Eddy Merckx Elite

John B. wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:17:44 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 11:36:45 PM UTC-8, wrote:
On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 7:03:14 PM UTC-6, John B. wrote:
Claims a $40,000 income one month and buys second hand junk

John B.

Is that $40k per YEAR, or per MONTH? If its per month, then even in
expensive California that should be enough to get you into the middle
class and allow you to live somewhat comfortably if you watch some of
your pennies. I'm sure $480,000 per year does not go too far in
California, but it should be OK enough. Now, if its $40,000 per year,
then one would have to watch what junk they buy second hand. But even
with a mere $40,000 per year, even in expensive California you should
be able to feed yourself and keep some kind of roof over your head and
buy a used K-Mart bike every year or two.

That is taxable income per year though I'm now not far from making that
per month. But making money and spending money when Biden is in power
wouldn't be very smart now would it. Where it is is inflation safe.
Biden has sent us down the road to super inflation and according to
Frank, that's no problem at all because he doesn't give one **** about
the rest of the world and all of the people in it as long as he can get
along. The normal communist schpeal.

Well yes The Demo's are going to hand out something like 1.9 trillion
to you poor victims of the virus. And it is likely that dumping that
much into the economy will cause some level of inflation.

So what's the solution? Everyone should refuse the (I read) $1,400
that the Government wants to give you?

"Fight Inflation! Don't Take The Money!"

Send it to me. That will move the inflation to Canada - avoiding the
dreaded socialism in your country, while simultaneously weakening your
competitor in the global market. It’s a win-win-win situation.

On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 3:07:03 PM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:36:19 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:17:40 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/11/2021 12:43 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op donderdag 11 maart 2021 om 17:09:32 UTC+1 schreef Frank Krygowski:
On 3/10/2021 9:43 PM, John B. wrote:

Well there is the debate about the gravel and CX bikes but here,
essentially, all the roads, or at least all the roads I see, are
paved. I've been riding 23mm tires since I switched from "sew-ups"..
I think the narrowest tires ever used for more than a short time were
25mm. I've spent most of my road riding time on 28s, some on 32s, a bit
on 35s or 37s when doing loaded touring.

It seems the latest data indicates the super narrow tires have no lower
rolling resistance than similarly constructed wider tires, unless you're
on a surface as smooth as a velodrome track. And wider tires tend to be
less flat prone and more comfortable.

That is a too simple conclusion. I mentioned this earlier:

https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...000-comparison
Well, there are always more details one can consider. Care to summarize
which further details you think need mention?
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for the fool you are.
The first successful heart-lung machine was developed by John H.
Gibbon, Jr. who In 1953, at Jefferson Medical College, Gibbon
connected the circulatory system of an 18-year-old female to a new
machine, stopped the woman’s heart, and for 26 minutes performed
surgery to close a hole in the wall of the heart between the left and
right atria. It was the first successful use of a heart-lung machine
https://www.encyclopedia.com/medicin...t-lung-machine
That was when you were 9 years old.

--
Cheers,

John B.
It is always nice to discover that you can be an expert about things you know nothing about. The first H/L machines would keep a patient alive for bare minutes for reasons that are totally beyond your small brain and invisible understanding. Try looking up "ignorant" and you will find a picture of you. There were np RGA's without which you couldn't get a H/L machine to work properly.

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:36:19 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and
the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make
use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have
a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns
out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for
the fool you are.

I had a triple bypass in 2001 and survived thanks to a heart-lung
machine (cardiopulmonary bypass machine). As I vaguely recall, my
heart was stopped for about 45 mins. Thanks for designing the
heart-lung machine that made it possible for me to be here today. To
insure you receive the proper credit, you really should add the
heart-lung machine and respiratory gas analyzer design accomplishments
to your resume:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-kunich-22012/

Reminder: Change ElectroBioMed Corp details from "XT" to "XP". In
2007-2009, nobody was writing firmware code on an IBM XT machine.




