|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another cyclist Killed!!
This one bothers me because it is close to home!!
http://www.gwinnettdailyonline.com/G...3D7732E075.asp It also bothers me since it my understanding that if I was going straight at that point I was to be in the thru traffic lane and not on the right of the turn lane. Also, the "turn lane" is long and striped such that there are "no cross zones", hence if a cyclist was to stay to the right of the turn lane it would be breaking the law also. The county claims it put a bike lane on this roadway, but it's not striped for one, especially at that point. And to boot they have a 16 inch "rumple strip" on the white line, so it forces you over into the lane or into the glass and crap. s http://boardnbike.com |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
This is an all-too-common roadway feature that stimies cyclists. A long
right turn only exit lane that forces cyclists into dangerous situations that can end badly. Personally, I stay to the right of the right turn exit lane, looking back far down the road. When it's clear, I sprint like a maniac to get back into the main road, just as the exit lane is separating. The only time I ride the left side of the exit lane to merge smoothly with the straight-through lane is when the road is blatantly deserted. Also, the early time of day of this accident made for poor visibility. My policy is to always assume brain-deadness behind the wheel, which typically helps to avoid accidents... -- -------------------------- Andre Charlebois AGC-PC support http://agc-pc.tripod.com BPE, MCSE4.0, CNA, A+ "smiles" wrote in message .. . This one bothers me because it is close to home!! http://www.gwinnettdailyonline.com/G...3D7732E075.asp It also bothers me since it my understanding that if I was going straight at that point I was to be in the thru traffic lane and not on the right of the turn lane. Also, the "turn lane" is long and striped such that there are "no cross zones", hence if a cyclist was to stay to the right of the turn lane it would be breaking the law also. The county claims it put a bike lane on this roadway, but it's not striped for one, especially at that point. And to boot they have a 16 inch "rumple strip" on the white line, so it forces you over into the lane or into the glass and crap. s http://boardnbike.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"smiles" wrote in message .. . This one bothers me because it is close to home!! http://www.gwinnettdailyonline.com/G...3D7732E075.asp It also bothers me since it my understanding that if I was going straight at that point I was to be in the thru traffic lane and not on the right of the turn lane. Also, the "turn lane" is long and striped such that there are "no cross zones", hence if a cyclist was to stay to the right of the turn lane it would be breaking the law also. The county claims it put a bike lane on this roadway, but it's not striped for one, especially at that point. And to boot they have a 16 inch "rumple strip" on the white line, so it forces you over into the lane or into the glass and crap. s http://boardnbike.com I don't live far from there. At 5:00 a.m. it's still pitch dark. The article doesn't speak to how the riders were dressed or if they had lights. I think the interpretation of the law saying they weren't sufficiently to the right is bogus given the presence of the turn lane. I also think that, generally, if you hit someone from behind, it's your fault. But in the pitch dark and not knowing about lighting, I don't think it's too safe to jump to any conclusions about this story. But I feel for the family and friends in their loss. Bob C. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:42:18 GMT, "Andre" wrote:
This is an all-too-common roadway feature that stimies cyclists. A long right turn only exit lane that forces cyclists into dangerous situations that can end badly. Personally, I stay to the right of the right turn exit lane, looking back far down the road. When it's clear, I sprint like a maniac to get back into the main road, just as the exit lane is separating. The only time I ride the left side of the exit lane to merge smoothly with the straight-through lane is when the road is blatantly deserted. Also, the early time of day of this accident made for poor visibility. My policy is to always assume brain-deadness behind the wheel, which typically helps to avoid accidents... -- -------------------------- Andre Charlebois AGC-PC support http://agc-pc.tripod.com BPE, MCSE4.0, CNA, A+ This is a problem, b/c if one is behaving like a 'vehicle', the natural position, if you're going straight, would be taking the regular lane (past the turnpoint), or at least riding the rightmost tire track of the normal lane. However, then a faster vehicle wishing to turn right can end up passing you on the right, and in fact, if you don't take the lane you're in, you could be passed closely on the left at the same time - at least theoretically. I try and speed past the turn point, in the regular lane, in the tire track, just as a regular car would do, but time it so as not to be passed. It's a doable sprint on a 25-35mph road most of the time, but the one time I was passed it was a bit disconcerting to see a vehicle go by on my right, I must say! ;-) If you ride to the right in the turn lane, you risk being trapped and prevented from returning to the road - however, it's easy enough to go ahead and turn and come back around in a pinch. It just seems a bit too passive to always be hugging the curb, no matter what, imo. On the incident, it's not clear if the riders were adequately lighted and vested. -B |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:04:31 -0400, "psycholist"
