A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Social Issues
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ARBR - RIP



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 21st 08, 01:02 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
JimmyMac
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,754
Default ARBR - RIP

On Feb 20, 2:45 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...



On Feb 19, 6:38 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message


...


On Feb 16, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message


...


On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]
ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed
Gin.
Jim
McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal
feud
with
the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.


If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
believable. Don't insult our intelligence by ****ing over our
shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.


All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed Gin in the
Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
[...]


I never denied that I had a [an] ongoing feud with the man, but I deny
that
I brought the feud to ARBR and until you can offer proof of your
statement that I did, I contend that you are a liar, plain and
simple.


Contend all you want. It takes two to tango you know.


Like I said, I never denied feuding with the man, but feuding and
"bring" the feud to ARBR are not one an then same and I still
anxiously await your proof to substantiate your outrageous assertion
that I did. It appears you are having more trouble baking up your lie
thatn you did lying in the first place.


All you had to do was tell him to go **** himself, but you were too stupid
to know enough to do that.


Sure I could have, but stupidity isn't what prevented me from doing
that. I simply chose not to stoop to his and your level. Why is this
simple notion so difficult for the "great one" to comprehend? My
unwillingness to do as you do is not an indication that I am stupid.
It is an indication that I am more of a gentleman. YOu seem no to
understand that It is not within you purview for you to determine or
dictate what is appropriate for me to do or not do.

In fact through cross posting Ed [he means Ed Gin, not Ed Dolan] spread
our
feud across


several newsgroups and even ported it over to a moderated forum where
he was suspended from posting, but I repeat I have put the man behind
me and move on and you cannot. You accuse me of covering the same old
ground and not moving on and I have repeatedly requested you to
refrain from covering the same old ground and requested you to move
on. I am able to do so, You are not and therein lies the difference
between us. The only time I mention Ed Gin is to request you to stop
talking about the man, but you cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara


Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR as a viable
newsgroup. You played a subsidiary role by accommodating the wretch. All
I
ever did was swear a blue streak at him, but you tried to reason with
him,
thereby prolonging the whole ungodly mess.


I tend to try to reason with someone rather than swear at them because
thats what a reasonable, rationale person does. I don't expect you to
understand that.


But you KNEW what kind of person he was!


Over time yes, and when I realized what ad who he was, the feud
commenced, but I have since put the man behind me and moved on. For
some peculiar reason you cannot do the same. I have no compulsion to
mention his name in this forum except to request that you refrain from
doing so. Everyone has heard it umteen guzilliion times before. You
can stop now or have you no self-control?

You can reason with me because I am
not a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. You seem to have no sense of
people.


No one can reason with someone as unreasonable as you. One who has no
social contact with people can't possibly have anything but a warped
and jaded perspective concerning another's sense of people.

I do not wonder that you do not like the subject brought up, but ARBR is
what it is today because of Ed Gin - and you cannot escape your
responsibility for it either, at least not as long as I am here to remind
everyone of what happened.


You should have been a historical revisionist. Your twisted spin on
things I take at face value (read worthless) and I am not the least
bit troubled, but I remind you that I've put all this behind me. You
live in the past and rehash the past ad nauseum. You are incapable of
putting the past behind you. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot
make a post without once again recycling time worn, regurgitated crap
that we have all hear countless times before. Repetition is you
middle name.


An easy solution is for you to stop stalking me. After all, the only
association I have with you is over the Ed Gin episode.


If I were to be gone tomorrow, you would continue to rave and rant
about Ed Gin ... the criminal vandal troll that destroyed ARBR, so
there is no reason to pretend otherwise. Nor should you blame your
association with me as an excuse for recounting the Ed GIn Episode
over and over again. Man you really need to get a grip. Either that
or the nurse should pry your hands off the keyboard an put you back in
your straight-jacket.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


Ads
  #12  
Old February 21st 08, 03:22 PM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,212
Default ARBR - RIP


"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Feb 20, 2:45 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:

[...]
All you had to do was tell him to go **** himself, but you were too
stupid
to know enough to do that.


