|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
On Jan 5, 5:50*am, Duane Hébert wrote:
On 1/4/2011 6:15 PM, wrote: Jean who? wrote: I'm looking to replace my old road bike with a carbon fiber model. My criteria a women's specific design, comfy for all day riding, smooth riding, light weight, Shimano 105 components, and preferably with three chainwheels. Via the web, I've checked out the specs and reviews for following bikes: Cannondale (Synapse Fem 5), Felt (ZW5), Giant (Avail Advanced 2), Trek (Madrone 3.1WSD), or Specialized (Ruby Elite Apex). *I was hoping y'all might have some insights into these bikes so that I could minimize driving all over the state (there are no local dealers for most of these) to do the final fit check-out and test ride. *I don't know how comfort is specified on a web page. So here goes. *Assuming equally good fit and tire size/psi - Do any of these bikes stand out as more smooth riding? *Do any of these bikes stand out as more comfy for all day long cruising? *Does anyone have any idea how the weights compare for the same size bike? Thanks for any help trying to trim down my list of potential bikes. NO! *The comfort of a bicycle resides in its wheelbase and tires; frames and wheels having practically no perceptible elasticity. Therefore, test ride the bike and see if it fits your body: bars, pedals, and saddle. *You can't ask for more. *If you chose a suspension bicycle, you'll get speed instabilities that you won't like. *Get large enough tires 28-30mm cross section and brakes that you like. *That's where it's at! Are you saying that all other things being equal, a bike with a CF frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? *That a steel frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? *Or am I misunderstanding you?- Hide quoted text - Assuming the same geometry, equipment, tires, etc., then yes, that is what he is saying. Frame materials are inelastic in the vertical plane (unless you have a suspension frame). Your seat tube does not compress and extend. Your rear stays are part of a triangulated structure. Frame materials do have more or less ability to transmit vibration, however. That is the the argument as I understand it. -- Jay Beattie. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
On 1/5/2011 10:42 AM, Jay Beattie wrote:
On Jan 5, 5:50 am, Duane wrote: On 1/4/2011 6:15 PM, wrote: Jean who? wrote: I'm looking to replace my old road bike with a carbon fiber model. My criteria a women's specific design, comfy for all day riding, smooth riding, light weight, Shimano 105 components, and preferably with three chainwheels. Via the web, I've checked out the specs and reviews for following bikes: Cannondale (Synapse Fem 5), Felt (ZW5), Giant (Avail Advanced 2), Trek (Madrone 3.1WSD), or Specialized (Ruby Elite Apex). I was hoping y'all might have some insights into these bikes so that I could minimize driving all over the state (there are no local dealers for most of these) to do the final fit check-out and test ride. I don't know how comfort is specified on a web page. So here goes. Assuming equally good fit and tire size/psi - Do any of these bikes stand out as more smooth riding? Do any of these bikes stand out as more comfy for all day long cruising? Does anyone have any idea how the weights compare for the same size bike? Thanks for any help trying to trim down my list of potential bikes. NO! The comfort of a bicycle resides in its wheelbase and tires; frames and wheels having practically no perceptible elasticity. Therefore, test ride the bike and see if it fits your body: bars, pedals, and saddle. You can't ask for more. If you chose a suspension bicycle, you'll get speed instabilities that you won't like. Get large enough tires 28-30mm cross section and brakes that you like. That's where it's at! Are you saying that all other things being equal, a bike with a CF frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? That a steel frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? Or am I misunderstanding you?- Hide quoted text - Assuming the same geometry, equipment, tires, etc., then yes, that is what he is saying. Frame materials are inelastic in the vertical plane (unless you have a suspension frame). Your seat tube does not compress and extend. Your rear stays are part of a triangulated structure. Frame materials do have more or less ability to transmit vibration, however. That is the the argument as I understand it. -- I think that my steel frame is a "softer" ride than the last aluminum frame that I had and I think that the CF frame absorbs a lot of the road noise that the aluminum one didn't although less than the steel one does. Am I just imagining that? Maybe, I mean the CF frame is a tight road bike with a short wheel base and the steel one is a sport tour style with a longer wheelbase. But the frame has to be capable of dampening road vibration doesn't it? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
On Jan 5, 12:43*pm, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op 5-1-2011 14:50, Duane Hébert schreef: On 1/4/2011 6:15 PM, wrote: Jean who? wrote: I'm looking to replace my old road bike with a carbon fiber model. My criteria a women's specific design, comfy for all day riding, smooth riding, light weight, Shimano 105 components, and preferably with three chainwheels. Via the web, I've checked out the specs and reviews for following bikes: Cannondale (Synapse Fem 5), Felt (ZW5), Giant (Avail Advanced 2), Trek (Madrone 3.1WSD), or Specialized (Ruby Elite Apex). I was hoping y'all might have some insights into these bikes so that I could minimize driving all over the state (there are no local dealers for most of these) to do the final fit check-out and test ride. I don't know how comfort is specified on a web page. So here goes. Assuming equally good fit and tire size/psi - Do any of these bikes stand