|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
OK, I've *tried* to soak up all the knowledge I can without bugging you
guys too much, but I just recieved my new brakes today and really want to get in at least one decent ride this weekend, so here goes. These are Tektro Oryx cantilevers, going on an 05 Cannondale CX with the stock carbon fiber fork. These should be the same model brakes that the bike originally came with, although I assume that they may have been revised over the past few years. 1) when I attempt to install the cantilevers on the bosses on the fork, there is a gap of about 3/32" between the brake and the flat part of the boss. Is this OK? I tried tightening it down with one of the old bolts but it didn't move any with what I felt was a reasonable amount of torque - in fact with the bolt tight it felt solidly mounted, just had that unsightly gap. Is this OK? 2) I've seen references to "toe in" when setting the pads but the concept is still unclear to me exactly what it's referring to - does this mean that I should set the pad so that the leading edge or front (of the bike) surface of the pad should contact the rim slightly before the rear? thanks again... nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
On Apr 18, 4:00*pm, Nate Nagel wrote:
OK, I've *tried* to soak up all the knowledge I can without bugging you guys too much, but I just recieved my new brakes today and really want to get in at least one decent ride this weekend, so here goes. *These are Tektro Oryx cantilevers, going on an 05 Cannondale CX with the stock carbon fiber fork. *These should be the same model brakes that the bike originally came with, although I assume that they may have been revised over the past few years. 1) when I attempt to install the cantilevers on the bosses on the fork, there is a gap of about 3/32" between the brake and the flat part of the boss. *Is this OK? *I tried tightening it down with one of the old bolts but it didn't move any with what I felt was a reasonable amount of torque - in fact with the bolt tight it felt solidly mounted, just had that unsightly gap. *Is this OK? 2) I've seen references to "toe in" when setting the pads but the concept is still unclear to me exactly what it's referring to - does this mean that I should set the pad so that the leading edge or front (of the bike) surface of the pad should contact the rim slightly before the rear? thanks again... nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.http://members.cox.net/njnagel Yes and yes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
On Apr 18, 6:00 pm, Nate Nagel wrote:
2) I've seen references to "toe in" when setting the pads but the concept is still unclear to me exactly what it's referring to - does this mean that I should set the pad so that the leading edge or front (of the bike) surface of the pad should contact the rim slightly before the rear? yeah, because the force of braking will pull and twist the pad and arm a bit. If you don't have toe in, you can get chatter and squeal. A fat postal rubber band around the back part of the pad is a good way to estimate the toe in when snugging things up. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
landotter wrote:
On Apr 18, 6:00 pm, Nate Nagel wrote: 2) I've seen references to "toe in" when setting the pads but the concept is still unclear to me exactly what it's referring to - does this mean that I should set the pad so that the leading edge or front (of the bike) surface of the pad should contact the rim slightly before the rear? yeah, because the force of braking will pull and twist the pad and arm a bit. If you don't have toe in, you can get chatter and squeal. A fat postal rubber band around the back part of the pad is a good way to estimate the toe in when snugging things up. Thanks for the tip, that makes a lot of sense. Sounds easier than trying to snug it up with the brakes released. nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
Nate Nagel wrote:
landotter wrote: On Apr 18, 6:00 pm, Nate Nagel wrote: 2) I've seen references to "toe in" when setting the pads but the concept is still unclear to me exactly what it's referring to - does this mean that I should set the pad so that the leading edge or front (of the bike) surface of the pad should contact the rim slightly before the rear? yeah, because the force of braking will pull and twist the pad and arm a bit. If you don't have toe in, you can get chatter and squeal. A fat postal rubber band around the back part of the pad is a good way to estimate the toe in when snugging things up. Thanks for the tip, that makes a lot of sense. Sounds easier than trying to snug it up with the brakes released. nate I just realized that i phrased my original question badly, such that I am still confused even given your answer - which end of the pad do I want to contact the rim first? 1) the leading edge - which would be the *rear* of the pad or 2) the actual *front* of the pad? or does it not really matter, just that the pad should not contact the rim squarely? Only reason I am making such a big deal about it was that the old pads were worn flat and had a SEVERE squeak, and I'd like to solve several different problems all at once here. I may just run the bike up to LBS in the morning anyway as I need some ferrules, adjuster barrels, etc. to make this all right and the guy may be able to set it up quickly and inexpensively, who knows. Doesn't hurt to ask. The LBS with all the shiny new stuff is a couple miles away, but I have one close enough that i can even carry the bike on my shoulder that far, and that may be the better place for this kind of issue anyway, it's sort of a hole in the wall with all sorts of crap all over the place and tons of parts bikes piled up out back. nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
