A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More on mobile phones & other wireless devices



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 19th 07, 07:05 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

On 18 Apr 2007 14:34:52 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
:

On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You can
read his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from "Cell-Phone
Wars", a recent doc on mobile phones.

You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low


Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell phone
radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work! DUH!

to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.

My guess is that Vanderman is beating the bushes and if you do
that long enough, you can find someone who will say anything.


Mike,

1) What frequency and power levels do cell phone use today??


"Cell Phone - A wireless telephone that sends and receives messages
using radiofrequency energy in the 800-900 megahertz portion of the
radiofrequency (RF) spectrum."

What's "low" about that? It's a microwave frequency, like a microwave
oven: "[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second":

"Microwaves - A subset of radio waves that have frequencies ranging
from around 300 million waves per second (300 MHz) to three billion
waves per second (3 GHz)."

So it "cooks" your brain slowly, which is why it has been shown to
cause tumors on the auditory nerve..

2) What is ionizing radiation and how is it created?

3) Please relate items 1) and 2) above


What for? A microwave oven can kill you, regardless of whether it uses
ionizing radiation or not. What you're saying, in other words, is that
it's okay to cook your brain, as long as it's done slowly.

Please stick to subjects you have a glimmer of knowledge about.

DUH back at you

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
Ads
  #12  
Old April 19th 07, 07:06 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:01:34 +0200, "RobDee" wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
.. .
On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You can read
his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from "Cell-Phone Wars",
a recent doc on mobile phones.

You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low


Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell phone
radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work! DUH!


I suggest you get an encyclopedia suitable for any 5 year old - check out
the ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM. You will see quite clearly that Bill is
right - it is even lower frequency than visible light! Maybe you don't have
that on *YOUR* planet?


What's "low" about radiation than can be used to cook food? Please
explain.

to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.

My guess is that Vanderman is beating the bushes and if you do
that long enough, you can find someone who will say anything.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are
fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  #13  
Old April 19th 07, 07:09 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:59:27 GMT, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700,
(Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You can read
his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from "Cell-Phone Wars",
a recent doc on mobile phones.

You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low


Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell phone
radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work! DUH!


Vandeman, you would look like less of a liar if you would at least
reply to full sentences: I stated that it is "too low to cause ionization",
and that is a fact. It is simply dishonest to try to put words in
people's mouths.


BS. I quoted you verbatim.

And, as I said, it is not clear from Carlo's bio as to
what expertise he has regarding the interaction of electromagnetic
radition with matter (what happens is very much dependent on the frequency
of the radiation).

to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.

My guess is that Vanderman is beating the bushes and if you do
that long enough, you can find someone who will say anything.



As I said ...

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  #14  
Old April 19th 07, 01:10 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Chris[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 184
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

Mike Vandeman wrote in
:

On 18 Apr 2007 14:34:52 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
m:

On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You can
read his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from
"Cell-Phone Wars", a recent doc on mobile phones.

You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low

Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell
phone radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work!
DUH!

to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.

My guess is that Vanderman is beating the bushes and if you do
that long enough, you can find someone who will say anything.


Mike,

1) What frequency and power levels do cell phone use today??


"Cell Phone - A wireless telephone that sends and receives messages
using radiofrequency energy in the 800-900 megahertz portion of the
radiofrequency (RF) spectrum."

What's "low" about that? It's a microwave frequency, like a microwave
oven: "[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second":

"Microwaves - A subset of radio waves that have frequencies ranging
from around 300 million waves per second (300 MHz) to three billion
waves per second (3 GHz)."

So it "cooks" your brain slowly, which is why it has been shown to
cause tumors on the auditory nerve..


You have no idea what you are talking about do you?


I wail make this as simple as I can for you.