Sure I could have, but stupidity isn't what prevented me from doing
that. I simply chose not to stoop to his and your level. Why is this
simple notion so difficult for the "great one" to comprehend? My
unwillingness to do as you do is not an indication that I am stupid.
It is an indication that I am more of a gentleman. YOu seem no to
understand that It is not within you purview for you to determine or
dictate what is appropriate for me to do or not do.


You were subjecting the entire newsgroup to your personal feud with Ed Gin.
As with me, you do not know when to let go of something. You went on and on
with him just as you are now doing with me, never seeming to realize when
something is over. It is the hallmark of a stalker. I don't think Ed Gin,
whatever his other faults, was ever a stalker.
[...]

But you KNEW what kind of person he was!


Over time yes, and when I realized what ad who he was, the feud
commenced, but I have since put the man behind me and moved on. For
some peculiar reason you cannot do the same. I have no compulsion to
mention his name in this forum except to request that you refrain from
doing so. Everyone has heard it umteen guzilliion times before. You
can stop now or have you no self-control?


His name is less likely to be mentioned by me or anyone else once you stop
your stalking.

You can reason with me because I am
not a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. You seem to have no sense of
people.


No one can reason with someone as unreasonable as you. One who has no
social contact with people can't possibly have anything but a warped
and jaded perspective concerning another's sense of people.


It is only us hermits who have any perspective on mankind. The rest of you
are too involved and can't see the forest for the trees.
[...]

An easy solution is for you to stop stalking me. After all, the only
association I have with you is over the Ed Gin episode.


If I were to be gone tomorrow, you would continue to rave and rant
about Ed Gin ... the criminal vandal troll that destroyed ARBR, so
there is no reason to pretend otherwise. Nor should you blame your
association with me as an excuse for recounting the Ed GIn Episode
over and over again. Man you really need to get a grip. Either that
or the nurse should pry your hands off the keyboard an put you back in
your straight-jacket.


Stop stalking and see what happens. Your name only gets mentioned in
connection with Ed Gin when you bring the matter up.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #13  
Old February 24th 08, 01:52 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
JimmyMac
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,754
Default ARBR - RIP

On Feb 21, 9:22 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...

On Feb 20, 2:45 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:

[...]
All you had to do was tell him to go **** himself, but you were too
stupid
to know enough to do that.


Sure I could have, but stupidity isn't what prevented me from doing
that. I simply chose not to stoop to his and your level. Why is this
simple notion so difficult for the "great one" to comprehend? My
unwillingness to do as you do is not an indication that I am stupid.
It is an indication that I am more of a gentleman. You seem not to
understand that It is not within your purview to determine or dictate
what is appropriate for me to do or not do.


You were subjecting the entire newsgroup to your personal feud with Ed Gin.
As with me, you do not know when to let go of something. You went on and on
with him just as you are now doing with me, never seeming to realize when
something is over. It is the hallmark of a stalker. I don't think Ed Gin,
whatever his other faults, was ever a stalker.
[...]


If you realize when something is over and know when to let go of
something then realize and let go of this as I have asked. Ed Gin is
gone. My feud with Ed Gin is long over with. ARBR is still hear. Ed
Gin did not kill it. Let it go and move on. I you realize that is
all over and really can let go, then do so. Never mention the man
again. You can't do that can you?

But you KNEW what kind of person he was!


Over time yes, and when I realized what and who he was, the feud
commenced, but I have since put the man behind me and moved on. For
some peculiar reason you cannot do the same. I have no compulsion to
mention his name in this forum except to request that you refrain from
doing so. Everyone has heard it umteen guzilliion times before. You
can stop now or have you no self-control?


His name is less likely to be mentioned by me or anyone else once you stop
your stalking.


As if the two have anything to do with one another? Why Am I trying
to reason with a complete idiot?

You can reason with me because I am
not a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. You seem to have no sense of
people.


No one can reason with someone as unreasonable as you. One who has no
social contact with people can't possibly have anything but a warped
and jaded perspective concerning another's sense of people.


