|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#721
|
|||
|
|||
TWO o'clock in the Morning in Australia - and Senile Rot is already up and Trolling! LMAO!
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 02:12:09 +1000, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: FLUSH usual senile **** Is your senility not letting you sleep in again, you abnormal cantankerous senile geezer? Or don't you want to miss the ONLY "conversations" that you still can have in your quickly ending senile life? BG -- Bill Wright addressing senile Ozzie cretin Rot Speed: "Well you make up a lot of stuff and it's total ******** most of it." MID: |
Ads |
#722
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 04:16:23 +0100, rbowman wrote:
On 10/02/2018 05:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:26:26 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/30/2018 10:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:12:20 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/10/2018 12:53 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Are your roads littered with speed bumps? I go over perhaps 200 a day. That cinches it. No trip to the UK for me. Some of our dirt roads have speed bumps, aka small boulders, but I've never seen them other than on private roads. Round here they put them in the stupidest of places, for example 10 yards from a junction, where nobody could possibly be speeding anyway. And apparently they cost £10,000 each to install including paperwork. We have various 'traffic calming' schemes like roundabouts and bulbouts but speed bumps would really **** off the snowplow crews to say nothing of the cops. Even some of the semi-private areas are getting rid of them. I hit one of the damn things on my bicycle. The sun was in my eyes and I didn't see it coming so I taco'd my front wheel and did a face plant. I was not happy. You should have attempted to sue the council (or whatever you call them over there). Causing injury to a cyclist can't be allowed surely? I hope I one day catch an old lady tripping over one on my dashcam. I've seen it happen before, a pensioner crosses the road and trips on the stupid thing. But I need proof. Further north, they have bollards on the narrowing things (we call them chicanes, Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicane I assume that's what you refer to as a bulbout). Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_extension https://missoulian.com/news/local/bi...cc4c03286.html These are the worst of both. The theory is pedestrians will be out in the street, visible, and have a shorter path. They suck for bicycles since you're forced out in the traffic lane, and are difficult for trucks and buses to navigate. There are also micro-roundabouts. Basically you take a 4-way intersection of residential streets, build a little round island in the middle, and plant flowers. The first moving van in the area runs over the thing since it's impossible to navigate around it with anything bigger than a mini-van. ROTFPMSL! The EU strikes again! We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, contact or call 866-839-6397. |
#723
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 06:47:20 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"rbowman" wrote in message ... On 10/02/2018 05:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:26:26 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/30/2018 10:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:12:20 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/10/2018 12:53 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Are your roads littered with speed bumps? I go over perhaps 200 a day. That cinches it. No trip to the UK for me. Some of our dirt roads have speed bumps, aka small boulders, but I've never seen them other than on private roads. Round here they put them in the stupidest of places, for example 10 yards from a junction, where nobody could possibly be speeding anyway. And apparently they cost £10,000 each to install including paperwork. We have various 'traffic calming' schemes like roundabouts and bulbouts but speed bumps would really **** off the snowplow crews to say nothing of the cops. Even some of the semi-private areas are getting rid of them. I hit one of the damn things on my bicycle. The sun was in my eyes and I didn't see it coming so I taco'd my front wheel and did a face plant. I was not happy. You should have attempted to sue the council (or whatever you call them over there). Causing injury to a cyclist can't be allowed surely? I hope I one day catch an old lady tripping over one on my dashcam. I've seen it happen before, a pensioner crosses the road and trips on the stupid thing. But I need proof. Further north, they have bollards on the narrowing things (we call them chicanes, Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicane I assume that's what you refer to as a bulbout). Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_extension https://missoulian.com/news/local/bi...cc4c03286.html These are the worst of both. The theory is pedestrians will be out in the street, visible, and have a shorter path. Yeah, we have those outside one of our primary/grade schools. They suck for bicycles since you're forced out in the traffic lane, and are difficult for trucks and buses to navigate. There are also micro-roundabouts. Basically you take a 4-way intersection of residential streets, build a little round island in the middle, Yeah, we have lots of those. and plant flowers. Nothing in the middle with ours, only with the big ones. The first moving van in the area runs over the thing since it's impossible to navigate around it with anything bigger than a mini-van. Ours are low enough so that trucks and vans can just drive of them, with a shallow curb so they don't even have to slow down to do that. I drive over a lot of them with my car. Not sure if I damage the suspension more doing that than I would damage the steering by swerving round the ****ing things. But the main thing is I damage the stupid thing on the road. Where lots of people have done it, they sink due to all the knocks they get. |
#724
