Critical Mass - productive campaign to promote cycling or...

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:01:28 +0100, Bertie Wiggins
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:19:06 +0100, The Nottingham Duck
wrote:

Dragging your sorry arse over here from "Clarkson" with the same
trollish point.

I note that you avoid the question.

I don't need to answer the question.

I OWN YOU !

Keep up the replies , my little slave . I command you !

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:01:28 +0100, Bertie Wiggins
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:19:06 +0100, The Nottingham Duck
wrote:

Dragging your sorry arse over here from "Clarkson" with the same
trollish point.

I note that you avoid the question.

Since I own your sorry arse I don't need to.


I expect a reply from you within the hour.

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:34:13 +0100, The Nottingham Duck
wrote:

I note that you avoid the question.

Since I own your sorry arse I don't need to.


I expect a reply from you within the hour.

Is that a parting shot?

You may have the final word.

I submit that on or about Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:34:37 +0100, the person
known to the court as The Nottingham Duck
made a statement
in Your Honour's bundle)
to the following effect:

As I mentioned before,isn't it funny that people who are losing
arguments always call the other person a 'troll' before vanishing in
shame.

I refer the hon. pot to message ID
, in respect of a different
kettle.

Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

"To every complex problem there is a solution which is
simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:48:27 +0100, Bertie Wiggins
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:34:13 +0100, The Nottingham Duck
wrote:

I note that you avoid the question.

Since I own your sorry arse I don't need to.


I expect a reply from you within the hour.

Is that a parting shot?

You may have the final word.


And thus you rid yourselves of trolls !