No Fuel Shortages Or Bottlenecks Evacuating By Bicycle

I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula. They
have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma.

Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an area
where hurricanes are a regular occurrence.

What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico
and the Carribean?

It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it?

I said those who "choose" to.

The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central
American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida,
Georgia and the Carolinas?

What, ALL of them?

Can you not understand the word "choose"?
Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area to
live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain for
your home?
There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax
avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up
any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose*
to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are.


You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the
Gulf. And their reasons for living there.

Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the
word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live.
This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not*
have a *choice*.
People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal
hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers.

On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote:

I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula.
They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma.

Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an
area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence.

What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico
and the Carribean?

It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it?

I said those who "choose" to.

The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central
American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas?

What, ALL of them?

Can you not understand the word "choose"?
Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area
to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain
for your home?
There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax
avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up
any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose*
to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they are.


You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the
Gulf. And their reasons for living there.

Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the
word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live.
This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not*
have a *choice*.
People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal
hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers.

Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*,
ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to
move to a safer district.

On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote:

I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula.
They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma.

Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an
area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence.

What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico
and the Carribean?

It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it?

I said those who "choose" to.

The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central
American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas?

What, ALL of them?

Can you not understand the word "choose"?
Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area
to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain
for your home?
There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax
avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up
any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose*
to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they
are.


You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the
Gulf. And their reasons for living there.
*
Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the
word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live.
This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not*
have a *choice*.
People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal
hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers.

Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*,
ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to
move to a safer district.

They can walk!

You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford move, walking
won't help them.

On 08/09/2017 15:39, Bod wrote:
On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote:

I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula.
They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma.

Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an
area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence.

What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of Mexico
and the Carribean?

It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it?

I said those who "choose" to.

The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the Central
American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas?

What, ALL of them?

Can you not understand the word "choose"?
Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area
to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain
for your home?
There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax
avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to drum up
any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who *choose*
to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they
are.


You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the
Gulf. And their reasons for living there.
*
Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the
word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live.
This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not*
have a *choice*.
People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal
hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers.

Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*,
ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to
move to a safer district.

They can walk!

You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford to move, walking
won't help them.

*correction* "afford *to* move".

On 08/09/2017 15:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:39:11 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote:

I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula.
They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma.

Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an
area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence.

What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of
Mexico
and the Carribean?

It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it?

I said those who "choose" to.

The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the
Central
American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas?

What, ALL of them?

Can you not understand the word "choose"?
Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area
to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain
for your home?
There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax
avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to
drum up
any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who
*choose*
to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they
are.


You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the
Gulf. And their reasons for living there.
*
Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the
word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live.
This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not*
have a *choice*.
People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal
hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers.

Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*,
ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the
means to
move to a safer district.

They can walk!

You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford move, walking
won't help them.

Moving isn't expensive if you do it yourself.

Most indigenous people on those islands only have shacks.

On 08/09/2017 15:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:40:45 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 08/09/2017 15:39, Bod wrote:
On 08/09/2017 15:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 08/09/2017 14:32, Bod wrote:

I have a friend on the Gulf of Mexico side of the peninsula.
They have 500 mies to drive to be safe from Irma.

Quite a job on a bike, as I'm sure you will agree.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

I doubt the intelligence of people who *choose* to live in an
area where hurricanes are a regular occurrence.

What, the WHOLE of the sub-tropical area around the Gulf of
Mexico
and the Carribean?

It should be unpopulated wilderness, should it?

I said those who "choose" to.

The whole of the population of the Caribbean, Mexico and the
Central
American states, plus Texas, Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas?

What, ALL of them?

Can you not understand the word "choose"?
Are you silly enough to want to move to a well known hurricane area
to live? Perhaps you would prefer to choose a home on a flood plain
for your home?
There are many that choose to live in these volatile areas for tax
avoidance reasons, ie..greed, in which case I find it hard to
drum up
any sympathy for them. The same applies to the thousands who
*choose*
to go on holiday in the hurricane seasons. Fools, that's what they
are.


You have the weirdest of ideas about the people who live around the
Gulf. And their reasons for living there.
*
Oh dear, you have a comprehension problem. Let me try to simplify the
word *choose*; *choose* means you have a *choice* where to live.
This discludes people who cannot *choose*, meaning that they do *not*
have a *choice*.
People who *choose* to live in an area where they have seasonal
hurricanes are either stupid or ignorant of the dangers.

Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*,
ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the
means to
move to a safer district.

They can walk!

You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford to move,
walking
won't help them.
*
*correction** "afford *to* move".

A cockney wanting to write correctly ROTFPMSL!

Point out the grammar mistakes for me!

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:15:56 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:


Just to be clear. I DO feel sorry for the people who have no *choice*,
ie; the ones who are natives and born there who do not have the means to
move to a safer district.

They can walk!

YOU can only wank, you filthy ******!

--
More of Scottish ****** Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL)
sociopathic "life":
"I go commando. Underpants are for people suffering from anal seepage."
MID:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:47:59 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:


*correction* "afford *to* move".

A cockney wanting to write correctly ROTFPMSL!

A congenital idiot unable to hide his idiocy! LOL

--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic world:
"Most animals don't attack me, even though their owners tell me they're
dangerous. I had to laugh at one woman who ran out to tell me her dog was
going to bite my hand off, then saw me petting it. I once bought a parrot
that was extremely vicious. I walked into his house and picked it up, then
cuddled it. He said he'd never seen it do that in 10 years."
MID:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:47:28 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:

You too have a comprehension problem. If they can't afford move, walking
won't help them.

Moving isn't expensive if you do it yourself.

Depends of course on what kind of possessions or even houses they have,
driveling sociopath!

--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) Nazism:

"Unfortunately Hitler was stopped."
MID:

"I'd have been a conscientious objector, mainly because I would have taken
Hitler's side. Better yet, defect and blow up my own people."
MID:

"Trump is a mild Hitler. The real deal would be better"
MID:

"Are you one of those Nazi haters that does so because "it's the right thing
to do"? Tell me one thing they did wrong, just one."
MID:

"Oh come on, wars are fun!"
MID:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:15:36 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:



I think

LOL! There's the snag again, Birdbrain!

--
Mr Pounder Esquire about Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL):
"the **** poor delivery boy with no hot running water, 11 cats and
several parrots living in his hovel."
MID: