|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
I had a bit of road rubbish flick up and dent the underside of the down
tube on my new road bike. (It's only done 45,000km). The dent was probably 2-3mm deep, and had damaged the paint. There were a few other scratches here and there, so I gave it a birthday, and had the dent pulled out and the frame resprayed. In the down time, I completed building a training bike I'd started a year ago. A 20 year old custom 853 lugged racing frame, with the same wheels as my new bike. The major difference is the frame tube diameter. The old frame having the customary 1" tubes, where as the new bike frame has 1 1/8" and 1 1/4" oversize tubes. I rode 166km on Saturday on the old bike, and then last night, 60km on the new bike. The difference in the way they ride is very obvious. The old bike feels like a soft spring when I stand on the pedals, and I can watch the chain rings wobble around while I pedal hard, even seated. The new bike feels crisp and zippy underneath me. It feels like every ounce of effort going into the pedals gets translated to the back wheel and on to the road. With the old bike I had to have the rear brake blocks set quite a distance off the rim, or they would rub. On the new bike I can have them set quite close for nice operation. The same modulus of elasticity (both steel), but the stiffness due to the oversize tubes makes a world of difference. -- JS |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
James wrote:
:The same modulus of elasticity (both steel), but the stiffness due to :the oversize tubes makes a world of difference. But narrow tubes were good enough for jesus, why shouldn't they be for you? -- sig 79 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:00:20 +1000, James wrote:
The major difference is the frame tube diameter. The old frame having the customary 1" tubes, where as the new bike frame has 1 1/8" and 1 1/4" oversize tubes. I rode 166km on Saturday on the old bike, and then last night, 60km on the new bike. The difference in the way they ride is very obvious. The old bike feels like a soft spring when I stand on the pedals, and I can watch the chain rings wobble around while I pedal hard, even seated. The new bike feels crisp and zippy underneath me. It feels like every ounce of effort going into the pedals gets translated to the back wheel and on to the road. With the old bike I had to have the rear brake blocks set quite a distance off the rim, or they would rub. On the new bike I can have them set quite close for nice operation. The same modulus of elasticity (both steel), but the stiffness due to the oversize tubes makes a world of difference. Plus c,a change... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
when you come across a Panasonic...reaction ?
then a Fisher.... Its like okra..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
On 8/11/2014 11:00 PM, James wrote:
I had a bit of road rubbish flick up and dent the underside of the down tube on my new road bike. (It's only done 45,000km). The dent was probably 2-3mm deep, and had damaged the paint. There were a few other scratches here and there, so I gave it a birthday, and had the dent pulled out and the frame resprayed. I'm curious about getting the dent pulled out. How did they do that? In the down time, I completed building a training bike I'd started a year ago. A 20 year old custom 853 lugged racing frame, with the same wheels as my new bike. The major difference is the frame tube diameter. The old frame having the customary 1" tubes, where as the new bike frame has 1 1/8" and 1 1/4" oversize tubes. I rode 166km on Saturday on the old bike, and then last night, 60km on the new bike. The difference in the way they ride is very obvious. The old bike feels like a soft spring when I stand on the pedals, and I can watch the chain rings wobble around while I pedal hard, even seated. The new bike feels crisp and zippy underneath me. It feels like every ounce of effort going into the pedals gets translated to the back wheel and on to the road.... I prefer a stiff frame, too. But I note that Jan Heine, who (almost single-handedly) publishes _Bicycle Quarterly_, likes a certain amount of flex. He claims the flex somehow allows the bike to synchronize with his pedal strokes (or something). He calls the action "planing," as when certain types of power boats skim the surface, rather than floating. Hard to tell if it's imaginary or not. His magazine has some interesting tests and data from time to time, but his road tests greatly emphasize how a bike feels to him - as is usually the case with road tests. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
