A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More lies!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 3rd 16, 10:26 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
colwyn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 345
Default More lies!

The public perception of the dangers of cycling is a long way from the
truth.

Cycling is safer than gardening

Cycling is a safe activity. As policy adviser, Chris Boardman, said at
the launch of British Cycling’s ‘Time to #ChooseCycling’ manifesto,
‘cycling is now safer than gardening’.
The figures from ROSPA show that an estimated 300,000 people in Britain
each year are hospitalised because of injuries sustained while gardening.
This compares to 19,000 people were injured while cycling– that’s not
even 10% of the number of people injured gardening.
There is just one death every 1,000 times pedalled around the Earth.
The National Travel Survey in 2012 suggests that the general risk of
injury from cycling in the UK is just one injury per 19,230 hours of
cycling.
The Reported Road Casualties annual report (2012), 118 people were
killed in the United Kingdom during 2012. While this is 118 too many,
and we would of course like roads to be safer, the figure of cycling
deaths pales in comparison to the 14,000 other deaths caused by
accidents in the UK.
Cycling is safer than walking

You are less likely to be killed in a mile of cycling than mile walking
(DfT 2011)
Research by the University College London has shown that an individual
who cycles one hour a day for 40 years would cover about 180,000km,
while accumulating only a one in 150 chance of fatal injury.
Is it safe NOT to cycle?

Driving is a sedentary activity so if you choose to replace one of the
trips by bike health benefits outweigh the risk by 20 times.
Two thirds of all car journeys are less than five miles – that’s just a
25 minute bike ride.
If we replace just 1 in 10 of our journeys by car it would lead to a
direct saving to the NHS of £2.5 billion over 10 years. Read more on
this in our ten-point #ChooseCycling plan.
For every person who replaces half of their car journeys by bike it
delivers benefits worth £590 through improved public health, lower
pollution and reduced congestion. (Cycling England 2009)
Research carried out by the University College London has shown that
cycling is five times safer than driving for young male drivers between
the ages of 17-20 years of age.
Cycling is getting safer

The ‘safety in numbers’ effect means that the more people cycle the
safer it becomes. The Netherlands is currently the safest place in the
world to cycle. It’s a completely normal part of everyday culture.
Thanks to British Cycling there are now two-million people who cycle
once a week and this number is increasing rapidly.
There has been a 40% reduction since 1994 in cyclists killed on the roads.
Historical trends suggest that cycling in London has become safer. While
the number of people killed or seriously injured (KSIs) has increased
slightly over the last few years, the number of people cycling has
increased by 150% according to TFL data.

Read more at
https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/ca...PB2ICjpKe8F.99
Ads
  #2  
Old July 3rd 16, 11:09 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
MrCheerful
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,757
Default More lies!

On 03/07/2016 10:26, colwyn wrote:
The public perception of the dangers of cycling is a long way from the
truth.


The Public see cyclists riding dangerously, see close shaves and get
held up for hours when cyclists get squashed, what else would be their
perception ?

Cyclists are their own worst enemy.

Gardening accidents are obviously going to be more common than cycle
accidents, there are vastly more gardeners than cyclists, and gardeners
use sharp tools a lot.

The UK used to have a lot of cyclists, but the public wanted something
better, so cars proliferated.

  #3  
Old July 3rd 16, 12:21 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Alycidon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,921
Default More lies!

On Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:28:08 UTC+1, colwyn wrote:
The public perception of the dangers of cycling is a long way from the
truth.

Cycling is safer than gardening


And walking near the coast.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...ed-168-8145217
  #4  
Old July 3rd 16, 01:08 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Parry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,164
Default More lies!

On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 10:26:08 +0100, colwyn
wrote:

The public perception of the dangers of cycling is a long way from the
truth.

Cycling is safer than gardening

Cycling is a safe activity. As policy adviser, Chris Boardman, said at
the launch of British Cycling’s ‘Time to #ChooseCycling’ manifesto,
‘cycling is now safer than gardening’.
The figures from ROSPA show that an estimated 300,000 people in Britain
each year are hospitalised because of injuries sustained while gardening.
This compares to 19,000 people were injured while cycling– that’s not
even 10% of the number of people injured gardening.


Freefall parachuting is safer than cycling, far fewer people are
hospitalised because of injuries freefall parachuting than cycling.

There is just one death every 1,000 times pedalled around the Earth.
The National Travel Survey in 2012 suggests that the general risk of
injury from cycling in the UK is just one injury per 19,230 hours of
cycling.
The Reported Road Casualties annual report (2012), 118 people were
killed in the United Kingdom during 2012. While this is 118 too many,
and we would of course like roads to be safer, the figure of cycling
deaths pales in comparison to the 14,000 other deaths caused by
accidents in the UK.
Cycling is safer than walking


So the money being spent on cycling improvements to improve safety
should instead be spent on pedestrians?

You are less likely to be killed in a mile of cycling than mile walking
(DfT 2011)


But, on the same figures, ten times more dangerous than driving.

Research by the University College London has shown that an individual
who cycles one hour a day for 40 years would cover about 180,000km,
while accumulating only a one in 150 chance of fatal injury.
Is it safe NOT to cycle?


The "safety" of cycling depends upon the obsessive fixation on the
numbers killed and those seriously injured. While the reports of
deaths are pretty accurate those on seriously injured are not and many
such injuries never appear on official records. Very few regular
cyclists will go for a year, never mind a decade, with no injuries
involving their bike. Most such accidents are caused simply by them
falling off an inherently unstable machine.

Cycling is getting safer

The ‘safety in numbers’ effect means that the more people cycle the
safer it becomes.


Since 2001 the number of people killed or seriously injured has gone
down for every mode of transport (car, motorcycle, walking) except for
pushbikes where it has gone up. Cycling is not getting safer.


If cycling is so safe why do it's proponents constantly feel the need
to manipulate, misuse or misrepresent information to suit their
agenda?


  #5  
Old July 4th 16, 10:36 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default More lies!

On 03.07.2016 22:09, MrCheerful wrote:
On 03/07/2016 10:26, colwyn wrote:
The public perception of the dangers of cycling is a long way from the
truth.


The Public see cyclists riding dangerously, see close shaves and get
held up for hours when cyclists get squashed, what else would be their
perception ?

Cyclists are their own worst enemy.

Gardening accidents are obviously going to be more common than cycle
accidents, there are vastly more gardeners than cyclists, and gardeners
use sharp tools a lot.

The UK used to have a lot of cyclists, but the public wanted something
better, so cars proliferated.

Oh how glad I am to be not public, according to Cheerless.

After all I ride a bicycle, a very convenient delightful economical
viable means of transport, and we all know that you think bicyclists are
the ****witted pits of humanity.
I really feel complimented by that, because you said it.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a **** by you.
Especially by you.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in your eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what you think of bicyclists.
And because it is you who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HOW LETHAL IS CYCLING, PART 2: Lies, damned lies, and Krygo"Facts" Andre Jute[_2_] Techniques 23 April 12th 10 02:37 AM
more lies from Velonews MagillaGorilla[_2_] Racing 1 November 24th 09 08:58 AM
Velonews lies again MagillaGorilla[_2_] Racing 0 November 23rd 09 04:54 PM
more helmet lies Ian Smith UK 8 September 5th 05 10:38 AM
The John and Chris Show, LIES, LIES, LIES Johnny NoCom Recumbent Biking 3 December 3rd 04 07:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.