It is only us hermits who have any perspective on mankind. The rest of you
are too involved and can't see the forest for the trees.
[...]


One cannot have any perspective on mankind when one has no contact
with mankind since there is no point of reference.

An easy solution is for you to stop stalking me. After all, the only
association I have with you is over the Ed Gin episode.


If I were to be gone tomorrow, you would continue to rave and rant
about Ed Gin ... the criminal vandal troll that destroyed ARBR, so
there is no reason to pretend otherwise. Nor should you blame your
association with me as an excuse for recounting the Ed GIn Episode
over and over again. Man you really need to get a grip. Either that
or the nurse should pry your hands off the keyboard an put you back in
your straight-jacket.


Stop stalking and see what happens. Your name only gets mentioned in
connection with Ed Gin when you bring the matter up.


When I bring what matter up??? I do not bring the Ed Gin matter
up ... you do ... you know the OLD bull**** ... the criminal vandal
who destroyed ARBR ... NOT!!!!! All I have ever done is object to the
preposterous, monotonous repetition of this falsehood. There is no
reason for you to mention Ed Gin in objection to being "stalked". One
has nothing to do with the other no matter what kind of spin you
vainly attempt to put on things.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #14  
Old February 25th 08, 05:33 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
Michael Press
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,202
Default ARBR - RIP

In article
,
JimmyMac wrote:

I do not understand the Subject: line.
ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

--
Michael Press
  #15  
Old February 25th 08, 10:24 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 275
Default ARBR - RIP

Nice Going, Ed! That's telling 'em!

As usual, your observations are extremely perceptive and right on the
mark.

Please keep up the good work!

We always enjoy reading your posts.

Best of luck to you.

  #16  
Old February 25th 08, 05:38 PM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,212
Default ARBR - RIP


"Michael Press" wrote in message
...
In article
,

[...]

I do not understand the Subject: line.
ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.


It is all garbage being posted by blackguards and knaves, scoundrels and
charlatans, idiots and imbeciles. Only Ed Dolan the Great saves the group
from itself!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #17  
Old February 25th 08, 05:56 PM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,212
Default ARBR - RIP


wrote in message
...
Nice Going, Ed! That's telling 'em!

As usual, your observations are extremely perceptive and right on the
mark.

Please keep up the good work!

We always enjoy reading your posts.

Best of luck to you.


Just a note from one of my many admirers!

It is a message like this that encourages the Great One in His mission of
bringing enlightenment to all the denizens of these confounded cycling
newsgroups. If I don't tell them what is good for them, who will. It is a
heavy responsibility, but one that Ed Dolan the Great shoulders with
resignation. It is part of my noblesse oblige, which I bestow freely on my
inferiors with no thought of personal gain. Now you know why I am also a
Great Saint - and a long-suffering One at that.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #18  
Old February 26th 08, 12:28 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
JimmyMac
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,754
Default ARBR - RIP

On Feb 24, 11:33 pm, Michael Press wrote:
In article
,

JimmyMac wrote:

I do not understand the Subject: line.
ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

--
Michael Press


And I don't understand why this was attributed to me, but no biggie.
  #19  
Old February 26th 08, 02:24 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
Tom Sherman[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,890
Default ARBR - RIP

Michael Press wrote:

I do not understand the Subject: line.
ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
  #20  
Old February 26th 08, 04:06 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,212
Default ARBR - RIP


"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Michael Press wrote:

I do not understand the Subject: line.
ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.


Tom Sherman is jealous, ever the failing of midgets and dwarfs like him with
small minds. In the "good old days" he dominated this newsgroup by hook or
crook. Most of his posts were then off-topic too. I have more or less
reformed him and he no longer sins so egregiously.

Ed Dolan the Great is like a Great White Shark who patrols these ARBR waters
and sees to it that everyone stays in their proper place. Yea, ARBR has been
cleansed and made pure by Ed Dolan the Great, aka Saint Edward the Great.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARBR - RIP JimmyMac General 24 February 29th 08 12:51 AM
Little ARBR vs. Big RBM Edward Dolan General 9 April 19th 06 05:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.