|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Zoom adjustable quill stems
I've looking for taller stems with a reach shorter than the current
quill S/R on my ancient road bike, but I'm not exactly sure what the right measurements should be. An adjustable one like this: http://harriscyclery.net/site/page.c...=49&SKU=SM2874 appears to foot the bill. Before opening the wallet, and going through handlebar extraction hell with my existing set-up, I'm curious as to whether anyone has used one of these on a road bike. I'll be using it for commuting (24 mi round trip, mostly bike paths + streets of variable roughness), errands etc. around the neighborhood, and occasional longer rides. How does it hold up? Are the adjustments as simple as they appear to be? Is it overly flex-y? Are there any alternatives worth looking at? Any other issues? TIA, John |
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I just took an adjustable (though not a quill) stem off of my new bike.
It is amazingly heavy. (I'll weigh it tomorrow, if you like. It seems to be around a third of a pound heavier than the standard replacement.) Before I purchased this bike, I had never really thought about the effect of a very heavy stem on a bike. On my racing bike, adding a cm or two to a normal stem never affected the ride very much. Removing the adjustable stem on this new bike has made a big and positive difference - converting an unsteady and somewhat wobbly bike into a normal handling road bike. I would get fitted or ride until you get a good guess about the proper size. Then, go with a "normal" stem. vB JBAfromNY wrote: I've looking for taller stems with a reach shorter than the current quill S/R on my ancient road bike, but I'm not exactly sure what the right measurements should be. An adjustable one like this: http://harriscyclery.net/site/page.c...=49&SKU=SM2874 appears to foot the bill. Before opening the wallet, and going through handlebar extraction hell with my existing set-up, I'm curious as to whether anyone has used one of these on a road bike. I'll be using it for commuting (24 mi round trip, mostly bike paths + streets of variable roughness), errands etc. around the neighborhood, and occasional longer rides. How does it hold up? Are the adjustments as simple as they appear to be? Is it overly flex-y? Are there any alternatives worth looking at? Any other issues? TIA, John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I just took an adjustable (though not a quill) stem off of my new bike.
It is amazingly heavy. (I'll weigh it tomorrow, if you like. It seems to be around a third of a pound heavier than the standard replacement.) Before I purchased this bike, I had never really thought about the effect of a very heavy stem on a bike. On my racing bike, adding a cm or two to a normal stem never affected the ride very much. Removing the adjustable stem on this new bike has made a big and positive difference - converting an unsteady and somewhat wobbly bike into a normal handling road bike. I would get fitted or ride until you get a good guess about the proper size. Then, go with a "normal" stem. vB JBAfromNY wrote: I've looking for taller stems with a reach shorter than the current quill S/R on my ancient road bike, but I'm not exactly sure what the right measurements should be. An adjustable one like this: http://harriscyclery.net/site/page.c...=49&SKU=SM2874 appears to foot the bill. Before opening the wallet, and going through handlebar extraction hell with my existing set-up, I'm curious as to whether anyone has used one of these on a road bike. I'll be using it for commuting (24 mi round trip, mostly bike paths + streets of variable roughness), errands etc. around the neighborhood, and occasional longer rides. How does it hold up? Are the adjustments as simple as they appear to be? Is it overly flex-y? Are there any alternatives worth looking at? Any other issues? TIA, John |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 25 Aug 2004 11:43:46 -0700, (JBAfromNY) wrote:
I've looking for taller stems with a reach shorter than the current quill S/R on my ancient road bike, but I'm not exactly sure what the right measurements should be. An adjustable one like this: http://harriscyclery.net/site/page.c...=49&SKU=SM2874 appears to foot the bill. Before opening the wallet, and going through handlebar extraction hell with my existing set-up, I'm curious as to whether anyone has used one of these on a road bike. I'll be using it for commuting (24 mi round trip, mostly bike paths + streets of variable roughness), errands etc. around the neighborhood, and occasional longer rides. How does it hold up? Are the adjustments as simple as they appear to be? Is it overly flex-y? Are there any alternatives worth looking at? Any other issues? Turns out I own two of these, one of which I actually use. It came on a Fuji Touring Series I bought used. I don't know if it was original equipment or something the previous owner added. I adjusted it to fit me when I got the bike (almost two years ago) and haven't touched it since. Adjustment was simple and it's held the adjustment just fine. Alternatives; the Look Ergo Stem is more adjustable, but costs four or five times as much. BTW, my second Zoom adjustable stem was on a Trek 520 a friend of mine wanted to sell. She thought it would sell better if she returned it to factory specs, so she had me reinstall the original stem. In payment she gave me the Zoom (and some other parts I retrograded). I've thought about using it on my TT bike, but then I haven't ridden that bike in a few years. :-( Another BTW, I liked the 520 so much I recommended my girlfriend buy it. She's been happily riding it for about three years now. jeverett3ATearthlinkDOTnet http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On 25 Aug 2004 11:43:46 -0700, (JBAfromNY) wrote:
I've looking for taller stems with a reach shorter than the current quill S/R on my ancient road bike, but I'm not exactly sure what the right measurements should be. An adjustable one like this: http://harriscyclery.net/site/page.c...=49&SKU=SM2874 appears to foot the bill. Before opening the wallet, and going through handlebar extraction hell with my existing set-up, I'm curious as to whether anyone has used one of these on a road bike. I'll be using it for commuting (24 mi round trip, mostly bike paths + streets of variable roughness), errands etc. around the neighborhood, and occasional longer rides. How does it hold up? Are the adjustments as simple as they appear to be? Is it overly flex-y? Are there any alternatives worth looking at? Any other issues? Turns out I own two of these, one of which I actually use. It came on a Fuji Touring Series I bought used. I don't know if it was original equipment or something the previous owner added. I adjusted it to fit me when I got the bike (almost two years ago) and haven't touched it since. Adjustment was simple and it's held the adjustment just fine. Alternatives; the Look Ergo Stem is more adjustable, but costs four or five times as much. BTW, my second Zoom adjustable stem was on a Trek 520 a friend of mine wanted to sell. She thought it would sell better if she returned it to factory specs, so she had me reinstall the original stem. In payment she gave me the Zoom (and some other parts I retrograded). I've thought about using it on my TT bike, but then I haven't ridden that bike in a few years. :-( Another BTW, I liked the 520 so much I recommended my girlfriend buy it. She's been happily riding it for about three years now. jeverett3ATearthlinkDOTnet http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Varanasi Benares wrote in message thlink.net...