wrote: I don't live far from there. At 5:00 a.m. it's still pitch dark. The article doesn't speak to how the riders were dressed or if they had lights. I think the interpretation of the law saying they weren't sufficiently to the right is bogus given the presence of the turn lane. I also think that, generally, if you hit someone from behind, it's your fault. But in the pitch dark and not knowing about lighting, I don't think it's too safe to jump to any conclusions about this story. But I feel for the family and friends in their loss. Bob C. Jeeze, no ****e, if you hit someone from behind in my neck of the woods, you can believe it would be your fault. It's that old 'didn't see 'em' defense - mitigated, certainly if they were wearing no lights, no rear reflectors, no vests, etc. The article said: "Witnesses said Serrano had been bicycling at the left edge of the right-turn-only lane, bordering closely on the right lane of continuing traffic." There were 'witnesses' at 5:00am? Whoa. What about a statement from the other biker? Most experienced riders would be more-or-less hypervigilant at such problem points, imo. If indeed the law was to be at the right edge, then the riders were at the minus right edge, or left edge of the turn lane. I tend to doubt the 'drifted' into the thru lane witness accounts. Who would notice such a thing at 5:00am - "look, Hyram, that bicyclist is drifting...and...and...he's near invisible to the traffic behind him". Yeah. I'd be calling for an accident reconstruction analysis. Of course it's only a dayum biker. ;-( -B |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... Another example of why bicycle lanes are not always a good idea. They are placing blame on the cyclist because he was not in the bicycle lane. I wonder if the cyclist had a rear light and any kind of reflectors on them or the bike. Alex The article provided by the OP made no mention of a bicycle lane. It stated the investigating officer said no charges would be filed because cyclists are required to be on the right edge of the road. I'll bet he's wrong about the law. Cops are notorious for ignorance about rules of the road as they apply to cyclists. It sounds to me as though the rider was proceeding correctly, that is, on the right edge of the through lane. Whether or not he had lighting appropriate to the conditions is another story. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/25/2004 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The cop is wrong. You are required to be in the right of the lane you are
traveling in. In this case the street has one lane going straight in both directions and a right turn only lane for people going into a parking lot. In that situation you have to ride in the middle lane or you have to make a right turn. Moving over abruptly at the last minute would get you a ticket in a car. Scene of the crime: http://terraserver-usa.com/addressim...=34.0494990008 "Pete" wrote in message ... "Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... Another example of why bicycle lanes are not always a good idea. They are placing blame on the cyclist because he was not in the bicycle lane. I wonder if the cyclist had a rear light and any kind of reflectors on them or the bike. Alex The article provided by the OP made no mention of a bicycle lane. It stated the investigating officer said no charges would be filed because cyclists are required to be on the right edge of the road. I'll bet he's wrong about the law. Cops are notorious for ignorance about rules of the road as they apply to cyclists. It sounds to me as though the rider was proceeding correctly, that is, on the right edge of the through lane. Whether or not he had lighting appropriate to the conditions is another story. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/25/2004 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"psycholist" wrote in message
... I don't live far from there. At 5:00 a.m. it's still pitch dark. The article doesn't speak to how the riders were dressed or if they had lights. I think the interpretation of the law saying they weren't sufficiently to the right is bogus given the presence of the turn lane. I also think that, generally, if you hit someone from behind, it's your fault. But in the pitch dark and not knowing about lighting, I don't think it's too safe to jump to any conclusions about this story. But I feel for the family and friends in their loss. I went to the "scene" ... and talked with a cop about the accident. There were 150+ feet of skid marks, from a 45mph Prelude stopping, fishy!! ... also, the roadway is 55 not 45 ... the skids started in the turn lane ... a family has a great loss and there is a kid who has been confirmed that roadies are in his way, since he killed one and is getting off!! s http://boardnbike.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Pete" wrote in message
... The article provided by the OP made no mention of a bicycle lane. It stated the investigating officer said no charges would be filed because cyclists are required to be on the right edge of the road. I'll bet he's wrong about the law. Cops are notorious for ignorance about rules of the road as they apply to cyclists. It sounds to me as though the rider was proceeding correctly, that is, on the right edge of the through lane. Whether or not he had lighting appropriate to the conditions is another story. The county claims bike lines but as you can see from a follup posters link there is no striped bike lanes ... this is the actual scene: http://terraserver-usa.com/addressim...ee%2c+GA+30024 the skids started at the first drive (after impact, in the turn lane) and went to the second drive entrance. s http://boardnbike.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclist killed by lightning. | Simon Mason | UK | 13 | June 1st 04 04:59 PM |
Another Edinburgh cyclist killed | Mark Thompson | UK | 17 | February 18th 04 05:47 PM |
Ken Kifer -- "Identity of biker killed remains unclear" | Steven M. O'Neill | General | 5 | September 17th 03 06:01 PM |