out as more smooth riding? Do any of these bikes stand out as more comfy for all day long cruising? Does anyone have any idea how the weights compare for the same size bike? Thanks for any help trying to trim down my list of potential bikes. NO! The comfort of a bicycle resides in its wheelbase and tires; frames and wheels having practically no perceptible elasticity. Therefore, test ride the bike and see if it fits your body: bars, pedals, and saddle. You can't ask for more. If you chose a suspension bicycle, you'll get speed instabilities that you won't like. Get large enough tires 28-30mm cross section and brakes that you like. That's where it's at! Are you saying that all other things being equal, a bike with a CF frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? That a steel frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? Or am I misunderstanding you? A steel frame can be harsher than a aluminum frame. An aluminum frame can be more comfortable than a CF frame. It is not in the material itself it is how it is used and even then saddle, wheels, fit, fitness, tires, handlebar make much much more difference. Choosing a frame material for its so called comfort properties is stupid. If have a AL, Ti and a CF roadbike and I really can't feel any difference. Al harsch and steel plush is something the 'I am a lugged steel frame guy' want you to believe. It's what every single one of my friends believe, especially when on a sales floor. That said, steel is pretty nice for a bike that you're gonna wreck, like a hard tail mtb, as you can repair it more easily. I'm of the school that Taiwan and China have got it down when it comes to mass produced frames, they're commodities, not worth sweating about. I'll have my buddy A. build me a bike next year probably--but more as a way to support a cool guy, and to have a piece of art. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
On 1/5/2011 1:43 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op 5-1-2011 14:50, Duane Hébert schreef: On 1/4/2011 6:15 PM, wrote: Jean who? wrote: I'm looking to replace my old road bike with a carbon fiber model. My criteria a women's specific design, comfy for all day riding, smooth riding, light weight, Shimano 105 components, and preferably with three chainwheels. Via the web, I've checked out the specs and reviews for following bikes: Cannondale (Synapse Fem 5), Felt (ZW5), Giant (Avail Advanced 2), Trek (Madrone 3.1WSD), or Specialized (Ruby Elite Apex). I was hoping y'all might have some insights into these bikes so that I could minimize driving all over the state (there are no local dealers for most of these) to do the final fit check-out and test ride. I don't know how comfort is specified on a web page. So here goes. Assuming equally good fit and tire size/psi - Do any of these bikes stand out as more smooth riding? Do any of these bikes stand out as more comfy for all day long cruising? Does anyone have any idea how the weights compare for the same size bike? Thanks for any help trying to trim down my list of potential bikes. NO! The comfort of a bicycle resides in its wheelbase and tires; frames and wheels having practically no perceptible elasticity. Therefore, test ride the bike and see if it fits your body: bars, pedals, and saddle. You can't ask for more. If you chose a suspension bicycle, you'll get speed instabilities that you won't like. Get large enough tires 28-30mm cross section and brakes that you like. That's where it's at! Are you saying that all other things being equal, a bike with a CF frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? That a steel frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? Or am I misunderstanding you? A steel frame can be harsher than a aluminum frame. An aluminum frame can be more comfortable than a CF frame. It is not in the material itself it is how it is used and even then saddle, wheels, fit, fitness, tires, handlebar make much much more difference. Choosing a frame material for its so called comfort properties is stupid. If have a AL, Ti and a CF roadbike and I really can't feel any difference. Al harsch and steel plush is something the 'I am a lugged steel frame guy' want you to believe. But I'm pretty much a lugged steel frame guy that also has a CF. Both of my current bikes are more comfortable than my last aluminum one. The CF one tends to have less road vibration and the steel one seems more comfortable WRT bumps. I'm pretty happy with both. I'm riding the road bike more these days as it handles better and just seems more fun to ride. I've read http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html I know that there are a lot of differences beside the frames. But I thought that all other things being equal, the stiffness or damping characteristics would be different. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
Op 5-1-2011 19:53, Duane Hébert schreef:
On 1/5/2011 1:43 PM, Lou Holtman wrote: Op 5-1-2011 14:50, Duane Hébert schreef: On 1/4/2011 6:15 PM, wrote: Jean who? wrote: I'm looking to replace my old road bike with a carbon fiber model. My criteria a women's specific design, comfy for all day riding, smooth riding, light weight, Shimano 105 components, and preferably with three chainwheels. Via the web, I've checked out the specs and reviews for following bikes: Cannondale (Synapse Fem 5), Felt (ZW5), Giant (Avail Advanced 2), Trek (Madrone 3.1WSD), or Specialized (Ruby Elite Apex). I was hoping y'all might have some insights into these bikes so that I could minimize driving all over the state (there are no local dealers for most of these) to do the final fit check-out and test ride. I don't know how comfort is specified on a web page. So here goes. Assuming equally good fit and tire size/psi - Do any of these bikes stand out as more smooth riding? Do any of these bikes stand out as more comfy for all day long