|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and
couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. Maybe boosting isn't doping in Greg's mind. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
On Jun 16, 3:59*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops *Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. Maybe boosting isn't doping in Greg's mind. Maybe doping isn't doping except when it is in Greg's mind. It's been claimed that Greg was the first to introduce EPO to the Peloton after he was treated with it after his gunshot wound. One does not win the tour on spring water, no? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
ric wrote:
On Jun 16, 3:59 pm, Anton Berlin wrote: I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. Maybe boosting isn't doping in Greg's mind. Maybe doping isn't doping except when it is in Greg's mind. It's been claimed that Greg was the first to introduce EPO to the Peloton after he was treated with it after his gunshot wound. I know this is rbr, but does anyone really believe this? Steve One does not win the tour on spring water, no? -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
Anton Berlin wrote:
I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Hinault ?? Fignon ?? Roche ?? Hampsten ?? Indurain ?? Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. And Roche is implicated with Dr Ferrari (the second stint at Carrera) . Regards, Steven Perryman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
On Jun 16, 1:38*pm, S Perryman wrote:
Anton Berlin wrote: I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Hinault ?? Fignon ?? Roche ?? Hampsten ?? Indurain ?? Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops *Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. And Roche is implicated with Dr Ferrari (the second stint at Carrera) . Regards, Steven Perryman Roche-dirty, Indurain-dirty, Fignon-dirty |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
ric wrote:
On Jun 16, 3:59 pm, Anton Berlin wrote: I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. Maybe boosting isn't doping in Greg's mind. Maybe doping isn't doping except when it is in Greg's mind. It's been claimed that Greg was the first to introduce EPO to the Peloton after he was treated with it after his gunshot wound. One does not win the tour on spring water, no? Dumbass, How would EPO be used to treat a gunshot wound? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
S Perryman wrote:
Anton Berlin wrote: I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Hinault ?? Fignon ?? Roche ?? Hampsten ?? Indurain ?? Hampsten of those. No one really thinks Indurain was clean. Fignon admitted to doping when he said that he did not think that it attributed to his cancer. Hinault? All I can say is that he's old school. Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. And Roche is implicated with Dr Ferrari (the second stint at Carrera) . Regards, Steven Perryman |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
Anton Berlin wrote:
I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. Maybe boosting isn't doping in Greg's mind. Dumbass, Lemond left the US to race in Europe in 1980 after Carter boycotted the Olympics. He was with Guimard and Renault in 1981. Eddie didn't start with the Federation until 1978. Prior to that he was painting bridges in Joisey. Obviously they have remained friends since that time, but Eddie's direct influence would have been minimal. Plus, at that time, Eddie had no contacts with the pro peloton or western Europe. Who has a higher BMI, Lemond or your girlfriend? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
z, fred wrote:
How would EPO be used to treat a gunshot wound? Gentle rubbing. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is Lemond the only successful cyclist that wasn't a doper?
On Jun 16, 3:38*pm, S Perryman wrote:
Anton Berlin wrote: I tried to give my girlfriend a little history of the problem and couldn't find think of a rider that wasn't caught or later confessed - I could only think of Lemond. Hinault ?? Fignon ?? Roche ?? Hampsten ?? Indurain ?? Then I added in a little bit about the way dopers can often be identified by the company they keep, Armstrong with Ferrari, (everyone with Armstrong) (someone should draw one of those small world diagrams showing Armstrong as the hub)) Frank Schleck with the clinic payment and Oh.... ooops *Lemond spent a lot of time with Eddie B. And Roche is implicated with Dr Ferrari (the second stint at Carrera) . Regards, Steven Perryman Roche - we know, Indurain - we damn well know, Hampsten, (my qualification was a grand tour and the worlds) Fignon - admitted doper (Hinault - unsure but close enough with lemond to boost ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Lance Armstrong a great doper or the greatest doper ever? | Anton Berlin | Racing | 36 | July 20th 09 09:42 AM |
Successful Overshoes | Trevor A Panther[_2_] | UK | 4 | December 16th 08 05:32 PM |
Successful Slime | [email protected] | Techniques | 10 | December 25th 07 12:17 AM |
Another successful Unicon!!!! | ca99medina | Unicycling | 6 | August 10th 06 02:13 AM |
Successful TT | Callas | UK | 2 | August 6th 04 08:59 AM |