--
Jeff Liebermann
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 10:34:04 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:36:19 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and
the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make
use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have
a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns
out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for
the fool you are.
I had a triple bypass in 2001 and survived thanks to a heart-lung
machine (cardiopulmonary bypass machine). As I vaguely recall, my
heart was stopped for about 45 mins. Thanks for designing the
heart-lung machine that made it possible for me to be here today. To
insure you receive the proper credit, you really should add the
heart-lung machine and respiratory gas analyzer design accomplishments
to your resume:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-kunich-22012/

Reminder: Change ElectroBioMed Corp details from "XT" to "XP". In
2007-2009, nobody was writing firmware code on an IBM XT machine.

Why Jeff? I also don't have the respiratory gas analyzer on my resume either but have a lot of tools around here marked with the "RGA Lab". Do you have some deeling that what is on there is insufficient to prove my expertise? If so, why?

On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 6:36:21 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:17:40 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/11/2021 12:43 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op donderdag 11 maart 2021 om 17:09:32 UTC+1 schreef Frank Krygowski:
On 3/10/2021 9:43 PM, John B. wrote:

Well there is the debate about the gravel and CX bikes but here,
essentially, all the roads, or at least all the roads I see, are
paved. I've been riding 23mm tires since I switched from "sew-ups".
I think the narrowest tires ever used for more than a short time were
25mm. I've spent most of my road riding time on 28s, some on 32s, a bit
on 35s or 37s when doing loaded touring.

It seems the latest data indicates the super narrow tires have no lower
rolling resistance than similarly constructed wider tires, unless you're
on a surface as smooth as a velodrome track. And wider tires tend to be
less flat prone and more comfortable.

That is a too simple conclusion. I mentioned this earlier:

https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...000-comparison
Well, there are always more details one can consider. Care to summarize
which further details you think need mention?
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for the fool you are.

No you did not design the first full-time working heart-lung machine. CBPs have been around for 50 years, and no, not just machines that function for a few minutes. Read this book: https://www.amazon.com/King-Hearts-M.../dp/0609807242 It's a great read -- and you will learn that CBPs capable of use in complex heart surgeries were working reliably in the 1960s -- when you were changing oil on airplanes. Recall Christiaan Barnard? 1967 . . . heart transplant?

If you did anything noteworthy, you would have patents, and from my brief research of the USTPO filings, you don't have even one. I just wrapped up a ride with a guy who has maybe 50. I think he gets a patent every time he folds a piece of paper. Anybody who did what you claim would have patent royalties up the yin-yang or at least inventor credits.

-- Jay Beattie.

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:32:18 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 10:34:04 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:36:19 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and
the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make
use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have
a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns
out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for
the fool you are.

I had a triple bypass in 2001 and survived thanks to a heart-lung
machine (cardiopulmonary bypass machine). As I vaguely recall, my
heart was stopped for about 45 mins. Thanks for designing the
heart-lung machine that made it possible for me to be here today. To
insure you receive the proper credit, you really should add the
heart-lung machine and respiratory gas analyzer design accomplishments
to your resume:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-kunich-22012/

Reminder: Change ElectroBioMed Corp details from "XT" to "XP". In
2007-2009, nobody was writing firmware code on an IBM XT machine.

Why Jeff?

As I noted, to insure that you receive the proper credit for your
work.

I also don't have the respiratory gas analyzer on my resume either

I also mentioned that in the comments. You really should read what I
wrote, or at least verify what you think I may have written.

but have a lot of tools around here marked with the "RGA Lab".

Tools? Is this the "RGA Lab(s)" that is marked on your tools?
http://www.rgalabs.com
http://www.rgalabs.com/RGALabsSummaySheetRev2.pdf

RGA*Labs*is*a*fully*integrated*engineering*company *founded*in*1998*and*
specializing*in*the*power*industry,*including*nucl ear,*transmission,*

and*aerospace*power*systems.**Our*mission*is*to*pr ovide*our*customers*
with*a*group*of*highly*experienced*individuals*cov ering*a*variety*of
* engineering,*scientific,*computing,*and*management *fields.*
(...)
Incorporated*in*1998*(Illinois*S*Corp.)*Headquarte red*in*Barrington

*Hills*(N.W.*of*Chicago,*Il.)*Principals*and*assoc iates*are*predominantly
*from*the*power*generation*industry*with*over*450* years*collective*
experience.**
Power generation? Chicago?

