|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25
Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. Bret Cahill |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
On 26/04/2016 06:48, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25 Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. Bret Cahill I trust you remember that next time you need to reach europe. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
On 26/04/2016 05:48, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25 Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. And if anyone can cycle from JFK to LHR, it'll be one of the usual suspects here (as long as sufficient vindaloo and beer can be obtained along the way). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25
Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. And if anyone can cycle from JFK to LHR, it'll be one of the usual suspects here (as long as sufficient vindaloo and beer can be obtained along the way). Posting stuff like that will cause it to happen. Bret Cahill |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25
Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. Bret Cahill I trust you remember that next time you need to reach europe. I'd like to see the hedges between fields in the UK in person. Supposedly they have their own eco systems. Maybe a real thatched roof would be interesting too. I was discussing thatched roofs with an Irish woman and I told her if she tried a thatched roof in SoCal it would be treated as an act of terrorism. But I can't really justify blowing my sub Sir Issac Newton carbon footprint just to sit in a hedge or inspect a roof. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 05:21:46 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25 Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. Bret Cahill I trust you remember that next time you need to reach europe. I'd like to see the hedges between fields in the UK in person. Supposedly they have their own eco systems. I can watch the birds come and go from my armchair. https://goo.gl/maps/aUmgnkgShNy But I can't really justify blowing my sub Sir Issac Newton carbon footprint just to sit in a hedge or inspect a roof. http://www.qm2.org.uk/itinerary.html#Jun |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
On 27/04/2016 08:52, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25 Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. Bret Cahill I trust you remember that next time you need to reach europe. I'd like to see the hedges between fields in the UK in person. Supposedly they have their own eco systems. I can watch the birds come and go from my armchair. https://goo.gl/maps/aUmgnkgShNy But I can't really justify blowing my sub Sir Issac Newton carbon footprint just to sit in a hedge or inspect a roof. http://www.qm2.org.uk/itinerary.html#Jun A high tech version of the Caloric Ship by Ericsson could use partial pyrolysis at sea dumping bio char overboard. This would result in overseas travel with a _negative_ carbon footprint. The problem with the early air engines was they didn't have the precision machining ability for the highly convoluted surfaces necessary for heat transfer. The Swedish kockums stirling relies on hundreds of bar pressure. This is not the cheapest way to go for heat transfer, especially if the goal is low temperature biochar. Pistons should not be circular but have dozens of fins that ride in slots in the cylinder walls. This is possible now. Not sure about the Atlantic but there are areas in the Pacific where you could harvest tons of plastic and other trash and burn that for fuel. Forever. Bret Cahill So still no mention of how you cycle across the Atlantic. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25
Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. Bret Cahill I trust you remember that next time you need to reach europe. I'd like to see the hedges between fields in the UK in person. Supposedly they have their own eco systems. I can watch the birds come and go from my armchair. https://goo.gl/maps/aUmgnkgShNy But I can't really justify blowing my sub Sir Issac Newton carbon footprint just to sit in a hedge or inspect a roof. http://www.qm2.org.uk/itinerary.html#Jun A high tech version of the Caloric Ship by Ericsson could use partial pyrolysis at sea dumping bio char overboard. This would result in overseas travel with a _negative_ carbon footprint. The problem with the early air engines was they didn't have the precision machining ability for the highly convoluted surfaces necessary for heat transfer. The Swedish kockums stirling relies on hundreds of bar pressure. This is not the cheapest way to go for heat transfer, especially if the goal is low temperature biochar. Pistons should not be circular but have dozens of fins that ride in slots in the cylinder walls. This is possible now. Not sure about the Atlantic but there are areas in the Pacific where you could harvest tons of plastic and other trash and burn that for fuel. Forever. Bret Cahill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 05:48:51 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25 Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. Bret Cahill |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle?
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 05:48:51 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
http://www.marke****ch.com/story/4-t...oil-2016-04-25 Lastly, the Saudi Vision 2030 plan implies that the world just doesn't need as much oil as it used to. There's no reason to drive or fly around when you can cycle. There is a guy from my home city who is travelling from Chile to Hull, UK with no motors involved or sea crossings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Bushby |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cycle commuters healthier than those that drive | Simon Mason | UK | 1 | October 31st 11 06:15 PM |
Motorists drive closer to cyclists on cycle lanes, says CTC | Ron Ruff | Techniques | 1 | September 18th 09 12:54 AM |
installing an old speedo cable drive on a rear wheel for prop drive | meb[_94_] | Techniques | 0 | April 22nd 08 01:24 PM |
installing an old speedo cable drive on a rear wheel for prop drive | meb[_92_] | Techniques | 1 | April 20th 08 11:48 AM |
Contrary patterns: drive, radial; non drive, 2x. | Luke | Techniques | 13 | September 3rd 07 03:42 PM |