|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Metronome a crazy idea?
I'm considering using a metronome on my training rides. The digital device
has cadences from 40 to over 200. Any usefulness in this? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Metronome a crazy idea?
Pat Fleming wrote:
: I'm considering using a metronome on my training rides. The digital device : has cadences from 40 to over 200. Any usefulness in this? I've used it and it works. But a cheap bike computer is really easy to set up for measuring your cadence as well, so I nowadays use that approach. The metronome could be more accurate and convenient if you have a major point about keeping the exact cadence. -- Risto Varanka | http://www.helsinki.fi/~rvaranka/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Metronome a crazy idea?
Kevan Smith wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 04:29:56 GMT, "Pat Fleming" from Optimum Online wrote: I'm considering using a metronome on my training rides. The digital device has cadences from 40 to over 200. Any usefulness in this? No. I'm a musician, so I have a digital metronome. One day I took it out on a ride. Trying to match cadence to a beat takes all the fun out of riding, and it's irritating. Instead, just get a bike computer with a cadence indicator. I agree. If you need a rhythm, listen to some jams. For me its like dancing on the bike. CRM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Metronome a crazy idea?
"Pat Fleming" wrote in message ... I'm considering using a metronome on my training rides. The digital device has cadences from 40 to over 200. Any usefulness in this? One Mississippi, Two Missippippi Cadence counts, especially for casual cyclists. or for me, I find myself counting in groups of four. And how do you get the pendulum to swing accurately. It sems to me that road surface would effect regularity. Tongue in cheek, Bart |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Metronome a crazy idea? | Sorni | General | 2 | December 10th 03 02:56 AM |