300MHz to 3GHz is in the RF spectrum (longer wavelengths) and in entire
spectrum is relitily low frequency
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency

Much higher frequencies (lower wave lengths) that are all around you all
the time, like visible light for example
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum

What 'cooks' food in a microwave oven is a particular frequency (wave
length) that 'excites' water/fat at 2.45 GHz.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven

You will notice that frequencies that cell phone use AVOIDS that
particular frequency that microwave ovens do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_frequencies

That is done for 2 reasons:
1) Cell phone companies are tring to avoid 'cooking' thier customers
2) Microwave ovens would interfere with cell operation


2) What is ionizing radiation and how is it created?

3) Please relate items 1) and 2) above


What for? A microwave oven can kill you, regardless of whether it uses
ionizing radiation or not. What you're saying, in other words, is that
it's okay to cook your brain, as long as it's done slowly.

Please stick to subjects you have a glimmer of knowledge about.

DUH back at you

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #15  
Old April 19th 07, 03:47 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

On 19 Apr 2007 12:10:29 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
:

On 18 Apr 2007 14:34:52 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
:

On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You can
read his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from
"Cell-Phone Wars", a recent doc on mobile phones.

You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low

Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell
phone radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work!
DUH!

to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.

My guess is that Vanderman is beating the bushes and if you do
that long enough, you can find someone who will say anything.

Mike,

1) What frequency and power levels do cell phone use today??


"Cell Phone - A wireless telephone that sends and receives messages
using radiofrequency energy in the 800-900 megahertz portion of the
radiofrequency (RF) spectrum."

What's "low" about that? It's a microwave frequency, like a microwave
oven: "[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second":

"Microwaves - A subset of radio waves that have frequencies ranging
from around 300 million waves per second (300 MHz) to three billion
waves per second (3 GHz)."

So it "cooks" your brain slowly, which is why it has been shown to
cause tumors on the auditory nerve..


You have no idea what you are talking about do you?


I wail make this as simple as I can for you.

300MHz to 3GHz is in the RF spectrum (longer wavelengths) and in entire
spectrum is relitily low frequency
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency

Much higher frequencies (lower wave lengths) that are all around you all
the time, like visible light for example
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum

What 'cooks' food in a microwave oven is a particular frequency (wave
length) that 'excites' water/fat at 2.45 GHz.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven


"[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second"

In other words, 915 Mhz is also capable of cooking you, and cell phone
frequencies are very close to that. Of course, nothing in this message
proves that they are safe, which they are NOT. DUH!

You will notice that frequencies that cell phone use AVOIDS that
particular frequency that microwave ovens do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_frequencies

That is done for 2 reasons:
1) Cell phone companies are tring to avoid 'cooking' thier customers
2) Microwave ovens would interfere with cell operation


2) What is ionizing radiation and how is it created?

3) Please relate items 1) and 2) above


What for? A microwave oven can kill you, regardless of whether it uses
ionizing radiation or not. What you're saying, in other words, is that
it's okay to cook your brain, as long as it's done slowly.

Please stick to subjects you have a glimmer of knowledge about.

DUH back at you

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  #16  
Old April 19th 07, 03:56 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Chris[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 184
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

Mike Vandeman wrote in
:

On 19 Apr 2007 12:10:29 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
m:

On 18 Apr 2007 14:34:52 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
m:

On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You
can read his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from
"Cell-Phone Wars", a recent doc on mobile phones.

You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low

Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell
phone radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work!
DUH!

to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.

My guess is that Vanderman is beating the bushes and if you do
that long enough, you can find someone who will say anything.

Mike,

1) What frequency and power levels do cell phone use today??

"Cell Phone - A wireless telephone that sends and receives messages
using radiofrequency energy in the 800-900 megahertz portion of the
radiofrequency (RF) spectrum."

What's "low" about that? It's a microwave frequency, like a
microwave oven: "[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of
either 915 or 2450 millioncycles per second":

"Microwaves - A subset of radio waves that have frequencies ranging
from around 300 million waves per second (300 MHz) to three billion
waves per second (3 GHz)."

So it "cooks" your brain slowly, which is why it has been shown to
cause tumors on the auditory nerve..


You have no idea what you are talking about do you?


I wail make this as simple as I can for you.