Do
you have some deeling that what is on there is insufficient to prove my
expertise? If so, why?

Sorry, but I don't have a "deeling". However, I understand your
point. All I need to do is inscribe "RGA Lab(s)" on my toolbox
and I too can claim to have invented something of importance.

As for why? Because I don't like liars, and people who don't bother
to substantiate their preposterous claims.

Designing one of the great medical devices of the 20th century would
normally be a great achievement, worthy of international acclaim:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/save-his-dying-sister-law-charles-lindbergh-Invented-medical-device-180956526/
Yet, for some unknown reason, you don't mention it on your resume.
While I appreciate your modesty in not taking credit on your resume
for what I presume would have been a team effort, I would think that
such an achievement would deserve at least a subtle disclosure,
targeting only those who are familiar with the history of the device.

Who Really Invented the Heart/Lung Pump And ECPR?
https://perfusiontheory.com/who-really-invented-the-heartlung-pump-and-ecpr/

Of course, I would expect you to question why I'm offering such
suggestions. I explained this a few months ago. Briefly, I believe
that finding you a full time job will greatly diminish the volume
and/or frequency of your contributions to R.B.T.

Again, thank you for inventing the machine that saved my life in 2002.
You might be interested in the announcement I posted in several Usenet
newsgroups after I escaped from the hospital:
http://members.cruzio.com/~jeffl/crud/surgery.txt


--
Jeff Liebermann
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 2:52:37 PM UTC-8, jbeattie wrote:
On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 6:36:21 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:17:40 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/11/2021 12:43 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op donderdag 11 maart 2021 om 17:09:32 UTC+1 schreef Frank Krygowski:
On 3/10/2021 9:43 PM, John B. wrote:

Well there is the debate about the gravel and CX bikes but here,
essentially, all the roads, or at least all the roads I see, are
paved. I've been riding 23mm tires since I switched from "sew-ups".
I think the narrowest tires ever used for more than a short time were
25mm. I've spent most of my road riding time on 28s, some on 32s, a bit
on 35s or 37s when doing loaded touring.

It seems the latest data indicates the super narrow tires have no lower
rolling resistance than similarly constructed wider tires, unless you're
on a surface as smooth as a velodrome track. And wider tires tend to be
less flat prone and more comfortable.

That is a too simple conclusion. I mentioned this earlier:

https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...000-comparison
Well, there are always more details one can consider. Care to summarize
which further details you think need mention?
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for the fool you are.
No you did not design the first full-time working heart-lung machine. CBPs have been around for 50 years, and no, not just machines that function for a few minutes. Read this book: https://www.amazon.com/King-Hearts-M.../dp/0609807242 It's a great read -- and you will learn that CBPs capable of use in complex heart surgeries were working reliably in the 1960s -- when you were changing oil on airplanes. Recall Christiaan Barnard? 1967 . . . heart transplant?

If you did anything noteworthy, you would have patents, and from my brief research of the USTPO filings, you don't have even one. I just wrapped up a ride with a guy who has maybe 50. I think he gets a patent every time he folds a piece of paper. Anybody who did what you claim would have patent royalties up the yin-yang or at least inventor credits.

Jay, what do you know about heart lung machines, and engineering or the medical facts behind them. I will wait for you to concoct a really good line.

On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 1:41:56 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:32:18 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 10:34:04 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:36:19 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
wrote:
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and
the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make
use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have
a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns
out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for
the fool you are.

I had a triple bypass in 2001 and survived thanks to a heart-lung
machine (cardiopulmonary bypass machine). As I vaguely recall, my
heart was stopped for about 45 mins. Thanks for designing the
heart-lung machine that made it possible for me to be here today. To
insure you receive the proper credit, you really should add the
heart-lung machine and respiratory gas analyzer design accomplishments
to your resume:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-kunich-22012/

Reminder: Change ElectroBioMed Corp details from "XT" to "XP". In
2007-2009, nobody was writing firmware code on an IBM XT machine.