cruising? Does anyone have any idea how the weights compare for the same size bike? Thanks for any help trying to trim down my list of potential bikes. NO! The comfort of a bicycle resides in its wheelbase and tires; frames and wheels having practically no perceptible elasticity. Therefore, test ride the bike and see if it fits your body: bars, pedals, and saddle. You can't ask for more. If you chose a suspension bicycle, you'll get speed instabilities that you won't like. Get large enough tires 28-30mm cross section and brakes that you like. That's where it's at! Are you saying that all other things being equal, a bike with a CF frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? That a steel frame is not more comfortable than an aluminum frame? Or am I misunderstanding you? A steel frame can be harsher than a aluminum frame. An aluminum frame can be more comfortable than a CF frame. It is not in the material itself it is how it is used and even then saddle, wheels, fit, fitness, tires, handlebar make much much more difference. Choosing a frame material for its so called comfort properties is stupid. If have a AL, Ti and a CF roadbike and I really can't feel any difference. Al harsch and steel plush is something the 'I am a lugged steel frame guy' want you to believe. But I'm pretty much a lugged steel frame guy that also has a CF. Both of my current bikes are more comfortable than my last aluminum one. The CF one tends to have less road vibration and the steel one seems more comfortable WRT bumps. I'm pretty happy with both. I'm riding the road bike more these days as it handles better and just seems more fun to ride. I've read http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html I know that there are a lot of differences beside the frames. But I thought that all other things being equal, the stiffness or damping characteristics would be different. Steel is 3 times stiffer than aluminum and 2 times stiffer than Ti if you just look at the material properties. How about that. Things are never equal. You just compared two bikes/frames. Lou |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
On 1/5/2011 10:53 AM, Duane Hébert wrote:
But I'm pretty much a lugged steel frame guy that also has a CF. Both of my current bikes are more comfortable than my last aluminum one. The CF one tends to have less road vibration and the steel one seems more comfortable WRT bumps. I'm pretty happy with both. I'm riding the road bike more these days as it handles better and just seems more fun to ride. I've read http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html I know that there are a lot of differences beside the frames. But I thought that all other things being equal, the stiffness or damping characteristics would be different. I'm just waiting for CF to filter down to the el-cheapo bikes, like what happened with aluminum. AL started off with Cannondale and Vitus, who were able to convince people that a less expensive material was worth paying a premium for. It worked out well for quite a while, until the ROW realized the cost advantages of aluminum, and eventually Cannondale went into bankruptcy. CF, manufactured in volume could be cost competitive with aluminum. There's still a Cannondale dealer near me, and it's amusing to see their banner proclaiming that Cannondale bicycles are made in the U.S., when the current owner of Cannondale moved all production to Asia. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
On Jan 5, 1:15*pm, SMS wrote:
On 1/5/2011 10:53 AM, Duane H bert wrote: But I'm pretty much a lugged steel frame guy that also has a CF. Both of my current bikes are more comfortable than my last aluminum one. The CF one tends to have less road vibration and the steel one seems more comfortable WRT bumps. I'm pretty happy with both. I'm riding the road bike more these days as it handles better and just seems more fun to ride. I've readhttp://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html I know that there are a lot of differences beside the frames. But I thought that all other things being equal, the stiffness or damping characteristics would be different. I'm just waiting for CF to filter down to the el-cheapo bikes, like what happened with aluminum. AL started off with Cannondale and Vitus, who were able to convince people that a less expensive material was worth paying a premium for. Evidence for this, or simply lying again, Scharf? You make the claim that aluminum is less expensive, and that two of the big 80s manufacturers had some kind of price gouging conspiracy going. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes?
On 1/5/2011 11:18 AM, landotter wrote:
Evidence for this, or simply lying again, Scharf? You make the claim that aluminum is less expensive, and that two of the big 80s manufacturers had some kind of price gouging conspiracy going. Listen to Sheldon's speech. Or attend the Taipei International Bicycle show and compare prices of different frames. I've done both. http://sheldonbrown.com/podcasts/sheldon-bentride2005.mp3 8:50. And remember the $8 was for an aluminum frame from Taiwan, not from China. Is there anyone that believes that aluminum frames are not less expensive than Cro-Mo steel frames?! There was no conspiracy by Vitus and/or Cannondale, just a brilliant realization that there was a way to sell a product that cost less to manufacture for more money than the product that cost more to manufacture. No one forced anyone to buy those products. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes? | Jean | Techniques | 234 | January 18th 11 11:15 AM |
Tips on carbon fiber WSD bikes? | Tºm Shermªn™ °_°[_2_] | Techniques | 0 | January 5th 11 05:52 AM |
Carbon fiber bikes | Chris Zacho The Wheelman | General | 6 | September 21st 05 12:01 PM |
Where are the old Carbon Fiber bikes? | Never Enough Money | General | 11 | September 16th 05 02:46 AM |