|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist Krygowski to speak for cyclists?
On Aug 29, 4:32*pm, Frank Krygowski wrote:
Wow. *And I suppose Cheney's meetings with oil executives - before setting Bush's energy policy - were just to share vacation photos? - Frank Krygowski There's your true fascist dictator speaking. This ****** Krygowski wants the industrial policy of the nation to be set without consulting with the relevant industry. That single short paragraph, given in its entirety, is an adequate and sufficient, indeed overwhelming reason why we should not permit Krygowski to speak for cycling, for us, for anybody. Why should Krygowski consult us when he knows better than we do what we need and want? Andre Jute Anti-Helmet Zealotry is like Scientology, only with less science |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?
On 8/29/2010 1:29 PM, André Jute wrote:
[...] crickets -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist Krygowski to speak for cyclists?
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
... On Aug 29, 4:32 pm, Frank Krygowski wrote: Wow. And I suppose Cheney's meetings with oil executives - before setting Bush's energy policy - were just to share vacation photos? - Frank Krygowski There's your true fascist dictator speaking. This ****** Krygowski wants the industrial policy of the nation to be set without consulting with the relevant industry. That single short paragraph, given in its entirety, is an adequate and sufficient, indeed overwhelming reason why we should not permit Krygowski to speak for cycling, for us, for anybody. Why should Krygowski consult us when he knows better than we do what we need and want? Like a lot of things these days, because the elites say so. Bill "pass the salt (better hurry)" S. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?
In article ,
Tom Sherman °_° wrote: On 8/29/2010 1:29 PM, André Jute wrote: [...] crickets A word to the wise. Do not put text it quotation marks that the quoted person did not write. -- Michael Press |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?
On 8/29/2010 2:42 PM, Michael Press wrote:
In , Tom Sherman wrote: On 8/29/2010 1:29 PM, André Jute wrote: [...] crickets A word to the wise. Do not put text i[n] quotation marks that the quoted person did not write. Michael Press is surprisingly unaware of the standard convention of brackets indicating and editorial insertion or deletion. Therefore, there is nothing dishonest or misleading in what I did. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?
Under the headline "Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?"
Tom Sherman °_° wrote: On 8/29/2010 1:29 PM, André Jute wrote: [...] crickets The little scumball Tom Sherman is trying to shut me up altogether: "Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?" Not that it matters to braindead name-callers like Liddell Tommi, but I can prove Krygowski has fascist tendencies, while Liddell Tommi can prove no fascist tendencies about me at all. In fact, Liddell Tommi knows so little about fascism, he thought Mussolini was the Fuhrer of the Third Reich, until I straightened him out. That favour is the source of Liddell Tommi's present resentment. (Never do a petty jerkoff a favour -- he won't thank you for it.) I merely want to stop the fascist Krygowski pretending to speak for all cyclists: "Who wants the fascist Krygowski to speak for cyclists?" My headline makes clear that I'm not prescribing for anyone else; those who want Krygowski are free to choose him. They'll only get to choose once, but that's the way it works with the Thousand Year Reichs of fascists and commos and mullahs, all of them antidemocratic totalitarians. What Liddell Tommi is is too nasty to describe in a family conference. Andre Jute A real liberal, not a closet control freak |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist Krygowski to speak for cyclists?
Bill Sornson wrote:
Like a lot of things these days, because the elites say so. To break down the jargon a bit for anyone who would like to follow what Bill is saying: By "elites", Bill means "people who disagree with me, but coincidentally are much smarter than me and everybody else who shares my opinions". And by "things", Bill means "things Fox News told me". Chalo |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?
