|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"hold my beer and watch this..." wrote in message ... Those little tabs that come on all forks now that you have to file off. Those things have been called Lawyers' Lips for awhile. When was the last time you bought a bike? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
hold my beer and watch this... wrote: Those little tabs that come on all forks now that you have to file off. This is one of these cultural things that shows up here every so often and make me wonder which planet I'm on and which planet everyone else is on... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
another reason to hate lawyers
Those little tabs that come on all forks now that you have to file off.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"hold my beer and watch this..." wrote in message ... Those little tabs that come on all forks now that you have to file off. IIRC, they were thought up by the good folks at the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Not all of them are lawyers, but the CPSC lawyers no doubt drafted the rule. It seems the rule has been relaxed or done away with. I have a Marin Treviso built in Italy by Billato in 1999 that does not have the lawyer lips. The Cannondale CAAD5 frame I bought in 2002 has them. Maybe the Cannondale lawyers are to blame for that. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Carl Sundquist" wrote in message Those things have been called Lawyers' Lips for awhile. Locally, I've heard them referred to as 'lawyer tabs.' When was the last time you bought a bike? About 30 days ago. And I filed off some lawyer tabs about 29 days, 23 hours and 55 minutes ago. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Carl Sundquist" wrote in message ... "hold my beer and watch this..." wrote in message ... Those little tabs that come on all forks now that you have to file off. Those things have been called Lawyers' Lips for awhile. When was the last time you bought a bike? I know that bike have had those things for many years now, but isn't it still possible to get a fork (as in putting together your own frameset and build kit) without the "lips"? Does literally every fork sold in the US now have those things, or just complete bikes? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
hold my beer and watch this... wrote:
Those little tabs that come on all forks now that you have to file off. It's not just the lawyers, they have help from guys like US cycling legend John Howard who was willing to lie under oath in order to earn an expert witness fee. http://www.swhlaw.com/cyclwin.htm --------- Howard said secondary retention is more important on mountain bikes than on road bikes. The adjusting nut on the skewer can vibrate loose over time, he said. "Mountain bikes see more abuse. Those threads will back-off after a time. The process by which that occurs is not entirely clear to me, but threads do not stay tight under constant vibration and I think I successfully convinced the jury of that," he said. --------- What horse****! Bob Schwartz |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris" writes:
"Carl Sundquist" wrote in message ... "hold my beer and watch this..." wrote in message ... Those little tabs that come on all forks now that you have to file off. Those things have been called Lawyers' Lips for awhile. When was the last time you bought a bike? I know that bike have had those things for many years now, but isn't it still possible to get a fork (as in putting together your own frameset and build kit) without the "lips"? Does literally every fork sold in the US now have those things, or just complete bikes? Admittedly they are a nuisance, but probably a necessary one. If they really annoy you, file them off or find a fork that doesn't have them. -- le Vent a Dos, Davey Crockett Six Day Site: http://sixday.741.com/ Latest news at http://sixday.741.com/news.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
B. Lafferty wrote:
IIRC, they were thought up by the good folks at the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Not all of them are lawyers, but the CPSC lawyers no doubt drafted the rule. 16 CFR 1512.12(c) says "Front hubs not equipped with lever-operated quick-release devices shall have a positive retention feature that shall be tested in accordance with the front hub retention test, Sec. 1512.18(j) (3), to assure that when the locking devices are released the wheel will not separate from the fork." Perhaps I read that incorrectly but I think that exempts quick-release wheels. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
wrote:
Admittedly they are a nuisance, but probably a necessary one. If they really annoy you, file them off or find a fork that doesn't have them. 15 or so years ago, I was second in line in a group heading south on US 101 and as we crossed over the Refugio Rd. bridge going 25-30 mph, the guy in front went to bunny hop the little lip in the pavement and, jeezus h, his front wheel came out. You can imagine the nightmarish physics of what ensued. What goes through your mind in that split second between when you realize your wheel is out and when your fork tips hit the pavement? In his case, he had changed a front flat about 20 minutes earlier and somehow just didn't finish the job. I don't file mine off because the chance of a brain lapse is not zero, and the need for a 30-second wheel change versus a 40-second wheel change is not that critical for 99.9% of us hacks. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enough with the OT politics! | Steve Christensen | Recumbent Biking | 51 | February 4th 04 09:26 AM |
Evening Hate | Simonb | UK | 7 | October 6th 03 04:40 PM |