|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
aeek Wrote: Ceiling racks! Perfect for that empty space above the bed. But they obscure the mirrors! hippy -- hippy |
Ads |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
Michael Warner Wrote: On 6 Jan 2006 05:46:09 -0800, Bleve wrote: Myth. Except when sprinting, you don't pull up. Or if you do, you're wasting energy. True, although I've read that you should pull up enough to counteract the dead weight of each non-pedalling leg. I have no idea how you could learn to do this without the help of pressure sensors in your pedals, though :-) I expect he does reach down and loosen the strap, in fact. [/color] There's an article about "unweighting" the non-pedaling foot floating around somewhere. You don't pull up as such (I think it was proved to be a waste of energy anyway) rather you lift enough to reduce the load on the pedaling foot. You're not pulling on the pedal you are just lifting your non-pedaling foot. I've seen power graphs of the pedal stroke so I guess there is equipment to measure it. Don't know if a standard power meter can do it though. They seem to measure Left/Right power split.. hmm.. hippy -- hippy |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
In aus.bicycle on Sat, 7 Jan 2006 04:25:15 +1100
hippy wrote: There's an article about "unweighting" the non-pedaling foot floating around somewhere. You don't pull up as such (I think it was proved to be a waste of energy anyway) rather you lift enough to reduce the load on the pedaling foot. You're not pulling on the pedal you are just lifting your non-pedaling foot. Which would mean that you don't need your straps tight. I found that snug straps over street shoes - usually some form of running shoe with tread - worked nicely for commuting. I could spin and handle bumps, and get into and out of them easily. Didn't have to spend a lot of money on fancy gear and have special shoes. I think the last time I looked in a bike shop they didn't have such things, and it was one of the reasons I didn't buy a bike to replace the grotty old MTB. I didn't want the hassle of clipless. Zebee |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
hippy wrote: aeek Wrote: Ceiling racks! Perfect for that empty space above the bed. But they obscure the mirrors! You can use them as trapeze |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
"Zebee Johnstone" wrote in message .. . In aus.bicycle on Sat, 7 Jan 2006 04:25:15 +1100 hippy wrote: There's an article about "unweighting" the non-pedaling foot floating around somewhere. You don't pull up as such (I think it was proved to be a waste of energy anyway) rather you lift enough to reduce the load on the pedaling foot. You're not pulling on the pedal you are just lifting your non-pedaling foot. Which would mean that you don't need your straps tight. I found that snug straps over street shoes - usually some form of running shoe with tread - worked nicely for commuting. I could spin and handle bumps, and get into and out of them easily. Didn't have to spend a lot of money on fancy gear and have special shoes. I think the last time I looked in a bike shop they didn't have such things, and it was one of the reasons I didn't buy a bike to replace the grotty old MTB. I didn't want the hassle of clipless. Zebee You could always swap the old pedals over onto the new bike. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
"Random Data" wrote in message ...
XC whippets get the ****s when you do that as well, but I think I might try singlespeeding at the crits tomorrow. Oh no! There might be a big SS turnout, we had 3 on Wednesday night. Parbs |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:00:20 +0000, Zebee Johnstone wrote:
I think the last time I looked in a bike shop they didn't have such things, and it was one of the reasons I didn't buy a bike to replace the grotty old MTB. I didn't want the hassle of clipless. That's odd. I know a bike shop that's been open for about 2 months that already has a box full of the bloody things. It's in the workshop, because toe straps are great for holding things in place while you manipulate other bits. If you're after some, contact me via email -- Dave Hughes | "SCSI is *not* magic. There are fundamental technical reasons why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then." - Daniel M. Drucker |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
Zebee Johnstone wrote: In aus.bicycle on Sat, 7 Jan 2006 04:25:15 +1100 hippy wrote: There's an article about "unweighting" the non-pedaling foot floating around somewhere. You don't pull up as such (I think it was proved to be a waste of energy anyway) rather you lift enough to reduce the load on the pedaling foot. You're not pulling on the pedal you are just lifting your non-pedaling foot. Which would mean that you don't need your straps tight. I found that snug straps over street shoes - usually some form of running shoe with tread - worked nicely for commuting. I could spin and handle bumps, and get into and out of them easily. Didn't have to spend a lot of money on fancy gear and have special shoes. I think the last time I looked in a bike shop they didn't have such things, and it was one of the reasons I didn't buy a bike to replace the grotty old MTB. I didn't want the hassle of clipless. We sell toestraps and pedals with them. There's always luddites around ... some ride guzzis ... |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:23:16 +1100, Aeek wrote:
nah, downhill, power from gravity. By the time (not long) I decided this was too fast I was only game to stop further acceleration. Figured slowing down would cause a crash. Yeah, but your idea of "too fast" could well be higher than theirs, even allowing for a bike that's probably better suited to the conditions. I took my brother, who hasn't ridden for about 5 years, for a ride - he had my 5" duallie, I had a rigid SS and I was faster both up and down hills. -- Dave Hughes | "SCSI is *not* magic. There are fundamental technical reasons why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then." - Daniel M. Drucker |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
New Year pedolutionists
aeek wrote:
Euan Wrote: Michael Warner writes: On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:04:52 GMT, daveL wrote: I'm not entirely sure what this comment is getting at though. Ok, I'll spell it out - the problem is that MTBs are slow and wide, and trying to pass them safely is often a bit of a worry in busy traffic. Then exercise some god-dammed common courtesy and wait. You have no right to go faster than the person in front of you. Um, from how I read Michael he is waiting - not like the clowns who blow past my ear at red lights. Showing courtesy is one thing, being happy about it can be another. Usually someone riding those funny little bikes with the really low seats ... what are they? (Those *young people* and their crazy bikes.) jimmay |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LeJog year | Brian G | UK | 0 | October 2nd 05 01:12 PM |
Have your hurricane in a swing state in an election year | 41 | Techniques | 81 | September 10th 05 04:03 PM |
One year on | LSMike | UK | 9 | July 5th 05 05:52 PM |
Want to know what year... anything will help | bear | General | 1 | November 29th 04 11:15 PM |
One year ago today - progress calendar | fattyjules | Unicycling | 5 | June 1st 04 05:04 AM |