|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:50:41 +0000, jobst.brandt wrote:
Friday I was coming home and there was some traffic. Motorists were honking as usual. One actually honked and buzzed me when there was no traffic. I just don't understand some people. That's a good sign you are not riding well. You have got to be joking. Do you seriously expect people that any fat arse car driver knows more about riding a bicycle that someone whose arse is actually on the bicycle seat. I can hardly wait to hear what the ones whose passenger leans oout of the window and tries to push you off indicates. and it is obvious to motorists that a self righteous statement is being made. Is knowledge of the road rules pertaining to bicycles a must pass section of the test for gaining a motor vehicle drivers license in your country? I thin its better for you to ride SAFELY, rather than to project your ineptitude on motorists. Any chance you can stop doing that here? |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
Tom Keats wrote:
You made the right choice by riding where you would be noticed. But I would recommend some way to keep a wether eye out for the traffic behind you, like a mirror of some type. "Fred" though it may sound, it looks a lot better than a body cast or casket. Compliments of: "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman" If you want to E-mail me use: ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net Ironically, mirrors are least-needed in an environment where is the heaviest traffic, because it can be assumed somebody's riding up your rear wheel. In other words, on a busy highway, the mirror might help law enforcement figure out who ran you down (from the imprinted image of the car on your retina), but beyond that, well, if you're riding in the middle of the lane, on a busy highway, and expect to have the mirror tell you something other than that there's constantly a car behind you... I used a mirror for a while, but found my ears, for my route, were good enough. And, as mentioned, the mirror was most-useful on less-traveled roads, where a car might get to sneak up on me. If I was insane enough to use an iPod (both ears) while riding, yeah, I'd need a mirror full time. And make sure my life insurance was paid up. My hearing is adequately acute, but it's non-directional. So if I hear something, I often have to look around to see where the sound is coming from. I find mirrors quite helpful. I thought you said you already heard the car. I find useful to make a cursory head movement to look over the left shoulder, more to let the motor vehicle know I am aware of its presence more than wanting 5to look at it. This assures the driver that the bicyclist isn't about to swerve out into the lane, knowing that a motor vehicle is passing. Body language (riding a straight line close to the edge of the road) is a courtesy a bicyclist can offer to make "sharing the road" a reality, rather than just a sign we often see on narrow roads. Unfortunately, bicyclists often think these signs are directed at motorists rather than bicyclists. Jobst Brandt |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
Mike Jarrells wrote:
I recently started training for my first Century. I started riding my bicycle to work three days a week. It's about 15 miles one way. It's a good ride, but the only legal route is a four lane that has a 55 mile per hour speed limit. When I first started riding I would get pushed off of the road by tractor trailers because I stayed too close to the curb. After reading more about bicycle safety I now ride 3 to five feet from the curb or in the middle of the lane if I have traffic on both sides. Exiting and merging lanes force me into this position. I think you have an unreal sense of how close vehicles can safely pass and the "pushed off the road" is most likely a perception you have from not understanding how traffic works. Training for a first century ride is a clue to this. Just go ride bike and don't feel you need to set records with an organized ride. You are probably not sure you can ride, so you need mental back-up with a sag wagon and other riders. Thia is the bicyclist for whom all the road signs of "Share the Road" are made, because they feel their rights are not being exerted enough. The discussions go on endlessly here on wreck.bike. Friday I was coming home and there was some traffic. Motorists were honking as usual. One actually honked and buzzed me when there was no traffic. I just don't understand some people. That's a good sign you are not riding well. I have had that experience a few times on roads where I never have contention, even though there is no shoulder or even paving outside the edge stripe. The honking and slicing occur when a "take the lane" rider joins me on one of these routes. They ride conspicuously as much as three feet farther into the lane than necessary, and it is obvious to motorists that a self righteous statement is being