Homos Fight Notifying New Mothers of HIV Babies

"Anonymous" ] wrote in message
...
"New York AIDS Panel Encourages Doctors to Test Pregnant Women"
New York Times (02/25/94) P. A1 (Navarro, Mireya)
Concerned that it would jeopardize the privacy rights of new
mothers, New York State panel of AIDS advisors yesterday
rejected a controversial proposal to identify HIV©positive
newborns. The panel instead recommended that physicians be
required to "strongly encourage" all pregnant women and new
mothers to be tested for the virus, in hopes of administering
early care to babies who are infected. Although the Health
Department©©for the purpose of tracking the disease©©currently
tests all babies born in the state, the tests are anonymous and
neither doctor nor patient knows the results. Identifying the
infant, however, would be parallel to testing the mother without
her consent, since a positive test for the child means the mother
is infected. In this light, the proposal clashed with strict
state HIV testing laws which require written consent. Four
doctors on the panel who disagreed with the final recommendations
countered that recent advances in treatment make it possible,
through early identification, to prolong the lives of infected
babies.

COMMENTS: SEND THE KID HOME SO IT CAN INFECT IT'S BROTHERS AND
SISTERS. YOU ARE ALSO DENYING THE BABY AND MOTHER MEDICAL ATTENTION.
THIS NONSENSE WAS FINALLY OVERTURNED AFTER SOME YEARS AND THOUSANDS OF
DEATHS OF INFECTED MOTHERS AND INFANTS.

THE HOMOSEXUALS WERE DETERMINED TO KILL AS MANY HETEROSEXUALS AS
POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO SPEND ENOURMOUS SUMS
OF MONEY ON AIDS, WHEN ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS QUIT STICKING THEIR
DICKS IN THE RECTUMS OF OTHER HOMOS.

"Newscorp" wrote in message
...

"Anonymous" ] wrote in message
...
"New York AIDS Panel Encourages Doctors to Test Pregnant Women"
New York Times (02/25/94) P. A1 (Navarro, Mireya)
Concerned that it would jeopardize the privacy rights of new
mothers, New York State panel of AIDS advisors yesterday
rejected a controversial proposal to identify HIV©positive
newborns. The panel instead recommended that physicians be
required to "strongly encourage" all pregnant women and new
mothers to be tested for the virus, in hopes of administering
early care to babies who are infected. Although the Health
Department©©for the purpose of tracking the disease©©currently
tests all babies born in the state, the tests are anonymous and
neither doctor nor patient knows the results. Identifying the
infant, however, would be parallel to testing the mother without
her consent, since a positive test for the child means the mother
is infected. In this light, the proposal clashed with strict
state HIV testing laws which require written consent. Four
doctors on the panel who disagreed with the final recommendations
countered that recent advances in treatment make it possible,
through early identification, to prolong the lives of infected
babies.

COMMENTS: SEND THE KID HOME SO IT CAN INFECT IT'S BROTHERS AND
SISTERS. YOU ARE ALSO DENYING THE BABY AND MOTHER MEDICAL ATTENTION.
THIS NONSENSE WAS FINALLY OVERTURNED AFTER SOME YEARS AND THOUSANDS OF
DEATHS OF INFECTED MOTHERS AND INFANTS.

THE HOMOSEXUALS WERE DETERMINED TO KILL AS MANY HETEROSEXUALS AS
POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO SPEND ENOURMOUS SUMS
OF MONEY ON AIDS, WHEN ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS QUIT STICKING THEIR
DICKS IN THE RECTUMS OF OTHER HOMOS.