On Aug 29, 8:51*pm, Tom Sherman °_°
wrote: On 8/29/2010 2:42 PM, Michael Press wrote: In , * Tom Sherman *wrote: On 8/29/2010 1:29 PM, André Jute wrote: [...] crickets A word to the wise. Do not put text i[n] quotation marks that the quoted person did not write. Michael Press is surprisingly unaware of the standard convention of brackets indicating and editorial insertion or deletion. *Therefore, there is nothing dishonest or misleading in what I did. You're an ignorant clown, Liddell Tommi. Here is the standard convention among educated and civilized writers and other workers in publishing: Angle brackets, like this are the same as quotation marks, just as Michael says. Half-round brackets like this ( ) are used for thoughts in parenthesis by the author himself. Square brackets like this [ ] are used for matter inserted by an editor, normally understood to be explicatory. What you're doing, Liddell Tommi, is to lie, in quotes, about what I wrote. You're a cheat and a liar, Tom Sherman, and now you're lying about your first lie. Andre Jute Where shall we hold the Global Warming Trials? Nuremberg sounds good. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?
On 8/29/2010 3:19 PM, André Jute wrote:
On Aug 29, 8:51 pm, Tom Sherman °_° wrote: On 8/29/2010 2:42 PM, Michael Press wrote: In , Tom Sherman wrote: On 8/29/2010 1:29 PM, André Jute wrote: [...] crickets A word to the wise. Do not put text i[n] quotation marks that the quoted person did not write. Michael Press is surprisingly unaware of the standard convention of brackets indicating and editorial insertion or deletion. Therefore, there is nothing dishonest or misleading in what I did. You're an ignorant clown, Liddell Tommi. Here is the standard convention among educated and civilized writers and other workers in publishing: Angle brackets, like this are the same as quotation marks, just as Michael says. Half-round brackets like this ( ) are used for thoughts in parenthesis by the author himself. Square brackets like this [ ] are used for matter inserted by an editor, normally understood to be explicatory. What you're doing, Liddell Tommi, is to lie, in quotes, about what I wrote. You're a cheat and a liar, Tom Sherman, and now you're lying about your first lie. Oh nonsense. First of all, where I wrote "crickets was not proceeded by a "", indicating it was new text by me, and not quoted text as any but the newest n00b to Usenet knows. Secondly, on Usenet, putting something in angle brackets indicates it is either a URL or a representation of a non-written effect (as was the case here). However, I do enjoy Mr. Jute making himself look silly. -- , Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?
On 8/29/2010 3:14 PM, André Jute wrote:
Under the headline "Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?" Tom Sherman wrote: On 8/29/2010 1:29 PM, André Jute wrote: [...] crickets The little scumball Tom Sherman is trying to shut me up altogether: "Who wants the fascist André Jute to speak at all?" Not that it matters to braindead name-callers like Liddell Tommi, but I can prove Krygowski has fascist tendencies, while Liddell Tommi can prove no fascist tendencies about me at all. In fact, Liddell Tommi knows so little about fascism, he thought Mussolini was the Fuhrer of the Third Reich, until I straightened him out. That favour is the source of Liddell Tommi's present resentment. (Never do a petty jerkoff a favour -- he won't thank you for it.) Mr. Jute continues to lie on this matter. I merely want to stop the fascist Krygowski pretending to speak for all cyclists: "Who wants the fascist Krygowski to speak for cyclists?" My headline makes clear that I'm not prescribing for anyone else; those who want Krygowski are free to choose him. They'll only get to choose once, but that's the way it works with the Thousand Year Reichs of fascists and commos and mullahs, all of them antidemocratic totalitarians. What Liddell Tommi is is too nasty to describe in a family conference. Andre Jute A real liberal, not a closet control freak Oh pish posh. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who wants the fascist Krygowski to speak for cyclists? | Andre Jute[_2_] | Racing | 44 | September 1st 10 05:57 PM |
Frank "Temperance" Krygowski declares open season for motoristson cyclists who take a drink | Kevan Smith[_2_] | Rides | 1 | August 24th 10 11:38 PM |
Olympic riders speak out on UK driver aggression towards cyclists. | [email protected] | UK | 23 | March 10th 06 01:36 PM |