|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
More infra promoters
On 8/5/2016 3:54 AM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:34:02 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 8/2/2016 11:56 AM, Radey Shouman wrote: Frank Krygowski writes: On 8/1/2016 10:34 PM, Radey Shouman wrote: jbeattie writes: We citizens have decided through our republican representatives that cops should be given some slack when it comes to killing people. Now, cops don't get a free pass -- they can't kill people willy-nilly with ball-point pens like Jason Bourne or any character played by Liam Neeson. They must follow the law and only kill according to the rules. It's all about the rules. What prevents them? Rules are great, enforcing them against the enforcers is hard, and getting harder all the time. Is there evidence that unjustified killings by cops has increased in the past 50 years or so? I'm not sure where you would find it. If you follow the Wikipedia link that Mr. Beattie provided you'll see that US law enforcement has resisted collecting statistics on the use of excessive force, although legally required to do so. My own intuition is that policing has always been a rough business, and that the recent media interest is mostly due to the availability of video. Related: I'm pretty sure that the number of handguns in civilian possession has increased. Many of those are in the possession of rather unsavory characters, the kind police are forced to deal with. Would that perhaps have an effect on the counts of people shot by police? I am afraid you are mistaken. Police may complain that they are "outgunned", but there is little evidence of that. Most criminals, even if armed to the teeth, would much rather be arrested than shot. You might check out the following link: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoy...s-edition.html http://goo.gl/EAJHqd for some nice statistics and graphs on firearm-related police deaths in the US. Those deaths have been falling consistently since the mid-seventies. That's good, but I was thinking of a different cause-effect chain. If (say) the people pulled over by cops for certain offenses are more likely to be carrying handguns (or are even perceived by cops to be more likely to be carrying handguns) it seems to me that cops would be on higher alert, so to speak. They'd be more likely to mistrust a person who refused to show his hands, or who reached into his clothes or under his seat. As I thank I have mentioned, I knew a Maine State Policeman pretty well and he was telling me about two instances that happened on the Maine State Toll Road. In one case the guy in the auto jumped out, knocked the cop on his butt, stole his gun and left him handcuffed to a tree on the side of the road. In the second case the cop walked up to the car and the guy in the car shot him and killed him. I was told this as part of en explanation why I could expect a bit more "formal" treatment from the State Police in the future. That could both lead to more shootings of people who were unarmed, and to shooting of people who actually were reaching for a weapon. In the latter case, it would probably help reduce the number of cops killed while on duty. In the current climate, with well-publicized ambushes of police occasionally popping up, I imagine a great many cops are very worried. Some will be on hair trigger, so to speak. And even though we'd like them to be perfect, I can understand their emotions. For us non-criminals, the usual protocol for a traffic stop is window open (regardless of weather), interior lights on, hands splayed at top of steering wheel and license between fingers. Whatever is charged can be adjudicated later, but provoking a cop on the side of the road is inadvisable. Police are not attacked every day, but those stories are uppermost in his mind when he walks toward your car. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
Ads |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
More infra promoters
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 07:43:23 -0500, AMuzi wrote:
On 8/5/2016 3:54 AM, John B. wrote: On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:34:02 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 8/2/2016 11:56 AM, Radey Shouman wrote: Frank Krygowski writes: On 8/1/2016 10:34 PM, Radey Shouman wrote: jbeattie writes: We citizens have decided through our republican representatives that cops should be given some slack when it comes to killing people. Now, cops don't get a free pass -- they can't kill people willy-nilly with ball-point pens like Jason Bourne or any character played by Liam Neeson. They must follow the law and only kill according to the rules. It's all about the rules. What prevents them? Rules are great, enforcing them against the enforcers is hard, and getting harder all the time. Is there evidence that unjustified killings by cops has increased in the past 50 years or so? I'm not sure where you would find it. If you follow the Wikipedia link that Mr. Beattie provided you'll see that US law enforcement has resisted collecting statistics on the use of excessive force, although legally required to do so. My own intuition is that policing has always been a rough business, and that the recent media interest is mostly due to the availability of video. Related: I'm pretty sure that the number of handguns in civilian possession has increased. Many of those are in the possession of rather unsavory characters, the kind police are forced to deal with. Would that perhaps have an effect on the counts of people shot by police? I am afraid you are mistaken. Police may complain that they are "outgunned", but there is little evidence of that. Most criminals, even if armed to the teeth, would much rather be arrested than shot. You might check out the following link: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoy...s-edition.html http://goo.gl/EAJHqd for some nice statistics and graphs on firearm-related police deaths in the US. Those deaths have been falling consistently since the mid-seventies. That's good, but I was thinking of a different cause-effect chain. If (say) the people pulled over by cops for certain offenses are more likely to be carrying handguns (or are even perceived by cops to be more likely to be carrying handguns) it seems to me that cops would be on higher alert, so to speak. They'd be more likely to mistrust a person who refused to show his hands, or who reached into his clothes or under his seat. As I thank I have mentioned, I knew a Maine State Policeman pretty well and he was telling me about two instances that happened on the Maine State Toll Road. In one case the guy in the auto jumped out, knocked the cop on his butt, stole his gun and left him handcuffed to a tree on the side of the road. In the second case the cop walked up to the car and the guy in the car shot him and killed him. I was told this as part of en explanation why I could expect a bit more "formal" treatment from the State Police in the future. That could both lead to more shootings of people who were unarmed, and to shooting of people who actually were reaching for a weapon. In the latter case, it would probably help reduce the number of cops killed while on duty. In the current climate, with well-publicized ambushes of police occasionally popping up, I imagine a great many cops are very worried. Some will be on hair trigger, so to speak. And even though we'd like them to be perfect, I can understand their emotions. For us non-criminals, the usual protocol for a traffic stop is window open (regardless of weather), interior lights on, hands splayed at top of steering wheel and license between fingers. Whatever is charged can be adjudicated later, but provoking a cop on the side of the road is inadvisable. Police are not attacked every day, but those stories are uppermost in his mind when he walks toward your car. Years ago I was stopped by a cop. I was in the Air Force, going home on leave and was at the end of a long line of cars traveling at less than the speed limit. Passed a State Trooper and as I went past the lights came on, and he roared out in pursuit. I pulled over and he stopped behind me. When he got out he was in the sort of blind spot behind and to the left side of my car and when he came into my view he had this humongous great cannon pointed at me. HANDS ON THE WHEEL! DON'T MOVE! He pulled the door open, KEEP YOUR HANDS UP, OUT OF THE CAR. UP AGAINST THE CAR! As he was patting me down he must have seen my uniforms hanging in the back of the car and asked if I was in the service and when I said I was he asked what I was doing and when I told him I was going home on leave he asked to see my leave orders and when I showed him the orders he put the gun away and told me I could go. Well, with the gun in the holster I got real brave and asked him what he was doing with all this gun waving and all that and he told me that about 20 minutes earlier some guy driving a green car had robbed a convenience store "down the road" and shot two people. And, of course, my car was green. I really cannot remember what my immediate feelings were, relief I suppose, but in retrospect I do not believe he acted improperly. -- cheers, John B. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
More infra promoters
On 08-05-2016 03:47, John B. wrote:
something like 11 years of New York police static tics. And I am able I hope no static tics with a gun in hand. :-) Damn auto-correct! -- Wes Groleau |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lazy promoters? | [email protected] | Racing | 21 | August 26th 06 08:26 PM |
proving tdg promoters right? | Alec Sander | Racing | 6 | April 25th 05 05:13 AM |
Any race promoters in attendance? | Carla A-G | Mountain Biking | 11 | August 28th 03 11:57 AM |