none

"Italy Anonymous Remailer" wrote in message
...
Subject: Homos Seek To Legalise Sex In Public Lavatories

Why do you think you are seeing more and more bathroom scenes of men
urinating on TV and in movies? Why did you see all those bathroom
scenes in Allie McBeal, where the lawyers - male and female, used the
common bathroom as a conference room? Why were there so many bathroom
scenes in NYPD Blue? Because the homosexual producers, directors, etc.,
want to desensitive the general public to such scenes in order to
legitimatize the homosexual use of public bathrooms for 'cruising'
grounds. Now they want to legalize such usuage in England.

http://www.antipas.org/news/news_200...alize_sex.html

By Philip Johnston, Home Affairs Editor, London Telegraph, Feb. 11, 2000

CAMPAIGNERS pressing for the age of consent for homosexuals to be
reduced to 16 have set out an agenda for future reforms that would
legalise gay sex in saunas, public lavatories and "cruising" areas.

They have made clear that yesterday's Bill to equalise the ages of
consent for homosexual and heterosexual acts is only the start of a
concerted effort to remove all legislative restrictions upon homosexual
activity and relationships. A submission to the Home Office by the
organisation OutRage, led by Peter Tatchell, says: "We do not believe
that consensual actions between adults, no matter how bizarre they
might appear to the majority, are any concern of the law or its agents.
Thus we seek to legitimise consenting actions in bath-houses and
saunas, 'backrooms' in pubs, and all group sex in private, including
sado-masochistic games."

The submission, to a Home Office review of sex offences, adds: "We
would also like to extend the concept of private to include public
lavatory cubicles and after-dark 'cruising' areas. Since recreational
sex is a natural activity and popular pursuit, all laws which seek to
control it should be abolished . . . The whole basis of the current
homosexual control laws is moralistic and based on a largely medieval
concept of Christianity which we believe has no place in a pluralistic
democratic society."

OutRage accepts that "abuse of trust" between adults and minors should
be punishable, though "sensitive consideration should be given to
examples of experimentation between those just above and just below a
fixed age of consent".

Activists are determined to remove all discriminatory legislation that
treats homosexual activity as morally different or inferior to
heterosexual liaisons. They even want common law offences of "outraging
public decency" - which in theory should be non-discriminatory -
abolished. As well as equal workplace and tax rights, campaigners also
want same-sex couples to be regarded as next of kin for purposes of
pensions, wills, tax, housing and adoption.

The Government is already considering the extension of the criminal
injuries compensation scheme to pay a homosexual lover up to £10,000
compensation for bereavement after a crime in the same way that a
husband or wife would be paid to recognise the emotional impact of
their loss. The Law Commission has since recommended that homosexuals
should have the right to claim damages if they were financially
dependent on a lover who died through someone else's negligence.

Financial support need not be direct, but could include providing a
home which is lost as a result of the death. At present, only spouses,
other relatives and co-habitees of the opposite sex are entitled. The
law is increasingly moving towards the recognition of rights for same-
sex couples.

Last year the Lords ruled that a homosexual couple in a stable
relationship could be defined as a family. Voluntary agencies and the
state are also signing up to the agenda.

"Newscorp" wrote in message
...

"Italy Anonymous Remailer" wrote in message
...
Subject: Homos Seek To Legalise Sex In Public Lavatories

Why do you think you are seeing more and more bathroom scenes of men
urinating on TV and in movies? Why did you see all those bathroom
scenes in Allie McBeal, where the lawyers - male and female, used the
common bathroom as a conference room? Why were there so many bathroom
scenes in NYPD Blue? Because the homosexual producers, directors, etc.,
want to desensitive the general public to such scenes in order to
legitimatize the homosexual use of public bathrooms for 'cruising'
grounds. Now they want to legalize such usuage in England.

http://www.antipas.org/news/news_200...alize_sex.html

By Philip Johnston, Home Affairs Editor, London Telegraph, Feb. 11, 2000

CAMPAIGNERS pressing for the age of consent for homosexuals to be
reduced to 16 have set out an agenda for future reforms that would
legalise gay sex in saunas, public lavatories and "cruising" areas.

They have made clear that yesterday's Bill to equalise the ages of
consent for homosexual and heterosexual acts is only the start of a
concerted effort to remove all legislative restrictions upon homosexual
activity and relationships. A submission to the Home Office by the
organisation OutRage, led by Peter Tatchell, says: "We do not believe
that consensual actions between adults, no matter how bizarre they
might appear to the majority, are any concern of the law or its agents.
Thus we seek to legitimise consenting actions in bath-houses and
saunas, 'backrooms' in pubs, and all group sex in private, including
sado-masochistic games."

The submission, to a Home Office review of sex offences, adds: "We
would also like to extend the concept of private to include public
lavatory cubicles and after-dark 'cruising' areas. Since recreational
sex is a natural activity and popular pursuit, all laws which seek to
control it should be abolished . . . The whole basis of the current
homosexual control laws is moralistic and based on a largely medieval
concept of Christianity which we believe has no place in a pluralistic
democratic society."

OutRage accepts that "abuse of trust" between adults and minors should
be punishable, though "sensitive consideration should be given to
examples of experimentation between those just above and just below a
fixed age of consent".

Activists are determined to remove all discriminatory legislation that
treats homosexual activity as morally different or inferior to
heterosexual liaisons. They even want common law offences of "outraging
public decency" - which in theory should be non-discriminatory -
abolished. As well as equal workplace and tax rights, campaigners also
want same-sex couples to be regarded as next of kin for purposes of
pensions, wills, tax, housing and adoption.

The Government is already considering the extension of the criminal
injuries compensation scheme to pay a homosexual lover up to £10,000
compensation for bereavement after a crime in the same way that a
husband or wife would be paid to recognise the emotional impact of
their loss. The Law Commission has since recommended that homosexuals
should have the right to claim damages if they were financially
dependent on a lover who died through someone else's negligence.

Financial support need not be direct, but could include providing a
home which is lost as a result of the death. At present, only spouses,
other relatives and co-habitees of the opposite sex are entitled. The
law is increasingly moving towards the recognition of rights for same-
sex couples.

Last year the Lords ruled that a homosexual couple in a stable
relationship could be defined as a family. Voluntary agencies and the
state are also signing up to the agenda.