|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On Jul 5, 6:58*am, Puppet_Sock wrote:
On Jul 3, 2:34*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Jun 27, 2:46*pm, Brad Anders wrote: On Jun 24, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: No, but you guys are in denial about the fact that I was innocent of all the charges. An "inconvenient truth", as Al Gore said. If you were "innocent of all the charges", why were you given probation? Because it's required by law. But we all know that juries frequently convict the innocent. Just look at the Innocence Project. Since mountain bikers lie all the time, and since Mikey lies all the time, Mikey must be a mountain biker. Socks I don't need to lie, because the truth is on my side. Mountain bikers lie because it's the only way they can attempt to justify their selfish, destructive, disgusting sport. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On 07/04/2011 09:47 PM, VtSkier wrote:
On 07/03/2011 09:55 AM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 02:34 AM, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Jun 27, 2:46 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 24, 11:09 pm, Mike wrote: No, but you guys are in denial about the fact that I was innocent of all the charges. An "inconvenient truth", as Al Gore said. If you were "innocent of all the charges", why were you given probation? Because it's required by law. But we all know that juries frequently convict the innocent. Just look at the Innocence Project. WHAAATTTTT??? Probation is part of sentence which you only get if you are GUILTY of something. It is NOT required by law that someone gets probation if they are "innocent of all charges". That's just plain bull****! Mr. Vandeman, please reply to my question and comment above and below: If you are "innocent of all charges" why was "probation" imposed? Your answer above makes no sense whatever. If you are "innocent of all charges" why was "probation" imposed? Your answer above makes no sense whatever. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On 7/4/2011 3:14 PM, Shraga wrote:
[...] Your "argument" is nothing more than a groundless childish protest of "AM NOT!"[...] That's not an argument, that's just contradiction! -- Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On 07/06/2011 03:38 PM, VtSkier wrote:
On 07/04/2011 09:47 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 09:55 AM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 02:34 AM, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Jun 27, 2:46 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 24, 11:09 pm, Mike wrote: No, but you guys are in denial about the fact that I was innocent of all the charges. An "inconvenient truth", as Al Gore said. If you were "innocent of all the charges", why were you given probation? Because it's required by law. But we all know that juries frequently convict the innocent. Just look at the Innocence Project. WHAAATTTTT??? Probation is part of sentence which you only get if you are GUILTY of something. It is NOT required by law that someone gets probation if they are "innocent of all charges". That's just plain bull****! Mr. Vandeman, please reply to my question and comment above and below: If you are "innocent of all charges" why was "probation" imposed? Your answer above makes no sense whatever. Mr. Vandespam, I challenge you to answer the question I have been asking. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On Jul 8, 6:41*am, VtSkier wrote:
On 07/06/2011 03:38 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/04/2011 09:47 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 09:55 AM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 02:34 AM, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Jun 27, 2:46 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 24, 11:09 pm, Mike wrote: No, but you guys are in denial about the fact that I was innocent of all the charges. An "inconvenient truth", as Al Gore said. If you were "innocent of all the charges", why were you given probation? Because it's required by law. But we all know that juries frequently convict the innocent. Just look at the Innocence Project. WHAAATTTTT??? Probation is part of sentence which you only get if you are GUILTY of something. It is NOT required by law that someone gets probation if they are "innocent of all charges". That's just plain bull****! Mr. Vandeman, please reply to my question and comment above and below: If you are "innocent of all charges" why was "probation" imposed? Your answer above makes no sense whatever. Mr. Vandespam, I challenge you to answer the question I have been asking. You will never get a straight, rational answer to any question - Mikey isn't capable of it. PMH |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On 07/08/2011 08:31 AM, PMH wrote:
On Jul 8, 6:41 am, wrote: On 07/06/2011 03:38 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/04/2011 09:47 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 09:55 AM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 02:34 AM, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Jun 27, 2:46 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 24, 11:09 pm, Mike wrote: No, but you guys are in denial about the fact that I was innocent of all the charges. An "inconvenient truth", as Al Gore said. If you were "innocent of all the charges", why were you given probation? Because it's required by law. But we all know that juries frequently convict the innocent. Just look at the Innocence Project. WHAAATTTTT??? Probation is part of sentence which you only get if you are GUILTY of something. It is NOT required by law that someone gets probation if they are "innocent of all charges". That's just plain bull****! Mr. Vandeman, please reply to my question and comment above and below: If you are "innocent of all charges" why was "probation" imposed? Your answer above makes no sense whatever. Mr. Vandespam, I challenge you to answer the question I have been asking. You will never get a straight, rational answer to any question - Mikey isn't capable of it. PMH However true that may be, he has not answered this question in ANY way no matter who has asked it except the the LIE he told above. Besides being an asshole, Mr. Vandespan is a LIAR! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On 7/8/2011 6:44 AM, VtSkier wrote:
Besides being an asshole, Mr. Vandespan is a LIAR! However he has succeeded in goading you to respond to him. Kill file him like most of us have done. He craves attention and you give it to him. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
"SMS" wrote in message
... On 7/8/2011 6:44 AM, VtSkier wrote: Besides being an asshole, Mr. Vandespan is a LIAR! However he has succeeded in goading you to respond to him. Kill file him like most of us have done. He craves attention and you give it to him. You do not understand the characteristics of the persona of these newsgroups. Only Ed Dolan the Great is allowed to call others ASSHOLES! Only Michael Vandeman is allowed to call others LIARS! Only Tom Sherman is allowed to mutter unintelligible things under his breath which only Ed Gin can appreciate! Glad I was able to enlighten you. -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On Jul 8, 3:41*am, VtSkier wrote:
On 07/06/2011 03:38 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/04/2011 09:47 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 09:55 AM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 02:34 AM, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Jun 27, 2:46 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 24, 11:09 pm, Mike wrote: No, but you guys are in denial about the fact that I was innocent of all the charges. An "inconvenient truth", as Al Gore said. If you were "innocent of all the charges", why were you given probation? Because it's required by law. But we all know that juries frequently convict the innocent. Just look at the Innocence Project. WHAAATTTTT??? Probation is part of sentence which you only get if you are GUILTY of something. It is NOT required by law that someone gets probation if they are "innocent of all charges". That's just plain bull****! Mr. Vandeman, please reply to my question and comment above and below: If you are "innocent of all charges" why was "probation" imposed? Your answer above makes no sense whatever. I was convicted of something I didn't do. It happens all the time. Never heard of the "Innocence Project"? Mountain bikers are AMAZINGLY ignorant and dishonest. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Great News! ZERO Support for washed-up criminal
On Jul 10, 3:22*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Jul 8, 3:41*am, VtSkier wrote: On 07/06/2011 03:38 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/04/2011 09:47 PM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 09:55 AM, VtSkier wrote: On 07/03/2011 02:34 AM, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Jun 27, 2:46 pm, Brad wrote: On Jun 24, 11:09 pm, Mike wrote: No, but you guys are in denial about the fact that I was innocent of all the charges. An "inconvenient truth", as Al Gore said. If you were "innocent of all the charges", why were you given probation? Because it's required by law. But we all know that juries frequently convict the innocent. Just look at the Innocence Project. WHAAATTTTT??? Probation is part of sentence which you only get if you are GUILTY of something. It is NOT required by law that someone gets probation if they are "innocent of all charges". That's just plain bull****! Mr. Vandeman, please reply to my question and comment above and below: If you are "innocent of all charges" why was "probation" imposed? Your answer above makes no sense whatever. I was convicted of something I didn't do. It happens all the time. Never heard of the "Innocence Project"? Mountain bikers are AMAZINGLY ignorant and dishonest. Did you enjoy the jail food? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Biking in the Rocky Mountain National Park??? | Fer | General | 4 | November 4th 07 02:06 PM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 8 | March 18th 07 06:24 AM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 6 | March 16th 07 03:35 AM |
Biking Newport News Park Bikeway/Yorktown Battlefield VA | Cathy Gale | General | 1 | June 19th 05 01:45 PM |