking for residents, visitors and at least 30% of employees. Bad idea, when the residents of these new builds with reduced parking facilities have nowhere to park on their own property, they then fill the spaces in the surrounding streets increasing the burden on existing residential parking. 6. Promotion of car clubs, thus reducing car and van use and the financial burden of vehicle ownership. This is ridiculous. Someone has to own the car so the cost burden still falls to them, and you cannot give lifts for hire or reward as it invalidates the insurance - stupid ,stupid , stupid !!! 7. Making the areas around schools safe for walking and cycling and providing training to all Southwark school children, teachers and other staff. The safests way to do this is to use intensive policing measures to keep the cycists off the pavements in these areas. People with small children don't feel safe sharing their pavements with cyclists. The roads are a quantifiable space and provide a correct and proper place for wheeled transport to move without endangering pedestrians 8. Working with the Police to reduce death and injury on our roads by well-enforced 20mph limits on all Southwark roads, including Transport for London's roads; and removing roadside railings and fixtures that hinder pedestrian movement and speed up motor traffic. This will never fly. To do this on major roads will substantiallty increase congestion at quieter times as it will limit the carrying capacity of the roads at lower traffic densities. 9. A zero-casualty policy, with a review of every single road death and serious injury to remove the cause. All Council and contractors’ lorries to be fitted with side-guards, proximity sensors, in-vehicle speed restrictors and full coverage mirrors. This should be followed up with comprehensive signage on the lorries and on the roads telling cyclists to stay well clear of these vehicles at junctions. 10. Easy access to walking and cycling advice, help and training for all Southwark residents, workers, students and organisations. Training is the key, all cyclists should be trained to use the roads safely so they don't feel any need or desire to use the pavements or run red lights. What I have done and will do to promote walking and cycling (no more than 100 words): Southwark Living Streets and Southwark Cyclists, April 2010 ==================== And the covering note ==================== April 2010 From Southwark Cyclists and Southwark Living Streets Dear Candidate for election as a Southwark Councillor, We are committed to the promotion of sustainable forms of transport. We are writing to you and other candidates to FIND OUT your views on this. PLEASE REPLY: “Yes”, “No”, or “No comment” TO EACH OF THE TEN ITEMS in the attached questionnaire AND TELL US ABOUT YOUR OWN IDEAS IN A SHORT STATEMENT AT THE END. We intend to publish the replies which we will have received by April 22 on a website Southwarksurvey.org.uk and to summarise the responses by a press release. We have been given your name by your party on an email list of addresses. We will not use this list for any other purpose. We are also ensuring that no unpublished information is seen by anyone directly involved in the election campaign. As charities we will, of course, abide by the Guidance from the Charity Commission in relation to elections. We look forward to receiving your response. Yours sincerely Alastair Hanton, Chair, Southwark Living Streets Barry Mason, Coordinator, Southwark Cyclists ==================== Corrected ! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What every local councillor, or prospective local councillor, should be asked
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:40:41 +0100, Tom Crispin
wrote: Southwark Cyclists and Soutwark Living Streets have put together the following questionaire to go out to all councillors, and prospective councillors, in the borough - about 240. ==================== As a Southwark Councillor, I would commit political suicide by signing up to this oppressive scheme. 1. A less car-dominated Southwark, where the need to travel is diminished by, for example, encouraging local facilities Local facilities for what? and the use of new technologies, Which "new technologies"? without threatening economic well-being. Good wholly meaningless waffle, anyone can commit to that as it means nothing. 2. Making Southwark ever better for those who walk and cycle, I'm puzzled by this irrelevant grouping of bicycles and pedestrians as if they are a homogenous group. In fact the biggest deterrent to walking is often cyclists who treat pedestrians with contempt and simply as mobile obstacles. You can have an area which is attractive to pedestrians or one which is attractive to bicyclists, but you can't have one that they share which is attractive to both. Bicycles and pedestrians don't mix. 3. Creating, with Transport for London, attractive, flourishing, safe and beautiful streets and green spaces that respect local history, where walking and cycling take priority. Roads were never built, at any stage in history, for bicycles. Why should the tiny minority of bicyclist suddenly be given priority over pedestrians? What is so special about this mechanical contrivance that it should have priority over everything else? How do you propose goods should be delivered to these "beautiful streets" (Southwark - beautiful?) or tradesmen should carry out work within them? 4. Ensuring that all public bodies and private organisations prioritise walking and cycling, and the use of public transport. Ah, good socialist stuff. Control the means of movement. 5. Using the Council’s planning powers to ensure that all new developments provide for walking and cycling, including secure cycle parking for residents, visitors and at least 30% of employees. So a company employing a workforce most of whom are disabled or elderly would be forced to build cycle parking which would never be used? A residential development for retired people must have bicycle racks for more people than can even walk? 6. Promotion of car clubs, thus reducing car and van use and the financial burden of vehicle ownership. What use is a car club (whatever that is) when you have abolished parking in item 2? 7. Making the areas around schools safe for walking and cycling and providing training to all Southwark school children, teachers and other staff. Thought we would find an advert for your services somewhere. However as a step towards compulsory training, testing and licensing of all bicyclists (in the same way as all motorcyclists) this has potential, I'm pleased to see you coming around to seeing the need for such a scheme. 8. Working with the Police to reduce death and injury on our roads by well-enforced 20mph limits on all Southwark roads, including Transport for London's roads; and removing roadside railings and fixtures that hinder pedestrian movement and speed up motor traffic. I presume you have evidence this would be expected to achieve something? 