cowardly cyclist attacks woman in car

there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...l/article.html

Mrcheerful wrote:
there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...l/article.html


Ah, appealing for witnesses. We all know what that means ;-)

Tony

Tony Raven wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:
there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...l/article.html


Ah, appealing for witnesses. We all know what that means ;-)

Tony

yes, it means that the police want people to come forward that witnessed the
attack. (not too bright these cyclist types)

Rather different to waiting a few months and the defendant asking fellow
cyclists as in the Oxford Street case.

On 11/11/2010 10:01, Tony Raven wrote:

Mrcheerful wrote:

there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...l/article.html

Ah, appealing for witnesses. We all know what that means ;-)

Indeed we do, when the police do it, as in this case.

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:01:39 +0000, Tony Raven
wrote:

Mrcheerful wrote:
there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...l/article.html


Ah, appealing for witnesses. We all know what that means ;-)

Tony



Good old Raving - as daft as ever.

You may not realise that there is a difference between the police
appealing for witnesses and someone on a cycling blog asking his
mates.


Well done (****wit)


--


"Then back to my club on Pall Mall "

Tony Raven - pretentious tosser

"Mrcheerful" wrote:
Tony Raven wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:
there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...l/article.html


Ah, appealing for witnesses. We all know what that means ;-)

Tony

yes, it means that the police want people to come forward that
witnessed the
attack. (not too bright these cyclist types)


Nah, she's clearly trying to pevert the course of justice according to
some here.

"Although Mrs Powell spoke to a woman in the car behind she was too
shocked to think to take her details, and is appealing for any witnesses
to come forward."

Not one of the drivers in the queue rushed forward to volunteer their
help at the time. I wonder why?

Tony

On Nov 11, 9:52*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...ke-car/article...

No excuse for that behaviour, but technically he did not attack woman
in car, he attacked car with woman standing nearby.
Sorry if that doesn't sound so dramatic.

Tony Raven wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote:
Tony Raven wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:
there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...l/article.html


Ah, appealing for witnesses. We all know what that means ;-)

Tony

yes, it means that the police want people to come forward that
witnessed the
attack. (not too bright these cyclist types)


Nah, she's clearly trying to pevert the course of justice according to
some here.

"Although Mrs Powell spoke to a woman in the car behind she was too
shocked to think to take her details, and is appealing for any
witnesses to come forward."

Not one of the drivers in the queue rushed forward to volunteer their
help at the time. I wonder why?

Tony

frightened of the lunatic cyclist maybe. or more likely the present malaise
of 'it's nothing to do with me, so I'll look the other way'
In the circumstances the driver would have been perfectly ok to mow him down
and hospitalise him (according to some on this NG)

On 11/11/2010 13:41, PhilO wrote:

wrote:

there is no possible excuse for violence like this

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/...ke-car/article...

No excuse for that behaviour, but technically he did not attack woman
in car, he attacked car with woman standing nearby.
Sorry if that doesn't sound so dramatic.

Correct. It's "only" a serious instance of criminal damage rather than an
assault.

It still has to be doubted that he would have dared do it if the vehicle's
nearby owner had been a 6' 3" off-duty squaddie instead of a female.

On 11/11/2010 13:45, JNugent wrote:

It still has to be doubted that he would have dared do it if the
vehicle's nearby owner had been a 6' 3" off-duty squaddie instead of a
female.


In much the same way, motorists rarely shout abuse at 6ft squaddies
riding bikes - it's usually women or older folk they like to target.

SW