|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Campy Front Derailleur - Std. vs CT
I am building up a new frame and have both std and CT front
derailleurs. The bike will have FSA Compact cranks with FSA 50/34 rings. Std., 10 sp., double, front derailleurs have shifted these cranks fine. My experience with the original Record CT front derailleur yielded inferior shifts to the std. cage. Will the current model CT front derailleurs function better than the std model? Derailleurs are Chorus and seatube is 35 mm. Shifters are pre 2007 Ergo. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Campy Front Derailleur - Std. vs CT
Paul Kopit wrote:
I am building up a new frame and have both std and CT front derailleurs. The bike will have FSA Compact cranks with FSA 50/34 rings. Std., 10 sp., double, front derailleurs have shifted these cranks fine. My experience with the original Record CT front derailleur yielded inferior shifts to the std. cage. Will the current model CT front derailleurs function better than the std model? Derailleurs are Chorus and seatube is 35 mm. Shifters are pre 2007 Ergo. In a test of compact cranks in TOUR magazin one of the observations was that the Campy CT FD only works (slightly) better than the standard FD with Campy compact cranks. On all other compact cranks the standard FD was the better choice. Lou |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Campy Front Derailleur - Std. vs CT
Paul Kopit wrote: I am building up a new frame and have both std and CT front derailleurs. The bike will have FSA Compact cranks with FSA 50/34 rings. Std., 10 sp., double, front derailleurs have shifted these cranks fine. My experience with the original Record CT front derailleur yielded inferior shifts to the std. cage. Will the current model CT front derailleurs function better than the std model? Derailleurs are Chorus and seatube is 35 mm. Shifters are pre 2007 Ergo. NO. FSA cranks, for some reason, do not like CT Campag FDs, use the standard one for any non-Campag crank. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Campy Front Derailleur - Std. vs CT
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:35:14 GMT, Paul Kopit wrote:
I am building up a new frame and have both std and CT front derailleurs. The bike will have FSA Compact cranks with FSA 50/34 rings. Std., 10 sp., double, front derailleurs have shifted these cranks fine. My experience with the original Record CT front derailleur yielded inferior shifts to the std. cage. Will the current model CT front derailleurs function better than the std model? Thanks for the recommendations for using the Std. front derailleur with FSA cranks. That was my actual eperience before but I had thought that Campy would have improved. It must be that the shift assist placement on a Campy ring is a bit different. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Campy CT front derailleur | Tim McTeague | Techniques | 5 | October 7th 06 02:02 PM |
Campy front derailleur with STI? | Mike Yankee | Techniques | 3 | November 7th 05 03:24 PM |
FA: Campy 10-Speed Front Derailleur | Rod | Marketplace | 0 | March 1st 05 09:35 PM |
Campy Record front derailleur | aram bayzaee | Marketplace | 0 | December 4th 04 11:25 PM |
Campy Record Front Derailleur | aram bayzaee | Marketplace | 0 | November 29th 04 04:39 AM |