|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Women's vs. men's saddles
On Tue, 25 May 2004 08:30:15 -0400, David Kerber
wrote: or the more expensive one. Getting the wider one when you could use the narrow one probably won't be a problem, but if you get the narrow one when you really should have the wide one will get painful after a few miles. A saddle too wide can obstruct your legs as they move back, or can cause you to automatically scoot forward too far. -- Rick Onanian |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Women's vs. men's saddles
nopcbs wrote:
I happen to live in an area where there are no bike shops with a good selection of saddles nearby. What they have is little more than what you'll find at Dunham's. I need a new saddle as the "C9" saddle that I bought at one of the local shops a couple of years ago is wearing out (the lycra is wearing through - I ride almost 20 miles a day in good weather). I don't want another lycra saddle for this reason and I am not crazy about vinyl (no breathability). I think I want leather which no local shop sells at all. Been looking at the Terry Liberators on-line at Performance and Nashbar. Also read reviews at MtbReview. Seem like a good choice. In my on-line shopping I noticed that sometimes Performance or Nashbar will have the woman's version of a saddle on sale for about 1/3 less than the men's version. Far as I can tell, the women's saddles are slightly shorter and slightly wider. Supposedly the width is to accomodate the wider hip-bones of women vs. men. Problem with that is that I'm sure men and women hip-bone widths overlap since there humans have an enormous range of body sizes within each sex. Makes me think that this men's vs. women's saddle thing is more marketing than anything else and I should just buy whatever is cheaper in a given line. (Hell, we neanthertal men are supposed to get in touch with their "feminine side" anyway, right?) What say you all? - nopcbs Yes, even though the distance between the the superior iliac spine (the seat bone) of a female has a greater chance of being wider than the distance between the superior iliac spines of the male of a same overall body size, the truth is that if the guy is small and the woman if large, this could be reversed. Oh well. If you're the manufacturer, go for the average and hope the customer doesn't hate your product. According to William Bass' Human Osteology: a Laboratory and Field Manual, the space between the superior iliac spines has little to do with sex determination. Given the variability in overall body size, it just isn't reliable. I use the reverse logic to make my argument above: |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Women's vs. men's saddles
Rick Onanian wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2004 20:09:01 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: Excellent! I saw a kid the other day whose pants were apparently hanging BELOW his butt. Hard to believe, but that's what it looked like. So I got to wondering -- is it possible that they wear women's garter belts? It would be very practical and certainly unobtrusive as long as they're wearing those extra-long monster t-shirts. I saw one the other day whose t-shirt went down _below_ his knees. It looked like he was wearing a dress. His shorts* barely protruded below the shirt. I laughed out loud. *Speaking of street shorts, have you noticed how long shorts are now? What's the point? It's hard to find shorts that allow air to reach my knees, and I _don't_ wear my belt below my genitals. Anyway, for the ones wearing their belt at their thighs or knees, don't these kids have armed gangs to run from or something? -- Rick Onanian See, that's the funny thing. Here is Chicago the serious gang-bangers aren't dressed as ostentatiously. The middle-class white boys are, though. Hey, survival breeds innovation and practicality! -Collin |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Women's vs. men's saddles
Yes, even though the distance between the the superior iliac spine
(the seat bone) of a female has a greater chance of being wider than the distance between the superior iliac spines of the male... No doubt. But what you really want to measure is the distance between the ischial tuberosities, not the iliac spines. -- _______________________ALL AMIGA IN MY MIND_______________________ ------------------"Buddy Holly, the Texas Elvis"------------------ in.edu__________ |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Women's vs. men's saddles
Yes, even though the distance between the the superior iliac spine (the seat bone) of a female has a greater chance of being wider than the distance between the superior iliac spines of the male... No doubt. But what you really want to measure is the distance between the ischial tuberosities, not the iliac spines. Yes, and that is relatively easy and we do it all the time. Pat in TX |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Serfas RX saddles | DRS | General | 11 | April 27th 04 07:10 PM |
Can someone compare Selle Italia flite and prolink gelflow saddles? | Wesley Dunnington | General | 1 | July 24th 03 03:29 AM |