|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
Absolutely redonkulous:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... -b- |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
On Jan 4, 11:33*am, bar wrote:
Absolutely redonkulous: *http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... -b- If they replaced the black bits w/ a dark chocolate brown, it would be quite stylish and trendy. If they just added a bit of argyle, it would be da' bomb! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
On Jan 4, 1:33*pm, bar wrote:
Absolutely redonkulous: *http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... -b- i think it looks good. just maybe too rapha-ish |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
On Jan 4, 1:33*pm, bar wrote:
Absolutely redonkulous: *http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... -b- and the jaguar team cars are cool. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
bar wrote:
Absolutely redonkulous: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... -b- Well, I'm an advocate of simple kit designs so I'd beg to differ that it's worse than The Shack's. I like the black shorts with no colored side panel. If I were a sponsor I would like how the eye is drawn to the Sky logo, how easy it is to pick out due to the lack of competing visual elements. I will also note that the Sky shorts are more discrete on rainy days than those of many other teams. This is a flaw that too many kit designers commit, and if I could slap them for it you can bet I would. Bob Schwartz |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
On Jan 4, 2:47*pm, Bob Schwartz
wrote: bar wrote: Absolutely redonkulous: *http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... -b- Well, I'm an advocate of simple kit designs so I'd beg to differ that it's worse than The Shack's. I like the black shorts with no colored side panel. If I were a sponsor I would like how the eye is drawn to the Sky logo, how easy it is to pick out due to the lack of competing visual elements. I will also note that the Sky shorts are more discrete on rainy days than those of many other teams. This is a flaw that too many kit designers commit, and if I could slap them for it you can bet I would. Bob Schwartz quik step's 'retro' kit for 2010 also seems to have all black shorts: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...for-2010/99735 i guess only the cool teams got the black shorts memo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
bar wrote:
On Jan 4, 2:47 pm, Bob Schwartz wrote: bar wrote: Absolutely redonkulous: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... -b- Well, I'm an advocate of simple kit designs so I'd beg to differ that it's worse than The Shack's. I like the black shorts with no colored side panel. If I were a sponsor I would like how the eye is drawn to the Sky logo, how easy it is to pick out due to the lack of competing visual elements. I will also note that the Sky shorts are more discrete on rainy days than those of many other teams. This is a flaw that too many kit designers commit, and if I could slap them for it you can bet I would. Bob Schwartz quik step's 'retro' kit for 2010 also seems to have all black shorts: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...for-2010/99735 i guess only the cool teams got the black shorts memo Like Sky they feature an uncomplicated design with little visual competition for the primary sponsor's logo. They've got a blue side panel on the shorts: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...for-2010/99734 So it isn't entirely retro. Bob Schwartz |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
In article
, bar wrote: Absolutely redonkulous: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/phot...n-london/99947 You know it's ****e when it something actually make The Shack's kit look good in comparison ... How do they think of these things? They properly make the shorts black, and then photograph them with grazing incidence light showing off the team's packages. -- Michael Press |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
"Gee....I don't understand why all of our riders keep suffering from
dehydration and heat exhaustion???" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
new Sky kit is off the hook!
Op 05-01-10 1:10, Anton Berlin wrote:
"Gee....I don't understand why all of our riders keep suffering from dehydration and heat exhaustion???" The back is white. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Left Hook | Tim Woodall | UK | 10 | October 3rd 07 08:40 AM |
Why is Ullrich still on the hook? | Dumbass | Racing | 22 | November 17th 06 11:36 AM |
Floyd can't be let off the hook because... | Joe King | Racing | 23 | August 14th 06 08:31 PM |
right hook | lokey | General | 42 | June 6th 05 09:41 AM |
Do you have the hook? | [email protected] | General | 2 | January 21st 05 02:56 AM |