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:01:14 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:26:26 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/30/2018 10:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:12:20 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/10/2018 12:53 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Are your roads littered with speed bumps? I go over perhaps 200 a day. That cinches it. No trip to the UK for me. Some of our dirt roads have speed bumps, aka small boulders, but I've never seen them other than on private roads. Round here they put them in the stupidest of places, for example 10 yards from a junction, where nobody could possibly be speeding anyway. And apparently they cost £10,000 each to install including paperwork. We have various 'traffic calming' schemes like roundabouts and bulbouts but speed bumps would really **** off the snowplow crews to say nothing of the cops. Even some of the semi-private areas are getting rid of them. I hit one of the damn things on my bicycle. The sun was in my eyes and I didn't see it coming so I taco'd my front wheel and did a face plant. I was not happy. You should have attempted to sue the council (or whatever you call them over there). Causing injury to a cyclist can't be allowed surely? I hope I one day catch an old lady tripping over one on my dashcam. I've seen it happen before, a pensioner crosses the road and trips on the stupid thing. But I need proof. Further north, they have bollards on the narrowing things (we call them chicanes, Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicane I assume that's what you refer to as a bulbout). Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_extension We seem to have halfway between. They mean that pedestrians are stood directly in front of oncoming traffic which has to swerve round them. A monumentally stupid idea. |
#725
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:14:11 +0100, rbowman wrote:
On 10/02/2018 11:47 PM, Rod Speed wrote: Ours are low enough so that trucks and vans can just drive of them, with a shallow curb so they don't even have to slow down to do that. The larger ones have a concrete apron for that purpose. The tiny ones were constructed without thinking that something like a moving van might need to navigate them. Many drivers haven't figured out how they work yet. We have many four way stops where people take turns in an orderly fashion. They tend to take roundabouts the same, stopping before entering even if the way is clear, which defeats the purpose. There's a street near here with literally THIRTY speedbumps, and I mean the big full length ones right across the road. Even driving at the speed limit in a car, you get jolted about and a lot of cars (including almost new ones) scrape their undersides. I watched a bus go along the street, and the driver was very annoyed, he was accelerating then braking for each one, and all the passengers were being jolted everywhere. An ambulance would take an extra 5 minutes to get along the street. |
#726
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:12:09 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
rbowman wrote Rod Speed wrote Ours are low enough so that trucks and vans can just drive over them, with a shallow curb so they don't even have to slow down to do that. The larger ones have a concrete apron for that purpose. The tiny ones were constructed without thinking that something like a moving van might need to navigate them. Ours are fine for that, those and semis can drive right over them as if they arent there. There is nothing but concrete in the middle. Can't actually find a street view of one, our street view is 8 years old now. Many drivers haven't figured out how they work yet. We have many four way stops where people take turns in an orderly fashion. We don't have any of those, one of the two roads at that intersection always has giveway signs on one of the roads. They tend to take roundabouts the same, stopping before entering even if the way is clear, which defeats the purpose. We don't see that at all, presumably because we don't have any intersections which don't have giveways on one road. Some of our chicanes/bulbouts have bollards on them to stop people doing that, but people have discovered they're just hollow plastic and driven straight through them, smashing the stupid things to pieces. |
#727
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 06:47:20 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "rbowman" wrote in message ... On 10/02/2018 05:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:26:26 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/30/2018 10:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:12:20 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/10/2018 12:53 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Are your roads littered with speed bumps? I go over perhaps 200 a day. That cinches it. No trip to the UK for me. Some of our dirt roads have speed bumps, aka small boulders, but I've never seen them other than on private roads. Round here they put them in the stupidest of places, for example 10 yards from a junction, where nobody could possibly be speeding anyway. And apparently they cost £10,000 each to install including paperwork. We have various 'traffic calming' schemes like roundabouts and bulbouts but speed bumps would really **** off the snowplow crews to say nothing of the cops. Even some of the semi-private areas are getting rid of them. I hit one of the damn things on my bicycle. The sun was in my eyes and I didn't see it coming so I taco'd my front wheel and did a face plant. I was not happy. You should have attempted to sue the council (or whatever you call them over there). Causing injury to a cyclist can't be allowed surely? I hope I one day catch an old lady tripping over one on my dashcam. I've seen it happen before, a pensioner crosses the road and trips on the stupid thing. But I need proof. Further north, they have bollards on the narrowing things (we call them chicanes, Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicane I assume that's what you refer to as a bulbout). Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_extension https://missoulian.com/news/local/bi...cc4c03286.html These are the worst of both. The theory is pedestrians will be out in the street, visible, and have a shorter path. Yeah, we have those outside one of our primary/grade schools. They suck for bicycles since you're forced out in the traffic lane, and are difficult for trucks and buses to navigate. There are also micro-roundabouts. Basically you take a 4-way intersection of residential streets, build a little round island in the middle, Yeah, we have lots of those. and plant flowers. Nothing in the middle with ours, only with the big ones. The first moving van in the area runs over the thing since it's impossible to navigate around it with anything bigger than a mini-van. Ours are low enough so that trucks and vans can just drive of them, with a shallow curb so they don't even have to slow down to do that. I drive over a lot of them with my car. I don't, but that's because I don't want to lose more demerit points and have to walk instead of drive. Its easy enough to stay on the road itself and I mostly don't go straight thru most of our smallest roundabouts anyway. Not sure if I damage the suspension more doing that than I would damage the steering by swerving round the ****ing things. No need to swerve and that doesn't damage the steering anyway. But the main thing is I damage the stupid thing on the road. Doesn't damage ours, even when you drive over it with a fully loaded semi what you lot call an HGV. Where lots of people have done it, they sink due to all the knocks they get. Ours don't. Unfortunately all our smallest roundabouts have been done since our last street view so I can't show you easily. |
