|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas, for example, ...
=v= We were talking about cities with commuter rail and bikestations. If you want to completely change the subject, at least change the "Subject:" -- and as Dallas is not in the UK, you might want to change "Newsgroups:" accordingly. _Jym_ |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
in message , Pat ')
wrote: Dallas, for example, is spread out over many miles. That made it more difficult for bicycle commuting and easier for automobile commuting. Chicken, meet egg. Egg, meet chicken. I'm sure you two will get along just fine. Simon, thinking there must be something odd in the Texas gene pool. -- (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/ [ This .sig subject to change without notice ] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"Jym Dyer" wrote in message ... : Dallas, for example, ... : : =v= We were talking about cities with commuter rail and : bikestations. If you want to completely change the subject, : at least change the "Subject:" -- and as Dallas is not in : the UK, you might want to change "Newsgroups:" accordingly. : _Jym_ I was responding to her jab at America. And, YOU might want to take a look at the newsgroups she posted to. Pat in TX |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
: : This works best if you've got a bikestation at *every* train : : stop, not just a handful of them, and unfortunately the U.S. : : doesn't make biking *or* rail much of a priority. : : : : : : Yeah well, it's against the Amercan Way, ain't it? : : : : Futzin Commie! ;° : : : : EFR : : Ile de France : : No, it's not "against the American Way". It's just that this country grew : in a different way from Europe. The cities are structured differently, : except for the port cities. Dallas, for example, is spread out over many : miles. That made it more difficult for bicycle commuting and easier for : automobile commuting. Throw in the summer heat and strong winds into that : equation, too. If you work 25 miles from where you live, that tends to make : it difficult for bicycle commuting. Let's don't get started on blaming : entire populations or using generalities based on country, shall we? : : Pat in TX : : Mm, Pat? It looked to me like she was just making fun of : the stereotype... : : -km It looked to me like she was saying something sharp and then trying to take some of the sting out with a smiley face. Pat in TX |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
On 25 Oct 2004 11:54:45 -0700, Jym Dyer wrote:
Dallas, for example, ... =v= We were talking about cities with commuter rail and bikestations. If you want to completely change the subject, at least change the "Subject:" -- and as Dallas is not in the UK, you might want to change "Newsgroups:" accordingly. _Jym_ You MUST have a Dallas in the UK. All of our (US) cities are named after cities in England. Oh, then it would be NewDallas wouldn't it? Never mind. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
dgk wrote:
You MUST have a Dallas in the UK. All of our (US) cities are named after cities in England. Oh, then it would be NewDallas wouldn't it? Never mind. We have. In Hairy McScotland. Nearest biggish place Elgin. It worries me that I possess this information. -- Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/ World Domination? Just find a world that's into that kind of thing, then chain to the floor and walk up and down on it in high heels. (Mr. Sunshine) |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Simon Brooke wrote: Chicken, meet egg. Egg, meet chicken. I'm sure you two will get along just fine. Since it has reached the point that many communities do not even have sidewalks for pedestrians, let alone cyclable routes, I do think there is a vicious circle in operation. You get urbanization based on the car, and then you end up making it impossible to live any other way. And then you get the SUV lobbies and the oil addiction and the irreversible need to consume so much that there would have to be 9 planets to make it sustainable. EFR Ile de France |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
: Simon Brooke wrote: : : Chicken, meet egg. Egg, meet chicken. I'm sure you two will get along : just fine. : : Since it has reached the point that many communities do not even have : sidewalks for pedestrians, let alone cyclable routes, I do think there is : a vicious circle in operation. You get urbanization based on the car, and : then you end up making it impossible to live any other way. And then you : get the SUV lobbies and the oil addiction and the irreversible need to : consume so much that there would have to be 9 planets to make it : sustainable. : : EFR : Ile de France Well, you are correct in that urbanization based on the car makes it terrifically difficult to cycle to work. Our Interstate Highways, for example, do not permit bicycles even on the paved shoulders. So, to weave a torturous route to work 25 miles away would nearly double the distance---if it could be figured out logistically. As for the SUV people, as I hear their remarks, their main rationalization for buying one is "to protect my family" even though that cannot be proven (they are relying upon sheer bulk for safety). Also, the regulation of the SUVs here as not being under the gas mileage figures that automobiles have to meet has resulted in the production of SUVs that do not use gas wisely (an understatement). In fact, I read that the number 1 complaint of new Hummer owners has been that they are surprised how poor its gas mileage usage figures are. Now, that could mean that new Hummer owners are just plain stupid, too. How could they NOT know that such a beast would get poor gas mileage? Pat in TX : |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Elisa Francesca Roselli wrote:
Since it has reached the point that many communities do not even have sidewalks for pedestrians, let alone cyclable routes, I do think there is a vicious circle in operation. You get urbanization based on the car, and then you end up making it impossible to live any other way. And then you get the SUV lobbies and the oil addiction and the irreversible need to consume so much that there would have to be 9 planets to make it sustainable. The problem really isn't the SUV/oil lobby, it's that developers move to the ouskirts of the city to build -- where there are no costs/hassles to integrate their projects with anything else, or requirements to build sidewalks, etc. They do build bike routes and sidewalks when they think their customers demand them. Unfortunately, most new home buyers already have cars, and don't care enough. Matt O. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
dgk wrote:
On 25 Oct 2004 11:54:45 -0700, Jym Dyer wrote: Dallas, for example, ... =v= We were talking about cities with commuter rail and bikestations. If you want to completely change the subject, at least change the "Subject:" -- and as Dallas is not in the UK, you might want to change "Newsgroups:" accordingly. _Jym_ You MUST have a Dallas in the UK. All of our (US) cities are named after cities in England. Oh, then it would be NewDallas wouldn't it? Never mind. Not quite. I there is a Dallas in Scotland. I've also been near to Berlin in New Hampshire and an other in Wisconsin. There is not a Berlin in England as far as I'm aware. -- Mark 1x1 wheel, 3x2 wheels & 1x3 wheels. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|