|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Longer spokes or longer nipples?
Hello everybody,
I recently made a new front wheel for my city bike. Unfortunately either because the manufacturer did not provide an accurate ERD for the rim (Rigida Sputnik)or because the spoke calculator I used (DT Swiss web site) did not give me the right numbers, the spokes turned out to be about 3-4mm short. Now that I know the correct spoke length I could go ahead and buy the right spokes. Or could I instead buy some longer nipples (16mm instead of 12mm I have now)? The latter is cheaper, but is it as good? What do you think? Thank you in advance Dimitris |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Longer spokes or longer nipples?
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 4:46:40 AM UTC-7, dstamat wrote:
Hello everybody, I recently made a new front wheel for my city bike. Unfortunately either because the manufacturer did not provide an accurate ERD for the rim (Rigida Sputnik)or because the spoke calculator I used (DT Swiss web site) did not give me the right numbers, the spokes turned out to be about 3-4mm short. Now that I know the correct spoke length I could go ahead and buy the right spokes. Or could I instead buy some longer nipples (16mm instead of 12mm I have now)? The latter is cheaper, but is it as good? What do you think? Thank you in advance Dimitris I would get the right length spokes. Otherwise, even in a longer nipple, you're stressing a small number of nipple threads. Depending on manufacturer, a nipple that is 4mm longer may not provide 4mm of additional threaded ID.. I would suppose that you could also end up with a stress riser in the middle of the nipple (at the end of the spoke) which could result in nipple breakage with an al nipple, but that is just a guess. -- Jay Beattie. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Longer spokes or longer nipples?
jbeattie wrote:
dstamat wrote: I recently made a new front wheel for my city bike. Unfortunately either because the manufacturer did not provide an accurate ERD for the rim (Rigida Sputnik)or because the spoke calculator I used (DT Swiss web site) did not give me the right numbers, the spokes turned out to be about 3-4mm short. Now that I know the correct spoke length I could go ahead and buy the right spokes. Or could I instead buy some longer nipples (16mm instead of 12mm I have now)? The latter is cheaper, but is it as good? What do you think? I would get the right length spokes. Otherwise, even in a longer nipple, you're stressing a small number of nipple threads. Depending on manufacturer, a nipple that is 4mm longer may not provide 4mm of additional threaded ID. I would suppose that you could also end up with a stress riser in the middle of the nipple (at the end of the spoke) which could result in nipple breakage with an al nipple, but that is just a guess. Right, get the correct length spokes. A longer nipple doesn't necessarily have more thread and most likely doesn't. http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...st/NIPPLES.JPG -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Longer spokes or longer nipples?
AMuzi wrote:
jbeattie wrote: dstamat wrote: I recently made a new front wheel for my city bike. Unfortunately either because the manufacturer did not provide an accurate ERD for the rim (Rigida Sputnik)or because the spoke calculator I used (DT Swiss web site) did not give me the right numbers, the spokes turned out to be about 3-4mm short. Now that I know the correct spoke length I could go ahead and buy the right spokes. Or could I instead buy some longer nipples (16mm instead of 12mm I have now)? The latter is cheaper, but is it as good? What do you think? I would get the right length spokes. Otherwise, even in a longer nipple, you're stressing a small number of nipple threads. Depending on manufacturer, a nipple that is 4mm longer may not provide 4mm of additional threaded ID. I would suppose that you could also end up with a stress riser in the middle of the nipple (at the end of the spoke) which could result in nipple breakage with an al nipple, but that is just a guess. Right, get the correct length spokes. A longer nipple doesn't necessarily have more thread and most likely doesn't. http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...st/NIPPLES.JPG So what's the point of having longer nipples (besides the obvious)? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Longer spokes or longer nipples?
On 3/22/2014 12:14 PM, Ralph Barone wrote:
AMuzi wrote: jbeattie wrote: dstamat wrote: I recently made a new front wheel for my city bike. Unfortunately either because the manufacturer did not provide an accurate ERD for the rim (Rigida Sputnik)or because the spoke calculator I used (DT Swiss web site) did not give me the right numbers, the spokes turned out to be about 3-4mm short. Now that I know the correct spoke length I could go ahead and buy the right spokes. Or could I instead buy some longer nipples (16mm instead of 12mm I have now)? The latter is cheaper, but is it as good? What do you think? I would get the right length spokes. Otherwise, even in a longer nipple, you're stressing a small number of nipple threads. Depending on manufacturer, a nipple that is 4mm longer may not provide 4mm of additional threaded ID. I would suppose that you could also end up with a stress riser in the middle of the nipple (at the end of the spoke) which could result in nipple breakage with an al nipple, but that is just a guess. Right, get the correct length spokes. A longer nipple doesn't necessarily have more thread and most likely doesn't. http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...st/NIPPLES.JPG So what's the point of having longer nipples (besides the obvious)? Traditionally, the long ones are for wood filled (or before that wooden) rims. http://www.classiclightweights.co.uk...omponents.html I suppose someone finds long aesthetically superior despite more mass with no better function. Regarding a concurrent thread, here's some classic Jobst on Scheeren rims from 14 years ago: "These were interesting rims in that the designer seemed to realize that rim cross section was weakest at the nipple holes and that much of the weight of most rims was wasted because all the wall thickness was mainly chosen to bridge these holes. For a tubular tire track or TT rim, where braking is not important, a thin walled rim could be made with little material loss at the spoke locations. The Scheeren achieved double wall support for spoke loads by using hardwood separator blocks locally inside the rim at nipple holes and by dimpling the rim bed just enough to accept the nipple head that rose slightly above the rim bed, could get by with a hole only as large as the nipple shaft, angle drilled through the rim. These rims probably had the best strength to weight ratio for any rim made." Jobst Brandt more found he http://yarchive.net/bike/rims.html -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Longer spokes or longer nipples?
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 1:14:59 PM UTC-4, Ralph Barone wrote:
So what's the point of having longer nipples (besides the obvious)? While there are all sorts of products that are popular for mythical reasons, I find longer nipples are easier to handle with a spoke wrench. Easier to fit the wrench on, and maybe less chance of rounding one. YMMV. - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Not viable much longer. | Tony Raven[_3_] | UK | 4 | October 19th 10 01:36 AM |
Cycling With One Leg Longer Than The Other | Bjorn Haake | Techniques | 0 | June 12th 06 05:59 PM |
Cycling With One Leg Longer Than The Other | Paul Cassel | Techniques | 1 | June 12th 06 04:11 PM |
Cycling With One Leg Longer Than The Other | [email protected] | General | 0 | June 12th 06 03:09 PM |
No longer a virgin | Mike Halliday | Mountain Biking | 14 | August 24th 05 04:56 PM |