made. Near the end of my ride a police officer positioned himself behind me and alerted me to stop using his siren and lights. When I pulled over he called for backup which I thought was a little funny, but I guess you never know who you're going to meet on the road. He said he had received several calls stating that I was riding, "in the middle of the road." I told the officer I was riding, "in the middle of my lane" because that was the safest place for me to ride. He responded that he could not tell me to stop riding because I was riding legally, but he did ask me to be careful. I thanked him for his concern and went on my way. I think I'm being as careful as I can without reverting to my old behavior of driving my huge gas guzzling car which some argue is actually more dangerous. Oh yes, the police are the problem. I've heard it often from born again bicyclists. Take the lane! It seems that the motorists in my area are not educated on the rights of bicyclists or how to share the road. I feel like I'm helping to educate them, but I am a little concerned that one of them may do something criminal because I inconvenience them by forcing them to pass me. Righteous! This bicycling thing is a little tougher than I thought. It's not the exercise, but the people that makes it tough. You just don't know who you'll meet on the road. Oh oh! "For WHO the Bell Tolls". Where did you go to grade school? Please ride safe. I think its better for you to ride SAFELY, rather than to project your ineptitude on motorists. Jobst Brandt |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:17:46 -0800 in rec.bicycles.misc, "Mike
Jacoubowsky" wrote: I used a mirror for a while, but found my ears, for my route, were good enough. Well, that's fine for you. I've found mine indispensable, and I now feel blind without it. Just because you don't find it useful doesn't mean others shouldn't try one. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:09:42 -0800 in rec.bicycles.misc,
(Tom Keats) wrote: Especially since I've been passed so many times by fellow riders thatI didn't notice in the mirror because they were in the blind spot when they were behind me. No blind spot with my helmet mirror '^) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
terryc wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:50:41 +0000, jobst.brandt wrote: Friday I was coming home and there was some traffic. Motorists were honking as usual. One actually honked and buzzed me when there was no traffic. I just don't understand some people. That's a good sign you are not riding well. You have got to be joking. Do you seriously expect people that any fat arse car driver knows more about riding a bicycle that someone whose arse is actually on the bicycle seat. I'm not with you here. Just because you have 'rights' doesn't mean you should assert them to the detriment of the others on the road. Like it or not, but we SHARE the road with cagers. What would the cagers do if another cager was going the same speed as you do down that 55 mph roadway? They'd probably be more aggressive and assertive than they are with you. So you are being extended extraordinary courtesy. Even if you are content to be going 15 mph or so in a 55 mph zone (where others wish to go 60 mph or more) doesn't mean that it's courteous for you to force a 15 mph speed in 1/3 of the roadway. Worse, you are creating a hazard to yourself and to others as they come up on you, need to slow, then they pull out to pass you causing all sorts of traffic disruptions. We are in a PR battle here. We are fighting for not only acceptance from cagers but wish them to join us. Guys like you do more damage than I can say here to both those ends. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
"Dennis P. Harris" wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:17:46 -0800 in rec.bicycles.misc, "Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote: I used a mirror for a while, but found my ears, for my route, were good enough. Well, that's fine for you. I've found mine indispensable, and I now feel blind without it. Just because you don't find it useful doesn't mean others shouldn't try one. I didn't say others shouldn't try them. I said for my routes, I didn't need one. However, I feel some imply that you're not safe riding without a mirror, and I don't feel that's the case. If you feel better with a mirror, by all means, use a mirror. For what it's worth, I'd probably be inclined to use a mirror if I was riding in an environment that was dense with bikes, especially if some of them might be faster than me. On the other hand, maybe not. If I'm riding at a reasonable speed, in a predictable manner, there's no reason I should have to move out of the way for a cyclist overtaking me from behind. The greatest dangers on the road I face are cars overtaking me to make a right turn, and cars in the opposite direction making a left turn in front of me. The car overtaking me, so far, has not been an issue because cars make noise when they accelerate. In fact, cars make noise whenever they do most dumb anti-cyclist things, whether engine or tires. When electric cars become the norm, and drivers in them aggressive, THEN I can seriously see myself riding with a mirror again. Remember, this is all about me. What makes other people comfortable will be different. I just don't want to see this (mirrors) added to the mandatory list of things you must have or else you're not cycling safely. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Pulled Over By Police