300MHz to 3GHz is in the RF spectrum (longer wavelengths) and in
entire spectrum is relitily low frequency
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency

Much higher frequencies (lower wave lengths) that are all around you
all the time, like visible light for example
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum

What 'cooks' food in a microwave oven is a particular frequency (wave
length) that 'excites' water/fat at 2.45 GHz.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven


"[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second"

In other words, 915 Mhz is also capable of cooking you, and cell phone
frequencies are very close to that. Of course, nothing in this message
proves that they are safe, which they are NOT. DUH!


Cell phone AVOID the 915 MHz freq also. The closest cell freq is 14 Mhz
away.

I believe I am having a discussion with an idiot.

'Close' is not good enough, very specific frequencies are needed to
'excite' water (i.e. your brain)

The very lower power emitted from cell phone is 125 mWatts has not be
shown to be unsafe to humans.

Low power Microwave ovens , type that is used in a home, areare 1000
Watts, or about 8000 times more powerful.

Please do not try to link Microwave ovens and cell phones.

I do not feel constant cell phone use is safe myself, especially for the
young. Any type of microwave energy (800, 900 MHz 2.4 Ghz) at the
lowest engeries (125mW) at 2 - 3 cm from your brain cant be healthy. I
dont own one.

But.... Cell phones DO NOT COOK YOUR BRAIN. May cause cancer.




You will notice that frequencies that cell phone use AVOIDS that
particular frequency that microwave ovens do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_frequencies

That is done for 2 reasons:
1) Cell phone companies are tring to avoid 'cooking' thier
customers 2) Microwave ovens would interfere with cell operation


2) What is ionizing radiation and how is it created?

3) Please relate items 1) and 2) above

What for? A microwave oven can kill you, regardless of whether it
uses ionizing radiation or not. What you're saying, in other words,
is that it's okay to cook your brain, as long as it's done slowly.

Please stick to subjects you have a glimmer of knowledge about.

DUH back at you

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that
you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #17  
Old April 19th 07, 05:35 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
cc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 723
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On 19 Apr 2007 12:10:29 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
:

On 18 Apr 2007 14:34:52 GMT, Chris wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote in
:

On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You can
read his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from
"Cell-Phone Wars", a recent doc on mobile phones.
You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low
Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell
phone radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work!
DUH!

to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.

My guess is that Vanderman is beating the bushes and if you do
that long enough, you can find someone who will say anything.
Mike,

1) What frequency and power levels do cell phone use today??
"Cell Phone - A wireless telephone that sends and receives messages
using radiofrequency energy in the 800-900 megahertz portion of the
radiofrequency (RF) spectrum."

What's "low" about that? It's a microwave frequency, like a microwave
oven: "[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second":

"Microwaves - A subset of radio waves that have frequencies ranging
from around 300 million waves per second (300 MHz) to three billion
waves per second (3 GHz)."

So it "cooks" your brain slowly, which is why it has been shown to
cause tumors on the auditory nerve..

You have no idea what you are talking about do you?


I wail make this as simple as I can for you.

300MHz to 3GHz is in the RF spectrum (longer wavelengths) and in entire
spectrum is relitily low frequency
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency

Much higher frequencies (lower wave lengths) that are all around you all
the time, like visible light for example
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum

What 'cooks' food in a microwave oven is a particular frequency (wave
length) that 'excites' water/fat at 2.45 GHz.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven


"[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second"

In other words, 915 Mhz is also capable of cooking you, and cell phone
frequencies are very close to that. Of course, nothing in this message
proves that they are safe, which they are NOT. DUH!


As Chris pointed out, microwave
radiation excites a particular rotation
mode in the water molecule. All this
does is increase the temperature. This
is totally different than what is
expected to cause cancer, which are
mutations caused my DNA scission or
other damage to genetic material - what
someone else termed "ionizing
radiation". Do your own research, Mike.



You will notice that frequencies that cell phone use AVOIDS that
particular frequency that microwave ovens do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_frequencies

That is done for 2 reasons:
1) Cell phone companies are tring to avoid 'cooking' thier customers
2) Microwave ovens would interfere with cell operation

2) What is ionizing radiation and how is it created?