On Apr 18, 10:38 pm, Nate Nagel wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote: landotter wrote: On Apr 18, 6:00 pm, Nate Nagel wrote: 2) I've seen references to "toe in" when setting the pads but the concept is still unclear to me exactly what it's referring to - does this mean that I should set the pad so that the leading edge or front (of the bike) surface of the pad should contact the rim slightly before the rear? yeah, because the force of braking will pull and twist the pad and arm a bit. If you don't have toe in, you can get chatter and squeal. A fat postal rubber band around the back part of the pad is a good way to estimate the toe in when snugging things up. Thanks for the tip, that makes a lot of sense. Sounds easier than trying to snug it up with the brakes released. nate I just realized that i phrased my original question badly, such that I am still confused even given your answer - which end of the pad do I want to contact the rim first? Think about how the brake is going to be torqued--it will be pulled forward, so the front bit needs to be a couple mm's closer. Upon hard braking, the pads will be deformed and pulled parallel to the rim. Toe in not only helps squeal and noise, but done properly really affects the ability to modulate, IMO. When you've worn your pads down a bit after a few months, you can swap them from side to side if the wear is slightly diagonal, BTW. Go to parktool.com for further info. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
On Apr 18, 8:38 pm, Nate Nagel wrote:
The LBS with all the shiny new stuff is a couple miles away, but I have one close enough that i can even carry the bike on my shoulder that far, and that may be the better place for this kind of issue anyway, it's sort of a hole in the wall with all sorts of crap all over the place and tons of parts bikes piled up out back. I love shops like that. I worked at one all through high school. Before it was a bike shop, it was a hardware store, so we still had brass pipe fittings, a paint shaker, and I'm pretty sure we were the only bike shop in town that could duplicate keys while you wait. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
Hank wrote:
On Apr 18, 8:38 pm, Nate Nagel wrote: The LBS with all the shiny new stuff is a couple miles away, but I have one close enough that i can even carry the bike on my shoulder that far, and that may be the better place for this kind of issue anyway, it's sort of a hole in the wall with all sorts of crap all over the place and tons of parts bikes piled up out back. I love shops like that. I worked at one all through high school. Before it was a bike shop, it was a hardware store, so we still had brass pipe fittings, a paint shaker, and I'm pretty sure we were the only bike shop in town that could duplicate keys while you wait. I didn't mean that in a bad way, I feel the same way about auto parts stores. I hate new parts stores where the kid behind the counter only knows how to look stuff up in a computer. Sample conversation: Me: Do you have any Champion RJ12YCs or Autolite 437s? Counter guy: What kind of car do you have? Me: It's a '55 Studebaker Commander, but the engine is out of a '63 Avanti. Counter guy: Studebaker? Who made that? Me: (facepalm) Give me a store with creaky wood floors and some crusty old guy smoking a cigarette behind the counter any day. nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
On Apr 19, 1:59*pm, Nate Nagel wrote:
Give me a store with creaky wood floors and some crusty old guy smoking a cigarette behind the counter any day. Was at a car dealer a few weeks ago buying brake adjusters. The kid behind the counter did an ok job as it was pretty straight forward. Type in my chassis number, and drill down to brake parts. Get a part- number, get a bin number, and a price. Then a crusty old guy with a cigarette behind his ear suggested he punch in a different year and body style, skipping the chassis number. After the drill-down, same part-number, same bin, different cheaper price. I think the floor was wood, but it was hard to see it through the grime. Cigarette man gave me a wink, and I was on my way. Joseph |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
installin mah brakes
On Apr 19, 2:22*am, landotter wrote:
On Apr 18, 6:00 pm, Nate Nagel wrote: 2) I've seen references to "toe in" when setting the pads but the concept is still unclear to me exactly what it's referring to - does this mean that I should set the pad so that the leading edge or front (of the bike) surface of the pad should contact the rim slightly before the rear? yeah, because the force of braking will pull and twist the pad and arm a bit. If you don't have toe in, you can get chatter and squeal. A fat postal rubber band around the back part of the pad is a good way to estimate the toe in when snugging things up. I use skinny coins at the rear of the pad and just clamp the whole thing against the rim with one hand, and tighten with the other. That keeps the pads nice and square to the rim. Joseph |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Generic Brakes vs Dura-Ace 7700 brakes ? | RS | Techniques | 19 | June 10th 06 01:30 AM |
Might Dump Road Disc Brakes for Rim Brakes | mykal | Techniques | 24 | July 7th 05 05:48 PM |
'V' Brakes vs Mechanical Disc Brakes | Ian Brown | Mountain Biking | 14 | May 31st 04 08:09 PM |
change cantilever brakes to V brakes | David Wood | UK | 6 | November 24th 03 12:56 PM |
disc brakes on front, v-brakes on rear | Per Elmsäter | Mountain Biking | 24 | October 21st 03 10:42 PM |