Why Jeff?
As I noted, to insure that you receive the proper credit for your
work.
I also don't have the respiratory gas analyzer on my resume either
I also mentioned that in the comments. You really should read what I
wrote, or at least verify what you think I may have written.
but have a lot of tools around here marked with the "RGA Lab".
Tools? Is this the "RGA Lab(s)" that is marked on your tools?
http://www.rgalabs.com
http://www.rgalabs.com/RGALabsSummaySheetRev2.pdf

RGAáLabsáisáaáfullyáintegratedáengineeringá companyáfoundedáiná1998áandá
specializingáinátheápoweráindustry,áincluding ánuclear,átransmission,á

andáaerospaceápowerásystems.ááOurámissionái sátoáprovideáourácustomersá
witháaágroupáofáhighlyáexperiencedáindividua lsácoveringáaávarietyáof
á engineering,áscientific,ácomputing,áandámanage mentáfields.á
(...)
Incorporatedáiná1998á(IllinoisáSáCorp.)áHead quarteredáináBarrington

áHillsá(N.W.áofáChicago,áIl.)áPrincipalsáan dáassociatesáareápredominantly
áfromátheápowerágenerationáindustryáwitháov erá450áyearsácollectiveá
experience.áá
Power generation? Chicago?
Do
you have some deeling that what is on there is insufficient to prove my
expertise? If so, why?
Sorry, but I don't have a "deeling". However, I understand your
point. All I need to do is inscribe "RGA Lab(s)" on my toolbox
and I too can claim to have invented something of importance.

As for why? Because I don't like liars, and people who don't bother
to substantiate their preposterous claims.

Designing one of the great medical devices of the 20th century would
normally be a great achievement, worthy of international acclaim:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/save-his-dying-sister-law-charles-lindbergh-Invented-medical-device-180956526/
Yet, for some unknown reason, you don't mention it on your resume.
While I appreciate your modesty in not taking credit on your resume
for what I presume would have been a team effort, I would think that
such an achievement would deserve at least a subtle disclosure,
targeting only those who are familiar with the history of the device.

Who Really Invented the Heart/Lung Pump And ECPR?
https://perfusiontheory.com/who-really-invented-the-heartlung-pump-and-ecpr/

Of course, I would expect you to question why I'm offering such
suggestions. I explained this a few months ago. Briefly, I believe
that finding you a full time job will greatly diminish the volume
and/or frequency of your contributions to R.B.T.

Again, thank you for inventing the machine that saved my life in 2002.
You might be interested in the announcement I posted in several Usenet
newsgroups after I escaped from the hospital:
http://members.cruzio.com/~jeffl/crud/surgery.txt

No Jeff, that is NOT the RGA lab that is marked on my tools. Perhaps that is a company that bought up the RGA from whatever company I developed the digital portion at. The company had to have gone broke since I'm not in the habit of robbing tools from companies where I work. I have a vague recollection of the VP telling us that we could take anything we liked.

Maybe you can be as boorish as Jay and say that if I ever did any of these things that I should have patents on them all. Of course I'm sure that you patented your work on the radios you made for Granger. Why you must be a multimillionaire for your work as an engineer right?

On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 9:09:25 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 2:52:37 PM UTC-8, jbeattie wrote:
On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 6:36:21 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:17:40 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/11/2021 12:43 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op donderdag 11 maart 2021 om 17:09:32 UTC+1 schreef Frank Krygowski:
On 3/10/2021 9:43 PM, John B. wrote:

Well there is the debate about the gravel and CX bikes but here,
essentially, all the roads, or at least all the roads I see, are
paved. I've been riding 23mm tires since I switched from "sew-ups".
I think the narrowest tires ever used for more than a short time were
25mm. I've spent most of my road riding time on 28s, some on 32s, a bit
on 35s or 37s when doing loaded touring.

It seems the latest data indicates the super narrow tires have no lower
rolling resistance than similarly constructed wider tires, unless you're
on a surface as smooth as a velodrome track. And wider tires tend to be
less flat prone and more comfortable.