3) Please relate items 1) and 2) above
What for? A microwave oven can kill you, regardless of whether it uses
ionizing radiation or not. What you're saying, in other words, is that
it's okay to cook your brain, as long as it's done slowly.

Please stick to subjects you have a glimmer of knowledge about.

DUH back at you

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  #18  
Old April 19th 07, 08:43 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Jeff Strickland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 613
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:59:27 GMT, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On 17 Apr 2007 22:10:20 -0700,
(Bill Z.)
wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

Check out Dr. George Carlo's site
www.safewireless.org/ You can
read
his report to the CEO of AT&T and view a clip from "Cell-Phone Wars",
a recent doc on mobile phones.

You can find a bio of this dude at
http://www.tapsns.com/gallery.php?mode=profile&galleryid=3202.

It isn't clear what expertise he has regarding the interaction
of electromagnetic radiation with matter, particularly when the
frequency is too low

Cell phone frequency is "low"? What planet are you from? If cell phone
radiation didn't interact with matter, they wouldn't work! DUH!


Vandeman, you would look like less of a liar if you would at least
reply to full sentences: I stated that it is "too low to cause
ionization",
and that is a fact. It is simply dishonest to try to put words in
people's mouths.


BS. I quoted you verbatim.



WHAT BILL SAID,
quote
.... frequency is too low to cause ionization and when the power level
is so low that heating is negligible.
/quote


WHAT MIKE SAID
quote
Cell phone frequency is "low"?

/quote


WHAT JEFF SAYS
Notice that Mike morphs Bill's statement by driopping key words, then
replying to the remaining words as if those were the ones spoken (or typed,
in this case).

Mike is not only a liar, he is an intellectually dishonest liar. He could at
least lie in his response to what was said, but he changes what was said,
then lies about that. And he subsequently states emphatically that he
quoted, which only restates his original lie. That's three lies ...







  #19  
Old April 19th 07, 10:25 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Bill Z.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,556
Default More on mobile phones & other wireless devices

Mike Vandeman writes:

On 19 Apr 2007 12:10:29 GMT, Chris wrote:


What 'cooks' food in a microwave oven is a particular frequency (wave
length) that 'excites' water/fat at 2.45 GHz.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven


"[a microwave oven] operates at a frequency of either 915 or
2450 millioncycles per second"

In other words, 915 Mhz is also capable of cooking you, and cell phone
frequencies are very close to that. Of course, nothing in this message
proves that they are safe, which they are NOT. DUH!


Instead of being reduced to silly statements like "duh", I suggest
Vanderman pick up a graduate-level text on electricity and magnetism,
plus a few books on quantum mechanics so that he can understand what
is going on. The width in frequency of these transitions can be quite
narrow (and depends on the lifetime of excited states - the longer the
lifetime, the narrower the width).

I'm not going to go into the details - it would take far too long to
explain, and there is no point in my writing a physics textbook for
Vanderman's edification.


2) What is ionizing radiation and how is it created?

3) Please relate items 1) and 2) above

What for? A microwave oven can kill you, regardless of whether it uses
ionizing radiation or not. What you're saying, in other words, is that
it's okay to cook your brain, as long as it's done slowly.


Because a single photon at a sufficiently high frequency is enough to
ionize something, whereas to cook you, you need enough energy to
raise your body temperature to the point where you willl actually
be cooked.

The furnace/wall heater in your house can be used to cook you too,
provided that you raise ambient temperature sufficiently (which
would require a small room and good insulation).


--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are mobile phones wiping out our bees? Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 24 April 24th 07 07:05 PM
Hub Dynamo for charging mobile phones biking-geordie UK 9 October 30th 06 11:49 AM
So many people driving with mobile phones dannyfrankszzz UK 22 September 7th 06 12:06 PM
Mobile 'phones crackdown MartinM UK 79 November 23rd 04 02:32 PM
Mobile Phones Vincent Wilcox UK 38 December 5th 03 10:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.