|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
I used Prolink on my beater chain about 5 months ago. I've ridden it on
short 1/2 mile trips on a daily basis, with a couple of wet rides. I haven't maintained it at all because my current job has distracts me from my interest in bikes, and the entire set of inner and outer plates is a nasty dry-rust mess at this point. However, there's no chain squeak. This is a SS with decently high tension on the chain. I also don't notice any dry chain roller "rattle." Is there no squeak because of the chain tension, or is it because the Prolink has actually maintained its lubricating properties? -- Phil |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
Phil, Non-Squid wrote:
I used Prolink on my beater chain about 5 months ago. I've ridden it on short 1/2 mile trips on a daily basis, with a couple of wet rides. I haven't maintained it at all because my current job has distracts me from my interest in bikes, and the entire set of inner and outer plates is a nasty dry-rust mess at this point. However, there's no chain squeak. This is a SS with decently high tension on the chain. I also don't notice any dry chain roller "rattle." Is there no squeak because of the chain tension, or is it because the Prolink has actually maintained its lubricating properties? who knows? for me, prolink lasts about a week, and yes, rust seems to be a real issue. 15% chain saw oil in white spirit otoh lasts about 2 weeks. and no rust problems. but i'm reluctant to ascribe magical properties to something where i don't know for sure what's going on. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
In article om,
"Phil, Non-Squid" wrote: I used Prolink on my beater chain about 5 months ago. I've ridden it on short 1/2 mile trips on a daily basis, with a couple of wet rides. I haven't maintained it at all because my current job has distracts me from my interest in bikes, and the entire set of inner and outer plates is a nasty dry-rust mess at this point. However, there's no chain squeak. This is a SS with decently high tension on the chain. I also don't notice any dry chain roller "rattle." Is there no squeak because of the chain tension, or is it because the Prolink has actually maintained its lubricating properties? http://www.progoldmfr.com/products/prolink.html Prolink claims to be a "metal conditioner" using "MFR technology." Whatever the hell that is. http://www.progoldmfr.com/products/MFRconc.html "Not to be confused with ordinary "additives," ProGold MFR Concentrate is a scientifically blended petroleum-based formula designed to blend with motor oils, gear oils and other lubricants, either natural hydrocarbon or synthetic. It coats internal metal surfaces with a polarized layer of oil molecules to resist extreme pressure and excessive temperature in industrial and automotive applications such as internal combustion and diesel engines, automatic and manual transmissions, differentials, gear boxes, mining and smelting equipment, machine tools, air compressors, pumps, generators, bearings and bearing journals. Contains no plastic particles, PTFE resins, molybdenum disulfide, or any other solids which may cause harmful buildup." They don't identify what "MFR" is. Searching the Web for "MFR" and things like "lubricant" and "tribology" was not all that helpful. Nothing turned up at www.uspto.com but then since I don't know what "MFR technology" stands for that might be a limiter. One definition of "MFR" was "Melt Flow Rate." Another was "Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin:" http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/TSF06/Event/55993 http://www.chamotlabs.com/Applicatio...thMidwest.html Note that ProLink is part of the "ProGold" family of products, which have those wonderful commercials where they add their product to the oil in an engine, then drain the oil out of the engine and leave it running while all the other engines using plain motor oil rapidly overheat and seize. http://www.progoldmfr.com/products/enginetrmt.html It looks suspiciously like oleus serpentus to me. However, that said, I've got a bottle of ProLink and it works fine on my chains. I get 300-400 miles between applications. The chain seems to be slightly less of a dust and dirt magnet than is the case motor oil and it seems to dry a bit more. It seems to hold up in the rain fairly well but no better than motor oil. Most of the breathless claims on the ProLink page of ProGold's Web site are hooey, though. It's not a dry lube, it does attract dirt to an extent, I've seen no sign of it cleaning as I ride, etc. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:30:38 -0600, Tim McNamara
wrote: [snip] They don't identify what "MFR" is. Searching the Web for "MFR" and things like "lubricant" and "tribology" was not all that helpful. Nothing turned up at www.uspto.com but then since I don't know what "MFR technology" stands for that might be a limiter. One definition of "MFR" was "Melt Flow Rate." Another was "Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin:" [snip] Dear Tim, "MFR technology" is just a silly marketing acronym for "metal friction reducer technology": http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l... n+reducer%22 Cheers, Carl Fogel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
jim beam wrote: Phil, Non-Squid wrote: I used Prolink on my beater chain about 5 months ago. I've ridden it on short 1/2 mile trips on a daily basis, with a couple of wet rides. I haven't maintained it at all because my current job has distracts me from my interest in bikes, and the entire set of inner and outer plates is a nasty dry-rust mess at this point. However, there's no chain squeak. This is a SS with decently high tension on the chain. I also don't notice any dry chain roller "rattle." Is there no squeak because of the chain tension, or is it because the Prolink has actually maintained its lubricating properties? who knows? for me, prolink lasts about a week, and yes, rust seems to be a real issue. 15% chain saw oil in white spirit otoh lasts about 2 weeks. and no rust problems. but i'm reluctant to ascribe magical properties to something where i don't know for sure what's going on. I have done double-blind testing and can state unequivocally that Prolink is more magical than chan saw oil and white spirit. I like Prolink. It is less messy than my usual 30 weight and it does hold on pretty well in the rain. I have a bottle of "ATB oil" (it looks like Mystery Oil) that works well, too. The only real POS oil I have used up here is White Lightning, which washes off by the time I get to the end of the driveway on a rainy day. Maybe I got a bottle with the magic drained out of it. -- Jay Beattie. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