On 8/12/2014 10:22 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 8/11/2014 11:00 PM, James wrote: I had a bit of road rubbish flick up and dent the underside of the down tube on my new road bike. (It's only done 45,000km). The dent was probably 2-3mm deep, and had damaged the paint. There were a few other scratches here and there, so I gave it a birthday, and had the dent pulled out and the frame resprayed. I'm curious about getting the dent pulled out. How did they do that? In the down time, I completed building a training bike I'd started a year ago. A 20 year old custom 853 lugged racing frame, with the same wheels as my new bike. The major difference is the frame tube diameter. The old frame having the customary 1" tubes, where as the new bike frame has 1 1/8" and 1 1/4" oversize tubes. I rode 166km on Saturday on the old bike, and then last night, 60km on the new bike. The difference in the way they ride is very obvious. The old bike feels like a soft spring when I stand on the pedals, and I can watch the chain rings wobble around while I pedal hard, even seated. The new bike feels crisp and zippy underneath me. It feels like every ounce of effort going into the pedals gets translated to the back wheel and on to the road.... I prefer a stiff frame, too. But I note that Jan Heine, who (almost single-handedly) publishes _Bicycle Quarterly_, likes a certain amount of flex. He claims the flex somehow allows the bike to synchronize with his pedal strokes (or something). He calls the action "planing," as when certain types of power boats skim the surface, rather than floating. Hard to tell if it's imaginary or not. His magazine has some interesting tests and data from time to time, but his road tests greatly emphasize how a bike feels to him - as is usually the case with road tests. I'm curious about getting the dent pulled out. How did they do that? wires and mirror mostly http://www.yellowjersey.org/borga.html In Indonesia they lift auto body dents by summoning spirits without damaging the paint. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
awwww Frank
with a dent puller |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
Ima Volvo owner
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The difference tube diameter makes
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:55:23 PM UTC-4, AMuzi wrote:
On 8/12/2014 10:22 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 8/11/2014 11:00 PM, James wrote: I had a bit of road rubbish flick up and dent the underside of the down tube on my new road bike. (It's only done 45,000km). The dent was probably 2-3mm deep, and had damaged the paint. There were a few other scratches here and there, so I gave it a birthday, and had the dent pulled out and the frame resprayed. I'm curious about getting the dent pulled out. How did they do that? In the down time, I completed building a training bike I'd started a year ago. A 20 year old custom 853 lugged racing frame, with the same wheels as my new bike. The major difference is the frame tube diameter. The old frame having the customary 1" tubes, where as the new bike frame has 1 1/8" and 1 1/4" oversize tubes. I rode 166km on Saturday on the old bike, and then last night, 60km on the new bike. The difference in the way they ride is very obvious. The old bike feels like a soft spring when I stand on the pedals, and I can watch the chain rings wobble around while I pedal hard, even seated. The new bike feels crisp and zippy underneath me. It feels like every ounce of effort going into the pedals gets translated to the back wheel and on to the road.... I prefer a stiff frame, too. But I note that Jan Heine, who (almost single-handedly) publishes _Bicycle Quarterly_, likes a certain amount of flex. He claims the flex somehow allows the bike to synchronize with his pedal strokes (or something). He calls the action "planing," as when certain types of power boats skim the surface, rather than floating. Hard to tell if it's imaginary or not. His magazine has some interesting tests and data from time to time, but his road tests greatly emphasize how a bike feels to him - as is usually the case with road tests. I'm curious about getting the dent pulled out. How did they do that? wires and mirror mostly http://www.yellowjersey.org/borga.html In Indonesia they lift auto body dents by summoning spirits without damaging the paint. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnuck magnificent...you should find a job in a bicycle shop... tellus, how did the Waterford dent ? Replaced the van's driver's side sill at ungh$ last week... ran over the OEM... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What a difference a day makes | Robert Chung | Racing | 7 | June 29th 07 01:00 PM |
what a difference it makes | zachjowi | Unicycling | 12 | August 2nd 06 09:27 AM |
The difference a day makes... | Human powered | Racing | 4 | July 21st 05 07:03 AM |
What a difference a Race makes | matabala | Racing | 0 | June 13th 05 06:43 PM |
What a difference a day makes... | Mark Tranchant | UK | 7 | January 13th 05 12:03 AM |