Chapman's Day of Fame

Some time ago it became apparent that Chapman was beginning to worry about some
of the things which he done, and some of the things which he said in public.

After all he had accused someone of committing some quite serious stuff -
visiting his house, making nuisance phone calls, involving his children,
involving his wife. All of course accusations with no proof ever shown.

He also felt it extremely important to write up his account of his court case
and post it to the web immediately - even though he was tired and emotional.

Fame at last?

Most odd.

Surely if he had gone to the police with the real name (which he knew) of the
person known as Nuxx Bar and all of his convincing evidence, then the police
would have spoken to Nuxx Bar. I would think that that would have put the wind
up him.

Well there are still some unanswered questions:

What was the purpose of the whole exercise?

Why did he not get a police trace and recording of the nuisance phone calls he
alleged were being made and complain to the police about Nuxx Bar?

If Nuxx Bar had done anything wrong at all - would not the hand on the shoulder
from the police have been sufficient for him to stop whatever he was accused
of doing?

What information did his NP order give him to supply to the police - over and
above that which they themselves could have obtained through their normal
routes?

Why did he lie over the date he removed the Nuxx Bar web page?

Why did he remove the web page "The link that never changed?"

Why did he remove the web page "The page that never changed?"

Why has he made out that it was not he who registered an email address purely
in order to abuse Nuxx Bar - but he actually has never denied it.

Was he aware of all the information which had been collected about his own
actions?

Why did he start to squirm when it was pointed out that he could get quite a
grilling when his famous case went to court?

Why did he pooh pooh the idea of a QC being involved and asking *him* very
embarrassing questions when he (a Christian) was under oath?

Had he really been squeaky clean all along?

Was he beginning to sweat?



And now most importantly:

Has he asked for the charges against Nuxx Bar to be dropped - and if so why?


Over to you Chapman - you know how interested people were in your court cases.

But please try not to lie as you normally do.


NB This is X-posted to the groups where the original discussions took place -
but follow-ups are set to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal

On Jan 16, 5:35*pm, Judith wrote:
Some time ago it became apparent that Chapman was beginning to worry about some
of the things which he done, and some of the things which he said in public.

What has this to do with you?

Paul

On 16 jan, 19:05, Gloucestershire railway man
wrote:
On Jan 16, 5:35*pm, Judith wrote:

Some time ago it became apparent that Chapman was beginning to worry about some
of the things which he done, and some of the things which he said in public.

What has this to do with you?

Paul

Or us? Or cycling?

Judith wrote:
Why has he made out that it was not he who registered an email
address purely in order to abuse Nuxx Bar - but he actually has never
denied it.

I'm totally lost by what this sentence means? It seems to contradict itself.

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:53:05 -0000, "GB" wrote:

Judith wrote:
Why has he made out that it was not he who registered an email
address purely in order to abuse Nuxx Bar - but he actually has never
denied it.

I'm totally lost by what this sentence means? It seems to contradict itself.




Sorry - a poor construction.

He has made out that it was not he who registered the email address which was
used to abuse Nuxx Bar.

BUT - when he is actually asked the direct question - did you make that post?
he will not answer the question with a clear "no" - despite there being clear
proof that it was he who made the post. ie he has never actually clearly denied
it.

He does this an awful lot - he will imply something is true when it is not, he
will obfuscate - and also he does do outright lies - but when caught does not
own up.

He had a web page called the "Page that never changed" - regarding another web
page of his.

He was of course making out that the page in question had never changed.

When asked directly : "If you read all of the page one day - and then read it
again all the next day - would what you read be exactly the same".

One would have thought if the page had *never* changed then the simple answer
would be "yes". But he refuses to answer the direct question - and yet he will
obfuscate until the cows come home.

On Jan 16, 7:20*pm, Judith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:53:05 -0000, "GB" wrote:
Judith wrote:
Why has he made out that it was not he who registered an email
address purely in order to abuse Nuxx Bar - but he actually has never
denied it.

I'm totally lost by what this sentence means? It seems to contradict itself.

Sorry - a poor construction.

One would have thought if the page had *never* changed then the simple answer
would be "yes". *But he refuses to answer the direct question - and yet he will
obfuscate until the cows come home.

But you still haven't answered my question. "What has this to do with
you"?

Paul

Gloucestershire railway man wrote:


But you still haven't answered my question. "What has this to do with
you"?

I wondered about that too. Is Judith trying to right some great wrong? It
seems awfully important to Judith.




--
Register as an organ donor with the NHS online. It takes 1 minute and
saves you carrying an organ donor card with you.
http://www.uktransplant.org.uk/ukt/h...me_a_donor.jsp

On 16-Jan-2012, Judith wrote:

Some time ago it became apparent that Chapman was beginning to worry about
some
of the things which he done, and some of the things which he said in
public.

For ****s sake Judith he may well be a self deluded odious little toad but
don't you think there's better things you can be wasting your life on.

--

All the best,

Periander

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:30:06 GMT, "Periander" wrote:


On 16-Jan-2012, Judith wrote:

Some time ago it became apparent that Chapman was beginning to worry about
some
of the things which he done, and some of the things which he said in
public.

For ****s sake Judith he may well be a self deluded odious little toad but
don't you think there's better things you can be wasting your life on.


I was very ****ed off with his whole approach to the Norwich Pharmacal issue
and the fact that he was organising a ****-up on the strength of potentially
ruining someone's life.

I really wondered why he was doing it - other than for self-gratification

I understood that the person seeking the NP court order must have a genuine
intention of commencing proceedings; and that other means of obtaining evidence
must be exhausted before resorting to the Norwich Pharmacal.

I had my doubts if either of these were true and was surprised that the judge
did not query "all other means exhausted" - as they obviously weren't. His
economy with the truth is renowned.

I wonder what the court would say if he has now withdrawn his police complaint
given that he told the judge that was why he wanted the information - to give
to the police. Also - why has he withdrawn his complaint? **** scared of
appearing in court and being questioned on oath I would wager.

Another possibility is that the police have slung it out as there is just no
case to answer; again - that would not surprise me either - we only had his
word for all he claimed - no sign of any evidence.

On Jan 16, 6:15*pm, Telegram Spam wrote:
On 16 jan, 19:05, Gloucestershire railway man

wrote:
On Jan 16, 5:35*pm, Judith wrote:

Some time ago it became apparent that Chapman was beginning to worry about some
of the things which he done, and some of the things which he said in public.

What has this to do with you?

Paul

Or us? Or cycling?

Or reality?

--
Simon Mason