I just took an adjustable (though not a quill) stem off of my new bike. It is amazingly heavy. (I'll weigh it tomorrow, if you like. It seems to be around a third of a pound heavier than the standard replacement.) Before I purchased this bike, I had never really thought about the effect of a very heavy stem on a bike. On my racing bike, adding a cm or two to a normal stem never affected the ride very much. Removing the adjustable stem on this new bike has made a big and positive difference - converting an unsteady and somewhat wobbly bike into a normal handling road bike. I would get fitted or ride until you get a good guess about the proper size. Then, go with a "normal" stem. vB Getting properly fit is probably good advice, but I'm not too confident in any of the shops near me to do this. In any event, I I wound up buying the thing from a LBS before seeing your post. I was itching to install some cross-brakes and re-tape my bars anyway, so with this much dis-assembly going on anyway, two birds with one stone and all that. I'm not too concerned about the weight issue. Though I haven't weighed the Zoom versus my current stem, I don't think there's going to be much of a penalty, if any. The horizontal part of the stem is alloy , and overall it seems pretty light. I think what I have right now (an old S/R cromo quill) is relatively heavy to begin with. Also, the main reason for this purchase (my gradual evolution into something older, slower, heavier, and less flexible than what I was when I bought the bike) probably lessens the significance of stem weight. Many additional pounds of torso leaning on the same old hands probably means more than a few dozen grams of stem in the grand scheme of things. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Varanasi Benares wrote in message thlink.net...
I just took an adjustable (though not a quill) stem off of my new bike. It is amazingly heavy. (I'll weigh it tomorrow, if you like. It seems to be around a third of a pound heavier than the standard replacement.) Before I purchased this bike, I had never really thought about the effect of a very heavy stem on a bike. On my racing bike, adding a cm or two to a normal stem never affected the ride very much. Removing the adjustable stem on this new bike has made a big and positive difference - converting an unsteady and somewhat wobbly bike into a normal handling road bike. I would get fitted or ride until you get a good guess about the proper size. Then, go with a "normal" stem. vB Getting properly fit is probably good advice, but I'm not too confident in any of the shops near me to do this. In any event, I I wound up buying the thing from a LBS before seeing your post. I was itching to install some cross-brakes and re-tape my bars anyway, so with this much dis-assembly going on anyway, two birds with one stone and all that. I'm not too concerned about the weight issue. Though I haven't weighed the Zoom versus my current stem, I don't think there's going to be much of a penalty, if any. The horizontal part of the stem is alloy , and overall it seems pretty light. I think what I have right now (an old S/R cromo quill) is relatively heavy to begin with. Also, the main reason for this purchase (my gradual evolution into something older, slower, heavier, and less flexible than what I was when I bought the bike) probably lessens the significance of stem weight. Many additional pounds of torso leaning on the same old hands probably means more than a few dozen grams of stem in the grand scheme of things. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Varanasi Benares wrote in message ... I just took an adjustable (though not a quill) stem off of my new bike. It is amazingly heavy. (I'll weigh it tomorrow, if you like. It seems to be around a third of a pound heavier than the standard replacement.) Before I purchased this bike, I had never really thought about the effect of a very heavy stem on a bike. On my racing bike, adding a cm or two to a normal stem never affected the ride very much. Removing the adjustable stem on this new bike has made a big and positive difference - converting an unsteady and somewhat wobbly bike into a normal handling road bike. I would get fitted or ride until you get a good guess about the proper size. Then, go with a "normal" stem. A balance of components. Trevor |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Varanasi Benares wrote in message ... I just took an adjustable (though not a quill) stem off of my new bike. It is amazingly heavy. (I'll weigh it tomorrow, if you like. It seems to be around a third of a pound heavier than the standard replacement.) Before I purchased this bike, I had never really thought about the effect of a very heavy stem on a bike. On my racing bike, adding a cm or two to a normal stem never affected the ride very much. Removing the adjustable stem on this new bike has made a big and positive difference - converting an unsteady and somewhat wobbly bike into a normal handling road bike. I would get fitted or ride until you get a good guess about the proper size. Then, go with a "normal" stem. A balance of components. Trevor |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: High End road Quill Stems (Titec/3T) | Pete | Marketplace | 0 | December 8th 04 12:31 AM |
Cinelli 1e and SR quill stems. | Andrew Karre | Marketplace | 0 | November 17th 04 03:07 AM |
looking out for 25.4 quill stems | Garry Broad | UK | 6 | October 15th 03 09:27 PM |