A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Racing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Doesn't 7 minus 1 equal 6 Lance Armstrong?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 27th 05, 03:13 AM
D. Ferguson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Doesn't 7 minus 1 equal 6 Lance Armstrong?

On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:29:16 +0000 (UTC), Jim Spriggs
wrote:

wrote:

...


Why is anybody bothered about drug use in sport? (I write as one of
those (rare?) people who doesn't give a toss about sport or drugs.) One
reason why people might be bothered about drug use in sport is because
it's cheating, but if the rules were changed to say "you may now use any
substances you like including the ones previously proscribed", then it
wouldn't be.



It would turn into "who is willing to risk their health the most".

The idea of competition in sport isn't "who has the best chemicals".

It would encourage kids to use these drugs and harm them.


Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real NON RBR Reaction Rik Van Diesel Racing 22 August 27th 05 02:54 PM
140th place garners extensive media coverage. crit PRO Racing 0 March 6th 05 11:02 PM
The word is out: It's over. packfiller Racing 3 October 15th 04 06:22 PM
L.A. Confidential Excerpt 'Dis Guy Racing 3 October 10th 04 05:31 AM
Doping or not? Read this: never_doped Racing 0 August 4th 03 01:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.