Tim McNamara wrote:
http://www.progoldmfr.com/products/enginetrmt.html It looks suspiciously like oleus serpentus to me. However, that said, I've got a bottle of ProLink and it works fine on my chains. I get 300-400 miles between applications. The chain seems to be slightly less of a dust and dirt magnet than is the case motor oil and it seems to dry a bit more. It seems to hold up in the rain fairly well but no better than motor oil. Most of the breathless claims on the ProLink page of ProGold's Web site are hooey, though. It's not a dry lube, it does attract dirt to an extent, I've seen no sign of it cleaning as I ride, etc. After trying a bunch of chain lubricants, I've settled on ProLink as a good compromise - attracts crud less than triflow or similar oils, lasts a whole lot longer than the wax-based lubricants I tried. That said, I agree that the "MFR" blather is overdone. Mark J. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:30:38 -0600, Tim McNamara
wrote: Prolink claims to be a "metal conditioner" using "MFR technology." Whatever the hell that is. It looks suspiciously like oleus serpentus to me. Yeah, it really sounds like long aliphatic chain hydrocarbons derived from organically grown reptilian sources. However, that said, I've got a bottle of ProLink and it works fine on my chains. I get 300-400 miles between applications. The chain seems to be slightly less of a dust and dirt magnet than is the case motor oil and it seems to dry a bit more. It seems to hold up in the rain fairly well but no better than motor oil. While using Prolink, I had to run some real oil over the chain every few weeks to keep it from rusting, which made the spectacular black mess for the next few weeks. Most of the breathless claims on the ProLink page of ProGold's Web site are hooey, though. It's not a dry lube, it does attract dirt to an extent, I've seen no sign of it cleaning as I ride, etc. My preference is to get all the possible maintenance done at once. Am I the only person who comes back from a ride and wants to go get a drink inside an air conditioned house, instead of puttering around lubing a chain, which I then need to spend a few minutes wiping off before the next ride? (Half this gripe applies to store-bought homebrew, aka WL.) Pat Email address works as is. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
In article ,
Patrick Lamb wrote: On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:45:46 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:30:38 -0600, Tim McNamara wrote: They don't identify what "MFR" is. Searching the Web for "MFR" and things like "lubricant" and "tribology" was not all that helpful. Nothing turned up at www.uspto.com but then since I don't know what "MFR technology" stands for that might be a limiter. One definition of "MFR" was "Melt Flow Rate." Another was "Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin:" "MFR technology" is just a silly marketing acronym for "metal friction reducer technology": Would a translation into something resembling English read, "Technical meaning replaced by marketing babble "? I think probably just "marketing babble." I'm not at all sure that there was "technical meaning" in the first place. Oh well, it is a decent product in terms of how it works. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Prolink actually stays, or chain tension doesn't allow squeak?
Tim McNamara wrote:
In article , Patrick Lamb wrote: On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:45:46 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:30:38 -0600, Tim McNamara wrote: They don't identify what "MFR" is. Searching the Web for "MFR" and things like "lubricant" and "tribology" was not all that helpful. Nothing turned up at www.uspto.com but then since I don't know what "MFR technology" stands for that might be a limiter. One definition of "MFR" was "Melt Flow Rate." Another was "Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin:" "MFR technology" is just a silly marketing acronym for "metal friction reducer technology": Would a translation into something resembling English read, "Technical meaning replaced by marketing babble "? I think probably just "marketing babble." I'm not at all sure that there was "technical meaning" in the first place. Oh well, it is a decent product in terms of how it works. I read somewhere that the producers of "Star Trek - Next Generation" wanted to sound good scientifically, so they hired a science/tech guy to doctor their scripts. The scriptwriters literally wrote things like "Captain! The tech-ity tech tech is about to tech" and the science guy would fill in something that sounded good. Maybe prolink does it the other way around - the technical people write stuff like "Markety mark mark makes Prolink very effective" and the marketing people fill in with things like "MFR". Mark J. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
stronger leaf-shape chain stays? | [email protected] | Techniques | 5 | July 6th 06 02:12 AM |
Chain tension too loose. How to fix? | Paul Healy | UK | 2 | June 10th 05 11:50 AM |
Does anyone dislike Prolink chain lube? | yzfrr11 | Techniques | 25 | February 22nd 05 01:22 AM |
chain tension | Mark McNeill | UK | 7 | February 15th 05 12:30 PM |
S-Bend chain stays? | Ted | Techniques | 5 | July 24th 03 11:50 PM |