#728
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:01:14 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:26:26 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/30/2018 10:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:12:20 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 09/10/2018 12:53 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Are your roads littered with speed bumps? I go over perhaps 200 a day. That cinches it. No trip to the UK for me. Some of our dirt roads have speed bumps, aka small boulders, but I've never seen them other than on private roads. Round here they put them in the stupidest of places, for example 10 yards from a junction, where nobody could possibly be speeding anyway. And apparently they cost £10,000 each to install including paperwork. We have various 'traffic calming' schemes like roundabouts and bulbouts but speed bumps would really **** off the snowplow crews to say nothing of the cops. Even some of the semi-private areas are getting rid of them. I hit one of the damn things on my bicycle. The sun was in my eyes and I didn't see it coming so I taco'd my front wheel and did a face plant. I was not happy. You should have attempted to sue the council (or whatever you call them over there). Causing injury to a cyclist can't be allowed surely? I hope I one day catch an old lady tripping over one on my dashcam. I've seen it happen before, a pensioner crosses the road and trips on the stupid thing. But I need proof. Further north, they have bollards on the narrowing things (we call them chicanes, Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicane I assume that's what you refer to as a bulbout). Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_extension We seem to have halfway between. Give us a street view of one of them. They mean that pedestrians are stood directly in front of oncoming traffic which has to swerve round them. Ours have massive concrete things on the road which means that no one ever drives there. https://goo.gl/maps/HGqk3Uqxfns A monumentally stupid idea. Sounds like it. |
#729
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:14:11 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 10/02/2018 11:47 PM, Rod Speed wrote: Ours are low enough so that trucks and vans can just drive of them, with a shallow curb so they don't even have to slow down to do that. The larger ones have a concrete apron for that purpose. The tiny ones were constructed without thinking that something like a moving van might need to navigate them. Many drivers haven't figured out how they work yet. We have many four way stops where people take turns in an orderly fashion. They tend to take roundabouts the same, stopping before entering even if the way is clear, which defeats the purpose. There's a street near here with literally THIRTY speedbumps, and I mean the big full length ones right across the road. Even driving at the speed limit in a car, you get jolted about and a lot of cars (including almost new ones) scrape their undersides. I watched a bus go along the street, and the driver was very annoyed, he was accelerating then braking for each one, and all the passengers were being jolted everywhere. An ambulance would take an extra 5 minutes to get along the street. Give us a street view. The worst of ours is down the main street and that's only got about 5 and no one scrapes going over them and you don't have to slow down that much only to say 20Kmph and the traffic isnt going at the legal 50 there anyway except at say 6am etc. Again, the street view is to old to show any of them. |
#730
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists waste petrol
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:12:09 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: rbowman wrote Rod Speed wrote Ours are low enough so that trucks and vans can just drive over them, with a shallow curb so they don't even have to slow down to do that. The larger ones have a concrete apron for that purpose. The tiny ones were constructed without thinking that something like a moving van might need to navigate them. Ours are fine for that, those and semis can drive right over them as if they arent there. There is nothing but concrete in the middle. Can't actually find a street view of one, our street view is 8 years old now. Many drivers haven't figured out how they work yet. We have many four way stops where people take turns in an orderly fashion. We don't have any of those, one of the two roads at that intersection always has giveway signs on one of the roads. They tend to take roundabouts the same, stopping before entering even if the way is clear, which defeats the purpose. We don't see that at all, presumably because we don't have any intersections which don't have giveways on one road. Some of our chicanes/bulbouts have bollards on them to stop people doing that, but people have discovered they're just hollow plastic and driven straight through them, smashing the stupid things to pieces. We do have some of those, mostly to stop people driving along the footpaths in the big parks, but they are solid concrete so no one tries to take them out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This is what cyclists waste tax payers' money on | James Wilkinson Sword[_4_] | UK | 123 | February 12th 17 10:08 PM |
Another waste of effort | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 2 | September 21st 11 09:56 AM |
So here is some total waste | Anton Berlin | Racing | 6 | August 4th 09 05:05 AM |
Wot a waste | [email protected] | UK | 11 | February 28th 08 08:24 AM |
Probably a waste of my time but its my time to waste | Jeff Grippe | Recumbent Biking | 78 | January 17th 07 11:30 PM |