|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On May 9, 7:59*pm, thirty-six wrote:
I've been biting my tongue so much my chilli sauce is made from tomatoes. *There is probably a third of my submissions do not get 'approved' for posting. And yet you are the single most prolific poster to that group, according to the stats. Which means you are posting an *awful* lot of material, over twice as much as the next most prolific poster. Have you not considered a bit of self-criticism here? Maybe in all that storm of postings you *are* being repetitive (I would not know, I killfiled you - for being repetitive). *This is a long standing issue relating to quantifiable PROOF on the relationship of techniques involved in wheelbuilding. *Do a search on the URCM indecent activity list when you are feeling bored. Yup, you have a bee in your bonnet and you are absolutely determined that everybody *must* accept your mathematically unsupportable assertions and not the finite element analysis carried out by a competent scientist. That is, I think you'll find, your problem not anyone else's. If you have a hot button topic (which many of us do) you have to learn that not everyone wants to hear about it, certainly not all the time, and accept the criticism that it will inevitably draw. It is not a conspiracy. -- Guy |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On 23 May, 12:40, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On May 9, 7:59*pm, thirty-six wrote: I've been biting my tongue so much my chilli sauce is made from tomatoes. *There is probably a third of my submissions do not get 'approved' for posting. And yet you are the single most prolific poster to that group, according to the stats. Which means you are posting an *awful* lot of material, over twice as much as the next most prolific poster. Have you not considered a bit of self-criticism here? I do exercise restraint and review my replies, but when faced with a direct question I answer it as making comment on the uselessness of the question means my message is censored and not answering the question is returned with 'not furthering discussion'. Maybe in all that storm of postings you *are* being repetitive (I would not know, I killfiled you - for being repetitive). Because the questions are repeated. *This is a long standing issue relating to quantifiable PROOF on the relationship of techniques involved in wheelbuilding. *Do a search on the URCM indecent activity list when you are feeling bored. Yup, you have a bee in your bonnet and you are absolutely determined that everybody *must* accept your mathematically unsupportable assertions Verifiable by measurement in the scientific manner. and not the finite element analysis Immaginary world fails to consider the lateral deformation and the binding of spokes. carried out by a competent scientist. The simplification of the model makes it innacurate and it is not relevant to shock loading for which the suspension wheel is superb at coping with (when constructed of proper gauges). That is, I think you'll find, your problem not anyone else's. If you have a hot button topic (which many of us do) you have to learn that not everyone wants to hear about it, certainly not all the time, and accept the criticism that it will inevitably draw. It is not a conspiracy. You could maintain that killfile entry. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 04:40:40 -0700 (PDT), "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On May 9, 7:59*pm, thirty-six wrote: I've been biting my tongue so much my chilli sauce is made from tomatoes. *There is probably a third of my submissions do not get 'approved' for posting. And yet you are the single most prolific poster to that group, according to the stats. Which means you are posting an *awful* lot of material, over twice as much as the next most prolific poster. Have you not considered a bit of self-criticism here? Maybe in all that storm of postings you *are* being repetitive (I would not know, I killfiled you - for being repetitive) I - as ever - find it amazing that there are some people who insist on telling others that they have "kill-filed" them Why do they need to tell the person? Is it perhaps because they haven't - but they *want* the person to believe that they have. Chapman and Clinch are of course a dab hands at this - regularly telling people that they are kill-filed - and then at some time in the future "forgetting" and replying to their posts |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On May 23, 2:28*pm, 36 wrote:
I do exercise restraint and review my replies, but when faced with a direct question ... http://xkcd.com/386/ - for certain highly personalised values of wrong, in your case, since you are "the only man marching in step" on this one. -- Guy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On 22 May, 17:53, thirty-six wrote:
On 22 May, 15:57, "pk" wrote: "What you have to remember is that Guy is the" jerk. On 23 May, 12:40, "Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote: And yet you are the single most prolific poster to that group, according to the stats. Which means you are posting an *awful* lot of material, over twice as much as the next most prolific poster. Have you not considered a bit of self-criticism here? Maybe in all that storm of postings you *are* being repetitive (I would not know, I killfiled you - for being repetitive). Odd that you make a response to a message of mine within 24hrs of name- calling ofwhich I've avoided for some months. Imaginary kill files dont function when you read the 'kill-filed' postings. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On May 24, 8:58*pm, 36 wrote:
Odd that you make a response to a message of mine within 24hrs of name- calling ofwhich I've avoided for *some months. *Imaginary kill files dont function when you read the 'kill-filed' postings. Google Groups does not have a killfile. Do try to keep up at the back. -- Guy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On Wed, 26 May 2010 12:30:16 -0700 (PDT), "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On May 24, 8:58*pm, 36 wrote: Odd that you make a response to a message of mine within 24hrs of name- calling ofwhich I've avoided for *some months. *Imaginary kill files dont function when you read the 'kill-filed' postings. Google Groups does not have a killfile. Do try to keep up at the back. Yes - and they also force you to respond to those who are in your kill-file. I think you may be mentally ill. He's making trouble. He does it all with an apparent cast-iron faith in his hard-done-by innocence. Apparently, if you throw **** up in the air then stand around looking aggrieved, it's someone else's fault if it lands on you. Ian Smith 19 October 2009 commenting on Guy Chapman |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On May 26, 10:07*pm, JMS wrote:
Google Groups does not have a killfile. Do try to keep up at the back. Yes - and they also *force you to respond to those who are in your kill-file. Both you and he have made, according to the stats, a very large number of posts here, and I have had no difficulty whatsoever ignoring the vast majority of them (and I'm sure I'm not alone in that). I think you may be mentally ill. From you, that can only be taken as a compliment. -- Guy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:31:04 -0700 (PDT), "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On May 26, 10:07*pm, JMS wrote: Google Groups does not have a killfile. Do try to keep up at the back. Yes - and they also *force you to respond to those who are in your kill-file. Both you and he have made, according to the stats, a very large number of posts here, and I have had no difficulty whatsoever ignoring the vast majority of them (and I'm sure I'm not alone in that). I think you may be mentally ill. From you, that can only be taken as a compliment. You have proven the point yet again - well done. -- I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. I would challenge judith to find the place where I said I encourage my children to wear helmets. I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest.
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On May 26, 10:07 pm, JMS wrote: Google Groups does not have a killfile. Do try to keep up at the back. Yes - and they also force you to respond to those who are in your kill-file. Both you and he have made, according to the stats, a very large number of posts here, and I have had no difficulty whatsoever ignoring the vast majority of them (and I'm sure I'm not alone in that). I think you may be mentally ill. From you, that can only be taken as a compliment. -- Guy I don't know - most things from JMS can probably be taken as a suppository! Colin -- Murphy's Law – If anything can go wrong, it will. Parkinson's Law – Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion Cole's Law – Thinly sliced cabbage. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
URCM -why not to bother with it. Fascism at its finest. | Mike Tomlinson[_3_] | UK | 1 | May 21st 10 04:03 PM |
Fascism | [email protected] | General | 41 | January 11th 08 08:37 AM |
World's Finest Road Saddle | unisk8r | Unicycling | 61 | January 23rd 07 01:31 PM |
Norfolk's finest is almost blind | wafflycat | UK | 6 | July 6th 06 10:09 PM |
2000 fuji finest question | Greg Evans | General | 0 | December 2nd 04 05:54 AM |