On Jan 12, 9:48*am, slide wrote:
I'm not with you here. Just because you have 'rights' doesn't mean you should assert them to the detriment of the others on the road. Like it or not, but we SHARE the road with cagers. Just because you have rights doesn't mean you should assert them??? Damn! So much for voting, free speech, free press... and I guess I'll just have to hope the local air base doesn't demand to quarter some servicemen in my house! What would the cagers do if another cager was going the same speed as you do down that 55 mph roadway? They'd probably be more aggressive and assertive than they are with you. So you are being extended extraordinary courtesy. Even if you are content to be going 15 mph or so in a 55 mph zone (where others wish to go 60 mph or more) doesn't mean that it's courteous for you to force a 15 mph speed in 1/3 of the roadway. In my rural road riding, I've seen many examples of farm tractors moving from field to field on 55 mph roads. Also, we have a very large Amish population within my riding area, and they travel by buggy on those same roads. I ride faster than the latter, and have enjoyed drafting the former. Should their rights to the road also be removed? 55 mph is an upper speed limit, not a lower speed limit. Worse, you are creating a hazard to yourself and to others as they come up on you, need to slow, then they pull out to pass you causing all sorts of traffic disruptions. I have no sympathy for such handwringing arguments. By some standards, I am "creating a hazard to myself" any time I balance on a bicycle - or, for that matter, walk down the stairs. But when I ride among motor vehicles, the hazard comes from them, not from me. Arguing otherwise is like telling pedestrians they should never cross the street. Motorists are legally bound to operate in a manner that's safe for others. We should not be working to reduce their responsibility. We are in a PR battle here. We are fighting for not only acceptance from cagers but wish them to join us. Guys like you do more damage than I can say here to both those ends. I agree we are fighting a PR battle. Unfortunately, I think the "never inconvenience a motorist" crew are fighting for the wrong side. Our society has done far too much to make the world as convenient as possible for motorists. We've already built much of America so it's impossible to simply walk anywhere, even to buy a loaf of bread. We don't need to add the prohibition to never ride a bike if it will delay a motorist. Let me be clear about a few things: First, for aesthetic reasons, I prefer cycling on roads with less traffic. But there are many situations where I must ride on a busier road. I have a legal right to do that, and nobody has a right to tell me I must use a car to get to destinations on such a road. Second, I _do_ share the lane whenever it's safe. Like Forester, I sometimes share lanes that I'm sure other cyclists would not. On occasion, I've pulled over to let cars pass. But if, in my expert judgment, it's unsafe to share a lane with a passing vehicle, I will not put myself in danger to save some motorist a few seconds. His desire to catch one more commercial on TV does not trump my legal right to the road. Third, I've remember having the experience of the OP, where riding too close to the edge generated unsafely close passes; and I remember when I first learned to fix that by moving left so the motorists were forced to use the next lane, and even (gasp!) occasionally wait a few seconds to pass. I have friends who learned about this from me, and praised the difference it made in their riding. Most motorists understand the situation and are fine with it. The few that don't are probably irritated about everything in life anyway; kowtowing to them won't make them significantly happier. Politeness is good. Deferring to others by putting yourself in danger is bad. So is relinquishing your right to the road. - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Have you been pulled over by the Police? | bugman | Unicycling | 25 | May 9th 08 01:55 PM |
TdF -- ZDF has pulled its coverage! | Trevor A Panther | UK | 14 | July 25th 07 09:27 AM |
Pulled over by police | David_Stone | Unicycling | 17 | September 29th 05 11:51 AM |
Pulled over by police | David Stone | Unicycling | 4 | September 28th 05 09:52 PM |
kh pulled a microsoft? | thinuniking | Unicycling | 41 | March 23rd 04 05:41 PM |