That is a too simple conclusion. I mentioned this earlier:

https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...000-comparison
Well, there are always more details one can consider. Care to summarize
which further details you think need mention?
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for the fool you are.
No you did not design the first full-time working heart-lung machine. CBPs have been around for 50 years, and no, not just machines that function for a few minutes. Read this book: https://www.amazon.com/King-Hearts-M.../dp/0609807242 It's a great read -- and you will learn that CBPs capable of use in complex heart surgeries were working reliably in the 1960s -- when you were changing oil on airplanes. Recall Christiaan Barnard? 1967 . . . heart transplant?

If you did anything noteworthy, you would have patents, and from my brief research of the USTPO filings, you don't have even one. I just wrapped up a ride with a guy who has maybe 50. I think he gets a patent every time he folds a piece of paper. Anybody who did what you claim would have patent royalties up the yin-yang or at least inventor credits.
Jay, what do you know about heart lung machines, and engineering or the medical facts behind them. I will wait for you to concoct a really good line..

Tom, answer the question. How did you design a machine that was in regular use since the 1960s? Did you develop a new iteration, like one with casters on it? Your pomposity is staggering and yet you can point to nothing with your name on it. Even my dad had patents, and he was just tinkering in the garage after his day job as a pharmacist and chemist. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2792247 I mean really. If you developed anything noteworthy, you would have an inventor credit. There is no corroboration whatsoever of any of your claims apart from your own statements. How are we to judge the truth of anything you say?

-- Jay Beattie.

On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 9:30:23 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 9:09:25 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 2:52:37 PM UTC-8, jbeattie wrote:
On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 6:36:21 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:17:40 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/11/2021 12:43 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op donderdag 11 maart 2021 om 17:09:32 UTC+1 schreef Frank Krygowski:
On 3/10/2021 9:43 PM, John B. wrote:

Well there is the debate about the gravel and CX bikes but here,
essentially, all the roads, or at least all the roads I see, are
paved. I've been riding 23mm tires since I switched from "sew-ups".
I think the narrowest tires ever used for more than a short time were
25mm. I've spent most of my road riding time on 28s, some on 32s, a bit
on 35s or 37s when doing loaded touring.

It seems the latest data indicates the super narrow tires have no lower
rolling resistance than similarly constructed wider tires, unless you're
on a surface as smooth as a velodrome track. And wider tires tend to be
less flat prone and more comfortable.

That is a too simple conclusion. I mentioned this earlier:

https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...000-comparison
Well, there are always more details one can consider. Care to summarize
which further details you think need mention?
Well. I designed the first full time working heart-lung machine and the respiratory gas analyzer both of which you will no doubt make use of in the very near future. From you comments you nearly have a heart attack when you make your unfounded assertions and it turns out that I have wide experience in those fields and can see you for the fool you are.
No you did not design the first full-time working heart-lung machine. CBPs have been around for 50 years, and no, not just machines that function for a few minutes. Read this book: https://www.amazon.com/King-Hearts-M.../dp/0609807242 It's a great read -- and you will learn that CBPs capable of use in complex heart surgeries were working reliably in the 1960s -- when you were changing oil on airplanes. Recall Christiaan Barnard? 1967 . . . heart transplant?

If you did anything noteworthy, you would have patents, and from my brief research of the USTPO filings, you don't have even one. I just wrapped up a ride with a guy who has maybe 50. I think he gets a patent every time he folds a piece of paper. Anybody who did what you claim would have patent royalties up the yin-yang or at least inventor credits.
Jay, what do you know about heart lung machines, and engineering or the medical facts behind them. I will wait for you to concoct a really good line.
Tom, answer the question. How did you design a machine that was in regular use since the 1960s? Did you develop a new iteration, like one with casters on it? Your pomposity is staggering and yet you can point to nothing with your name on it. Even my dad had patents, and he was just tinkering in the garage after his day job as a pharmacist and chemist. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2792247 I mean really. If you developed anything noteworthy, you would have an inventor credit. There is no corroboration whatsoever of any of your claims apart from your own statements. How are we to judge the truth of anything you say?

Jay, because they WEREN'T in regular use. They were constant flow devices and not cardiac-like pumps. They were only good for bare minutes because unless you pump in the heart-like rhythm and pressure the entire venous system rapidly fails. Now explain to me what you know about medical instrumentation. The device I did the digital design and programming on could be used not just for hours but days.