9. A zero-casualty policy, with a review of every single road death and serious injury to remove the cause. Why only serious injuries? Cyclist are responsible for hundreds of minor injuries to pedestrians and the behaviour of some riding at speed in pedestrian areas has frightened elderly and people with disabilities away from them. Shouldn't this also be addressed? All Council and contractors’ lorries to be fitted with side-guards, proximity sensors, in-vehicle speed restrictors and full coverage mirrors. Why not start with big signs on them telling bicyclists to keep clear and explicitly prohibiting bicyclists from ever overtaking them on their left? That would immediately reduce the accident rate at very little cost. 10. Easy access to walking and cycling advice, help and training for all Southwark residents, workers, students and organisations. A "walking advice worker"? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What every local councillor, or prospective local councillor,should be asked
ashley filmer wrote:
The safests way to do this is to use intensive policing measures to keep the cycists off the pavements in these areas. People with small children don't feel safe sharing their pavements with cyclists. I don't feel safe sharing the road with small children! -- www.slowbicyclemovement.org - enjoy the ride |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What every local councillor, or prospective local councillor,should be asked
On 30 Mar, 19:15, Phil W Lee phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk wrote:
ashley filmer considered Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:01:33 -0700 (PDT) the perfect time to write: some rabid pro petrol head agenda Don't have much concept of the real costs of motoring, do you? Please feel free to fill in the gaps ! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What every local councillor, or prospective local councillor,should be asked
On Mar 30, 7:40*am, Tom Crispin
wrote: Southwark Cyclists and Soutwark Living Streets have put together the following questionaire to go out to all councillors, and prospective councillors, in the borough - about 240. ==================== As a Southwark Councillor, I would commit to: 1. A less car-dominated Southwark, where the need to travel is diminished by, for example, encouraging local facilities and the use of new technologies, without threatening economic well-being. 2. Making Southwark ever better for those who walk and cycle, by implementing urban design that prioritise walking and cycling, including adequate pedestrian crossings in shopping areas and cycle contraflows and protected lanes, even at the expense of on-street parking. 3. Creating, with Transport for London, attractive, flourishing, safe and beautiful streets and green spaces that respect local history, where walking and cycling take priority. 4. Ensuring that all public bodies and private organisations prioritise walking and cycling, and the use of public transport. 5. Using the Council’s planning powers to ensure that all new developments provide for walking and cycling, including secure cycle parking for residents, visitors and at least 30% of employees. 6. Promotion of car clubs, thus reducing car and van use and the financial burden of vehicle ownership. 7. Making the areas around schools safe for walking and cycling and providing training to all Southwark school children, teachers and other staff. 8. Working with the Police to reduce death and injury on our roads by well-enforced 20mph limits on all Southwark roads, including Transport for London's roads; and removing roadside railings and fixtures that hinder pedestrian movement and speed up motor traffic. 9. A zero-casualty policy, with a review of every single road death and serious injury to remove the cause. All Council and contractors’ lorries to be fitted with side-guards, proximity sensors, in-vehicle speed restrictors and full coverage mirrors. 10. Easy access to walking and cycling advice, help and training for all Southwark residents, workers, students and organisations. What I have done and will do to promote walking and cycling (no more than 100 words): Southwark Living Streets and Southwark Cyclists, April 2010 ==================== And the covering note ==================== April 2010 From Southwark Cyclists and Southwark Living Streets Dear Candidate for election as a Southwark Councillor, We are committed to the promotion of sustainable forms of transport. We are writing to you and other candidates to FIND OUT your views on this. PLEASE REPLY: “Yes”, “No”, or “No comment” TO EACH OF THE TEN ITEMS in the attached questionnaire AND TELL US ABOUT YOUR OWN IDEAS IN A SHORT STATEMENT AT THE END. We intend to publish the replies which we will have received by April 22 on a website Southwarksurvey.org.uk and to summarise the responses by a press release. We have been given your name by your party on an email list of addresses. We will not use this list for any other purpose. We are also ensuring that no unpublished information is seen by anyone directly involved in the election campaign. As charities we will, of course, abide by the Guidance from the Charity Commission in relation to elections. We look forward to receiving your response. Yours sincerely Alastair Hanton, Chair, Southwark Living Streets Barry Mason, Coordinator, Southwark Cyclists ==================== What, no questions about kinetic energy? Marie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What every local councillor, or prospective local councillor, should be asked
Tom Crispin wrote:
Southwark Cyclists and Soutwark Living Streets have put together the following questionaire to go out to all councillors, and prospective councillors, in the borough - about 240. SNIP BOLLOX That is absolutely disgusting. A selfish pressure group attempting to blackmail people into bowing to their insane demands. Have you ****wits considered the cost and who will be footing the bill? Of course not, cyclists are sponging freeloaders who expect someone else to pay. Have you considered the effect on local tradesmen & shop owners? Of course not. Have you considered what the majority want? Of course not. You should be ****ing well ashamed of yourselves. You are lower than pond scum. -- Dave - the small piece of 14th century armour used to protect the armpit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
POL: local libertarians are upset that a local bike path has a speedlimit | landotter | Techniques | 12 | September 1st 09 03:41 AM |
Toronto councillor: dead cyclists have themselves to blame! | [email protected] | Australia | 3 | March 10th 07 12:49 PM |
Clueless councillor | The Luggage | UK | 1 | August 16th 05 12:42 PM |
Local Shops | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | February 9th 05 05:35 PM |
got my pic taken in the local paper | Marc70 | Unicycling | 13 | September 21st 03 11:51 PM |